Search

This AUA Guideline focuses on evaluation/counseling/management of adult patients with clinically-localized renal masses suspicious for cancer, including solid-enhancing tumors and Bosniak 3/4 complex-cystic lesions.The Renal Mass and Localized Renal Cancer guideline underwent an update literature review which resulted in the 2021 amendment. When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate), or C (low) for support of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendations. In the absence of sufficient evidence, additional information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions (table 1[Table: see text]).Great progress has been made regarding the evaluation/management of clinically-localized renal masses. These guidelines provide updated, evidence-based recommendations regarding evaluation/counseling including the evolving role of renal-mass-biopsy (RMB). Given great variability of clinical/oncologic/functional characteristics, index patients are not utilized and the panel advocates individualized counseling/management. Options for intervention (partial-nephrectomy (PN), radical-nephrectomy (RN), and thermal-ablation (TA)) are reviewed including recent data about comparative-effectiveness/potential morbidities. Oncologic issues are prioritized while recognizing the importance of functional-outcomes for survivorship. Granular criteria for RN are provided to help reduce overutilization of RN while also avoiding imprudent PN. Priority for PN is recommended for clinical T1a lesions, along with selective utilization of TA, which has good efficacy for tumors≤3.0 cm. Recommendations for genetic-counseling have been revised and considerations for adjuvant-therapies are addressed. Active-surveillance and follow-up after intervention are discussed in an adjunctive article.Several factors require consideration during counseling/management of patients with clinically-localized renal masses including general health/comorbidities, oncologic-considerations, functional-consequences, and relative efficacy/potential morbidities of various management-strategies.

Purpose:Preoperative estimation of new baseline glomerular filtration rate after partial nephrectomy or radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma has important clinical implications. However, cu...

We sought to provide a contemporary understanding of chronic kidney disease and its relevance to kidney cancer surgery. Another purpose was to resolve points of discrepancy regarding the survival benefits of partial vs radical nephrectomy by critically evaluating the results of prospective and retrospective studies in the urological literature.We performed a comprehensive literature search for relevant articles listed in MEDLINE® from 2002 to 2018 using the key words radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, glomerular filtration rate, kidney function and chronic kidney disease. We also assessed select review articles and society guidelines about chronic kidney disease pertinent to urology and nephrology.Complete evaluation of the potential consequences of chronic kidney disease involves assessment of the cause, the glomerular filtration rate level and the degree of albuminuria. Chronic kidney disease is commonly defined in the urological literature solely as a glomerular filtration rate less than 60 ml/minute/1.73 mThe prognostic risk of chronic kidney disease in patients with kidney cancer is increased when the preoperative glomerular filtration rate is less than 60 ml/minute/1.73 m

In this study we assessed the effects of a ramping protocol in patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of renal stones.In this prospective study patients with renal stones were randomized to receive shock wave lithotripsy delivered using a ramping protocol in group 1 (first 1,000 shocks at energy level 5 followed by 1,000 shocks at energy level 6 and 1,000 final shocks at energy level 7) and a fixed voltage protocol in group 2 (all 3,000 shocks at energy level 7). Treatment was administered using a Modulith® SLX-F2. The primary outcome was treatment success 12 weeks after a single shock wave lithotripsy session, defined as lack of a stone or a less than 4 mm stone fragment on computerized tomography. Other outcomes included the stone-free rate and the perinephric hematoma incidence.A total of 300 patients (150 per group) were recruited between February 2016 and June 2018. The 2 groups did not differ in baseline parameters. Group 1 received 14.8% lower energy than group 2, which was significant (p0.001). The treatment success rate in groups 1 and 2 was 67.8% and 73.6%, respectively, which did not statistically differ (group 1 crude OR 0.753, 95% CI 0.456-1.244, p=0.268). The stone-free rate in groups 1 and 2 was 36.6% and 41.9%, respectively, which did not differ statistically between the groups. However, in groups 1 and 2 perinephric hematoma developed in 23.8% and 43.8% of patients, respectively, which was a statistically significant difference (p0.001).The fixed voltage shock wave lithotripsy and ramping protocols provided similar treatment success rates for renal stones. However, the ramping protocol reduced the incidence of perinephric hematoma after shock wave lithotripsy.

Retrospective studies suggest that partial nephrectomy provides improved survival compared to radical nephrectomy even when performed electively. However, selection bias may contribute. We evaluated factors associated with nonrenal cancer related mortality after partial and radical nephrectomy in patients with a preoperative glomerular filtration rate of 60 ml/minute/1.73 mWe retrospectively evaluated the records of 3,133 patients with a preoperative glomerular filtration rate of 60 ml/minute/1.73 mOverall median age was 59 years and the median preoperative glomerular filtration rate was 85 ml/minute/1.73 mIn patients with a glomerular filtration rate of 60 ml/minute/1.73 m

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Accurate prediction of new baseline glomerular filtration rate (NBGFR) after radical nephrectomy (RN) has significant clinical implications for renal cell carcinoma (RCC)...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:AUA Guidelines for renal cancer (2017) recommend consideration for radical nephrectomy (RN) over partial (PN) whenever there is ↑ oncologic risk (OR); and RN should then ...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:The IMDC risk model is widely used to predict survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Recent studies suggested that radiologic infiltrative feat...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:The crude rates and time of progression to end stage renal disease (ESRD) after radical nephrectomy (RN) has not been well defined, particularly in patients with risk fac...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Urologists' use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has increased rapidly in the last decade. In reaction this, the Urology RRC set required minimums of MIS cases for res...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Partial nephrectomy (PN) is prioritized over radical nephrectomy (RN) in patients with CKD whenever feasible. However, we hypothesized that some patients with severe CKD ...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Preoperative estimation of new baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) after renal surgery for RCC has important clinical implications. Here we develop and externally v...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:A recent publication in European Urology reported an association between reduced renal function following nephrectomy and increased cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in kid...

