0022-5347/95/1533-07788ln.00/0 ‘bur Jouruuu. or Uaococv Copyright 0 1995 by Manic»: Usououlcu. Assocumon. lsc. Vol. I53. 778-779. March I995 Pnnted in USA. NEWBORN PENILE GLANS AMPUTATION DURING CIRCUMCISION AND SUCCESSFUL REATTACHMENT GORDON R. GLUCKMAN, MARSHALL L. STOLLER, MARK M. JACOBS AND BARRY A. KOGAN* From the Department of Uroltm, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marin General Hospital, San Rafael. California ABSTRACT Circumcision. the most common operation in male patients in the United States, is performed by a variety of health care professionals. Although not technically ditficult, it results in a large number of reported and unreported complications annually. We report the successful reattach- ment of a distal penile glans, which was amputated when the Sheldon clamp was used for newborn circumcision. The literature is reviewed, and prevention and treatment of this type of circumcision injury are described. KEY WORDS: circumcision, amputation, complications, penis Circumcision is the moat common operation in male new- borns in the United States.‘ In a nonritual setting its risks and benefits remain controversial. Although not technically difficult, it can result in complications ranging from insignif- icant to tragic. We describe the successful reattachment of a distal penile glans, which was amputated during newborn circumcision by a nonurologist specialist with the Sheldon clamp. We also discuss the potential complications of this procedure with suggestions for the prevention of injury. CASE HISTORY A male newborn who was the product of an uncomplicated 38-week pregnancy underwent a guillotine type circumcision elsewhere with the Sheldon crushing clamp (fig. 1). Preoper- atively the distal aspect of the penis was swabbed with alco- hol and 0.5 ml. 1% lidocaine solution was injected into the prepuce for local anesthesia.” The prepuce—glans adhesions were broken with a hemostat and the foreskin was left in place over the glans. The Sheldon clamp was placed over the prepuce. and the foreskin was pulled through the clamp and crushed. A scalpel was used to excise the prepuce. It was immediately recognized that the distal third of the penile glans had been surgically amputated. The excised tissue was wrapped in sterile saline soaked gauze, placed in a plastic bag and stored on an ice water slush bath for transport to our medial center. Approximate time from amputation to surgi- cal reattachment was 3 hours. Accepted for publication July 15. 1994. ‘ Rafluests for re r-inta: Department of Um, U-575, University of Cal‘ ornia. San rancisco, California 941 738. FIG. 1. Circumcision complication with Sheldon clamp Intraoperative examination revealed a viable penis with partial shaft skin loss, and clean excision of the foreskin and distal third of the glans (fig. 2, A). The glans and amputated tissue were debrided gently. and the corpus spongiosum and urethra were reanastomosed with 6-zero chromic suture us- ing loupe magnification (fig. 2, B). A 5F pediatric feeding tube was used to stent the urethra. The penile shafl: skin was reapproximated with 4-zero chromic suture and a bulky pet- rolatum gauze/mineral oil immobilizing dressing was ap- plied. The patient was sedated and observed in the neonatal intensive care unit for 48 hours. Intravenous gentamicin and vancomycin were given during hospitalization, and oral first generation cephalosporin was continued for 1 week after discharge home. The urethral stent was removed after 3 weeks with 90% take of the grafi. There was some skin loss at the coronal sulcus. Polymyxin B-bacitracin ointment was applied to the glans twice daily. At 3 months postoperatively the grafted glans tissue was mildly contracted but cosmesis was excellent overall and voiding was normal through the meatus (fig. 2, C), which easily accepted an 8F catheter. DISCUSSION In the United States 65% of male newborns are circum- cised.’ Indications have changed with time and now can be cultural. religious, medical or cosmetic. The many techniques of circumcision have a common goal: to remove equal amounts of inner and outer epithelial preputial tissue in a rapid, minimally traumatic and hemostatic fashion. The po- tential for complications during circumcision is real and ranges from the insignificant to the tragic. The fairly high rate (1.5 to 15%) reflects the fact that the procedure is often performed by an inexperienced individual without attention to basic surgical principles.’ Bleeding is common and can oflen be controlled by pressure but occasionally necessitates a suture or cautery. Another common problem is a displeas- ing cosmetic result with too much or too little foreskin re- maining, which can be avoided by carefully marking the skin to be removed with a pen at the beginning of the procedure. Occasionally penile shafl skin will be removed while the inner prepuce is left. forming a concealed penis that requires surgical release.‘ Most often this complication occurs when the surgeon fails to take down all of the glanular adhesions at the start of the operation. Infection occurs more frequently in postnatal circumcision, and can range from minor infection to sepsis and death?’ No reports suggested the use of pro- phylactic antibiotics in all cases but aseptic technique should minimize the postoperative infection rate. Urinary retention. meatitis and meatal stenosis (the result of contact between 778