Search

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of hyperbaric oxygenation therapy to preserve erectile function as part of penile rehabilitation after robot assisted bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind study from January 2009 to April 2013. Men 40 to 65 years old who underwent robot assisted bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy were randomized 1:1 to the control or the treatment group. Participants were exposed to air as the control or to 100% oxygen as the treatment in hyperbaric conditions. The primary outcome was erectile function at 18 months as measured by IIEF (International Index of Erectile Function). Secondary outcomes were 12-month urinary symptoms, and 18-month sexual, urinary, bowel and hormonal related symptoms as measured by EPIC-26 (Expanded Prostate Index Composite-26). Adverse events and long-term cancer outcomes were monitored. Primary and secondary outcomes in the 2 groups were compared by the independent group t-test, the Wilcoxon rank sum test and the chi-square test of proportion.A total of 109 potent men were randomized to hyperbaric oxygenation therapy or the control group. A total of 43 men in the air group and 40 in the hyperbaric oxygenation therapy group completed the 18-month followup. No statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 groups on any outcome measure.This study revealed no difference in erectile recovery in men treated with hyperbaric oxygenation therapy vs placebo. Larger studies involving more diverse comorbidities and different hyperbaric oxygenation therapy regimens are needed to better evaluate the usefulness of hyperbaric oxygenation therapy for penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy.

Continuous intraoperative norepinephrine infusion combined with restrictive deferred hydration improves surgical field visibility, and significantly decreases intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications in patients undergoing radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. We determined whether the intraoperative fluid regimen would affect functional results (continence and erectile function) 1 year after orthotopic ileal bladder substitution.We analyzed a subgroup of 93 patients who received an ileal orthotopic bladder substitute. The subgroup was part of a randomized trial in 167 patients initially allocated to continuous norepinephrine administration starting with 2 μg/kg per hour combined with 1 ml/kg per hour initially and 3 ml/kg per hour crystalloid infusion after cystectomy (norepinephrine/low volume group of 51) or a standard crystalloid infusion of 6 ml/kg per hour throughout surgery (42 controls). We prospectively assessed daytime and nighttime continence, and erectile function 1 year postoperatively in the 93-patient subgroup.Daytime continence was reported by 44 of 51 patients (86%) in the norepinephrine/low volume group and by 27 of 42 controls (64%) (p = 0.016), and nighttime continence was reported by 38 (75%) and 25 (60%), respectively (p = 0.077). Erectile function recovery was reported by 26 of 33 preoperatively potent patients (79%) in the norepinephrine/low volume group and by 11 of 29 controls (38%) (p = 0.002).Patients who undergo radical cystectomy and orthotopic bladder substitution with continuous norepinephrine infusion and restrictive hydration during surgery have significantly better daytime continence and erectile function 1 year postoperatively.

We investigated the in vitro inhibitory effects of avanafil, a novel, potent inhibitor of phosphodiesterase-5, on 11 phosphodiesterases. We also studied its potentiation of penile tumescence in dogs.Phosphodiesterase assay was done with the 4 phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors avanafil, sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil using 11 phosphodiesterase isozymes. In anesthetized dogs the pelvic nerve was repeatedly stimulated to evoke tumescence. Intracavernous pressure was measured after avanafil or sildenafil administration.Avanafil specifically inhibited phosphodiesterase-5 activity at a 50% inhibitory concentration of 5.2 nM. Avanafil showed higher selectivity (121-fold) against phosphodiesterase-6 than sildenafil and vardenafil (16 to 21-fold) and showed excellent selectivity (greater than 10,000-fold) against phosphodiesterase-1 compared with sildenafil (375-fold). Avanafil also had higher selectivity against phosphodiesterase-11 than tadalafil (greater than 19,000 vs 25-fold). Avanafil also showed excellent selectivity against all other phosphodiesterases. After intravenous administration in anesthetized dogs the 200% effective dose of avanafil and sildenafil on the penile tumescence was 37.5 and 34.6 μg/kg, respectively. After intraduodenal administration the 200% effective dose of avanafil and sildenafil on tumescence was 151.7 and 79.0 μg/kg at the peak time, respectively. Time to peak response with avanafil and sildenafil was 10 and 30 minutes, respectively, indicating a more rapid onset of avanafil.Avanafil has a favorable phosphodiesterase-5 selectivity profile compared to that of marketed phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors. Avanafil shows excellent in vitro and in vivo potency, and fast onset of action for penile erection. Cumulative data suggest that avanafil has a promising pharmacological profile for erectile dysfunction.