Parenchymal mass preservation, and ischemia type and/or duration can influence functional recovery after partial nephrectomy. Some groups have hypothesized that relevant comorbidities may also impact nephron stability and functional recovery but this has not been adequately investigated.At our center 405 patients treated with partial nephrectomy from 2007 to 2015 had the necessary data to determine the function and parenchymal mass preserved in the ipsilateral kidney. Comorbidities potentially associated with renal functional status were reviewed, including various degrees of hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, obesity, smoking status and related medications. Multivariable linear regression was done to assess factors associated with functional recovery, defined as the percent of preserved ipsilateral glomerular filtration rate.Median tumor size was 3.5 cm and the median R.E.N.A.L. (radius, exophytic/endophytic properties, nearness of tumor to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior, location relative to polar lines and tumor touching main renal artery or vein) score was 8. Warm and cold ischemia were done in 264 (65%) and 141 patients for a median duration of 21 and 27 minutes, respectively. The median preserved ipsilateral glomerular filtration rate was 79%. Patient age, comorbidity index, hypertension and proteinuria were each associated with the preoperative glomerular filtration rate (all p0.01). On univariable and multivariable analyses the preserved parenchymal mass, and ischemia type and duration were significantly associated with functional recovery (all p0.001). On univariable analysis of comorbidities only hypertension was significantly associated with functional recovery. However, on multivariable analysis none of the analyzed comorbidities were associated with functional recovery.Recovery of function after partial nephrectomy depends primarily on parenchymal mass preservation and ischemia characteristics. Comorbidities failed to be associated with functional outcomes. Comorbidities can impact function, leading to surgery, and may influence long-term functional stability. However, our data suggest that they do not influence short-term recovery after partial nephrectomy.

We sought to confirm the findings from a previous single institution study of 572 patients from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in which we found that 49% of patients recovered to the preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate within 2 years following radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.A multicenter retrospective study was performed in 1,928 patients using data contributed from 3 independent centers. The outcome of interest was postoperative recovery to the preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate. Data were analyzed using cumulative incidence and competing risks regression with death from any cause treated as a competing event.This study demonstrated that 45% of patients had recovered to the preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate by 2 years following radical nephrectomy. Furthermore, this study confirmed that recovery of renal function differed according to preoperative renal function such that patients with a lower preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate had an increased chance of recovery. This study also suggested that larger tumor size and female gender were significantly associated with an increased chance of renal function recovery.In this multicenter retrospective study we confirmed that in the long term a large proportion of patients recover to preoperative renal function following radical nephrectomy for kidney tumors. Recovery is more likely among those with a lower preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Renal cancer surgery can adversely impact long-term function and survival. We evaluated predictors of chronic kidney disease 5 years and nonrenal cancer mortality 10 years after renal cancer surgery.We analyzed the records of 4,283 patients who underwent renal cancer surgery from 1997 to 2008. Radical and partial nephrectomy were performed in 46% and 54% of patients, respectively. Cumulative probability ordinal modeling was used to predict chronic kidney disease status 5 years after surgery and multivariable logistic regression was used to predict nonrenal cancer mortality at 10 years. Relevant patient, tumor and functional covariates were incorporated, including the preoperative glomerular filtration rate (A), the new baseline glomerular filtration rate after surgery (B) and the glomerular filtration rate loss related to surgery (C), that is C = A - B. In contrast, partial or radical nephrectomy was not used in the models due to concerns about strong selection bias associated with the choice of procedure.Multivariable modeling established the preoperative glomerular filtration rate and the glomerular filtration rate loss related to surgery as the most important predictors of the development of chronic kidney disease (Spearman ρ = 0.78). Age, gender and race had secondary roles. Significant predictors of 10-year nonrenal cancer mortality were the preoperative glomerular filtration rate, the new baseline glomerular filtration rate, age, diabetes and heart disease (all p0.05). Multivariable modeling established age and the preoperative glomerular filtration rate as the most important predictors of 10-year nonrenal cancer mortality (c-index 0.71) while the glomerular filtration rate loss related to surgery only changed absolute mortality estimates 1% to 3%.Glomerular filtration rate loss related to renal cancer surgery, whether due to partial or radical nephrectomy, influences the risk of chronic kidney disease but it may have less impact on survival. In contrast, age and the preoperative glomerular filtration rate, which reflects general health status, are more robust predictors of nonrenal cancer mortality, at least in patients with good preoperative function or mild chronic kidney disease.