We evaluated the efficacy onset and safety of tadalafil 2.5 and 5 mg once daily for 14 days compared with placebo in men with erectile dysfunction.In this randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study we randomized 372 men after a 4-week run-in period to receive placebo, or tadalafil 2.5 or 5 mg once daily for 14 days, followed by a 14-day open label extension period of tadalafil 5 mg once daily. Primary analysis focused on the cumulative percent of men with a successful intercourse attempt during the first 4 days of treatment. On secondary analysis we evaluated the percent of successful attempts during the study. The Sexual Encounter Profile diary question 3 was used to assess efficacy. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events and vital signs.Significantly more men in the tadalafil 5 mg group achieved successful intercourse, as indicated by a yes response to diary question 3, than those on placebo by day 2 (48.6% vs 36.6%, p0.025). The tadalafil 2.5 mg group did not separate from the placebo group on primary analysis. Secondary analysis showed that men on tadalafil 2.5 mg achieved a significantly higher percent of successful intercourse attempts than those on placebo by day 3 (35.5% vs 27.2%, p0.025). All groups further improved during the open label extension period. Tadalafil was well tolerated.This prospective trial shows the onset of efficacy of tadalafil 2.5 and 5 mg once daily within a few days of initiating therapy.

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of sildenafil citrate for treating erectile dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis.A total of 203 patients with multiple sclerosis (age range 18 to 50 years old) with erectile dysfunction were randomly assigned to receive 50 to 100 mg sildenafil (102 patients in group 1) or a similar regimen of placebo (101 patients in group 2) 45 minutes to 2 hours before sexual stimulation. Patients were asked to use at least 24 doses/attempts at home. Primary outcome measures consisted of responses to questions 3 and 4 from the International Index of Erectile Function questionnaires well as responses to Sexual Encounter Profile diary questions 2 and 3. We also assessed the number of attempts at sexual intercourse, the number of attempts that were successful and adverse drug effects.Improved erections (positive response to the Global Assessment Questionnaire) were reported by 32.8% of patients receiving sildenafil and 17.6% of those receiving placebo (p = 0.04). For Sexual Encounter Profile question 2 (successful penetration) the increase from baseline in mean per patient percentage of yes responses was 29.4% after sildenafil vs 18.8% after placebo (p = 0.04). The proportion of successful sexual attempts ranged from 12% to 26% for sildenafil and from 9% to 21% for placebo, respectively (p = 0.044). Of patients taking sildenafil and placebo 24 (23.5%) and 9 (8.9%) experienced 81 and 31 adverse events, respectively (p = 0.01).Compared with placebo, sildenafil has little effect on multiple sclerosis emergent erectile dysfunction and, therefore, cannot be recommended for the routine treatment of erectile dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis. This finding implies that there must be other mechanisms that are not affected by sildenafil or are resistant to the effects of sildenafil.

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors are widely used to treat erectile dysfunction. Preliminary data have suggested phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor efficacy in men with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia.After a 4-week placebo run-in period 1,058 men with benign prostatic hyperplasia lower urinary tract symptoms were randomly allocated to receive 12-week, once daily treatment with placebo or tadalafil (2.5, 5, 10 or 20 mg).The International Prostate Symptom Score least squares mean change from baseline to end point was significantly improved for 2.5 (-3.9, p = 0.015), 5 (-4.9, p0.001), 10 (-5.2, p0.001) and 20 mg (-5.2, p0.001) tadalafil compared to placebo (-2.3). International Prostate Symptom Score improvements at 4, 8 and 12 weeks were significant for all tadalafil doses and they demonstrated a dose-response relationship. Tadalafil (2.5 mg) significantly improved the International Prostate Symptom Score obstructive subscore and the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain, the latter in sexually active men with a history of erectile dysfunction. Statistically significant improvements were noted for 5, 10 and 20 mg tadalafil compared to placebo, as assessed by the International Prostate Symptom Score irritative and obstructive subscores, International Prostate Symptom Score Quality of Life, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (nonsignificant for 10 mg), Global Assessment Question and International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain. No statistically significant effect of treatment compared to placebo was noted for peak flow at any tadalafil dose. Treatment emergent adverse events were infrequent in all tadalafil groups.Once daily tadalafil demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significant efficacy and it was well tolerated in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia lower urinary tract symptoms. Of the doses studied 5 mg tadalafil appeared to provide a positive risk-benefit profile.

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of intranasal bremelanotide in men with erectile dysfunction who did not respond to sildenafil.A total of 342 married men (28 to 59 years old) with erectile dysfunction who did not respond to sildenafil were randomly assigned to receive 10 mg bremelanotide as an intranasal spray (group 1, 172) 45 minutes to 2 hours prior to sexual stimulation, or a similar regimen of placebo (group 2, 170). Patients were asked to use at least 16 doses/attempts at home. They underwent preliminary assessment, including medical and sexual history, and self-administered International Index of Erectile Function. The efficacy of 2 treatments was assessed every 4 attempts during treatment and at the end of study, using responses to International Index of Erectile Function, and evaluation of mean intercourse satisfaction domain, mean weekly coitus episodes and adverse drug effects.Positive clinical results were seen in 51 (33.5%) patients in the bremelanotide group compared with 13 (8.5%) patients in the placebo group (p = 0.03). Patients in the bremelanotide group reported significantly greater intercourse satisfaction than those in placebo group (p = 0.03). More drug related adverse effects occurred in the bremelanotide group (p = 0.01).Bremelanotide can be an alternative treatment for erectile dysfunction with a potentially broad patient base. Further studies with different dosages and treatment regimens are necessary to draw final conclusions on the efficacy of this drug in erectile dysfunction.

We compare the efficacy of testosterone gel (T-gel) versus placebo as adjunctive therapy to sildenafil in hypogonadal men with erectile dysfunction who do not respond to sildenafil alone.A randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind, parallel group, multicenter study was performed. A total of 75 hypogonadal men (18 to 80 years old, morning serum total testosterone 400 ng/dl or less) with confirmed lack of response to sildenafil monotherapy were randomized (1:1) to receive a daily dose of 1% T-gel or 5 gm placebo gel as adjunctive therapy to 100 mg sildenafil during a 12-week period. Subjects were evaluated for sexual function, primarily based on the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), quality of life and serum testosterone levels at baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12.Testosterone treated subjects had greater improvement in erectile function compared to those who received placebo, reaching statistical significance at week 4 (4.4 vs 2.1, p = 0.029, 95.1% CI 0.3, 4.7). Similar trends were observed for improvements in orgasmic function, overall satisfaction, total IIEF score and percentage of IIEF responders. T-gel significantly (por = 0.004) increased total and free testosterone levels throughout the study, although no significant correlations were made between testosterone levels and the IIEF at end point.T-gel taken with sildenafil may be beneficial in improving erectile function in hypogonadal men with erectile dysfunction who are unresponsive to sildenafil alone.

More than one-third of men may experience erectile dysfunction (ED) after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. The efficacy and safety of vardenafil, a potent, selective, phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, was assessed for the treatment of ED after radical prostatectomy.In this double-blind study 440 men with ED after nerve sparing radical prostatectomy were randomized to take placebo, or 10 or 20 mg vardenafil. Efficacy was measured after 12 weeks using the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function, diary questions measuring vaginal penetration and intercourse success rates, and a global assessment question (GAQ) on erection.Of the intent to treat population 70% had severe ED (erectile function less than 11) at baseline. After 12 weeks both vardenafil doses were significantly superior to placebo (p0.0001) for all efficacy variables. Improved erections (based on GAQ) were reported by 65.2% and 59.4% of patients on 20 and 10 mg vardenafil, respectively, and by only 12.5% of patients on placebo (p0.0001). Among men with bilateral neurovascular bundle sparing, positive GAQ responses were reported by 71.1% and 59.7% of patients on 20 and 10 mg vardenafil, respectively, versus 11.5% of those on placebo (p0.0001). The average intercourse success rate per patient receiving 20 mg vardenafil was 74% in men with mild to moderate ED and 28% in men with severe ED, compared to 49% and 4% for placebo, respectively. Few adverse events were observed. They were generally mild to moderate headache, flushing and rhinitis.In men with severe ED after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy, vardenafil significantly improved key indices of erectile function.

Purpose: Inhibiting cyclic guanosine monophosphate metabolism may induce penile erection during concomitant nitric oxide production. Vardenafil hydrochloride is a new, highly selective, potent cyclic guanosine monophosphate phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor. We determined the oral effectiveness of vardenafil in a simple and quantitative conscious rabbit model.Materials and Methods: Vardenafil was given orally to conscious rabbits. Erection was assessed in a time dependent manner by measuring the length of the uncovered penile mucosa. Erection was evaluated in the absence and presence of intravenous sodium nitroprusside, a nitric oxide donor.Results: Vardenafil induced dose dependent penile erection in conscious rabbits after the oral administration of 1 to 30 mg./kg. The efficacy of vardenafil was potentiated and effective doses were significantly reduced by the simultaneous administration of sodium nitroprusside.Conclusions: The effect of vardenafil on penile erection after oral administration was clearly de...