1. Contemporary management and outcomes of complex vascular surgical groin wound infections.
- Author
-
Scali ST, Lala S, Giles KA, Back MR, Arnaoutakis DJ, Cooper MA, Shah SK, Berceli SA, Upchurch GR Jr, and Huber TS
- Subjects
- Aged, Amputation, Surgical, Aneurysm, False diagnosis, Aneurysm, False microbiology, Aneurysm, False mortality, Aneurysm, Infected diagnosis, Aneurysm, Infected microbiology, Aneurysm, Infected mortality, Arteritis diagnosis, Arteritis microbiology, Arteritis mortality, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation instrumentation, Databases, Factual, Endovascular Procedures instrumentation, Female, Graft Occlusion, Vascular etiology, Humans, Ligation, Limb Salvage, Male, Middle Aged, Progression-Free Survival, Prosthesis-Related Infections diagnosis, Prosthesis-Related Infections microbiology, Prosthesis-Related Infections mortality, Reinfection, Reoperation, Retrospective Studies, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Surgical Wound Infection diagnosis, Surgical Wound Infection microbiology, Surgical Wound Infection mortality, Time Factors, Wound Healing, Aneurysm, False surgery, Aneurysm, Infected surgery, Arteritis surgery, Blood Vessel Prosthesis adverse effects, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation adverse effects, Device Removal adverse effects, Device Removal mortality, Endovascular Procedures adverse effects, Groin blood supply, Prosthesis-Related Infections surgery, Surgical Wound Infection surgery
- Abstract
Objective: Vascular surgical groin wound infection (VS-GWI) has multiple causes and frequently is manifested as a limb- or life-threatening problem, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. For patients undergoing operative extirpation, in situ repair, extra-anatomic bypass, or ligation can be used; however, limited data exist describing comparative results of the different operative choices or conduit subtypes. Therefore, we sought to describe our experience with management of VS-GWI and to detail outcomes of the different strategies., Methods: Patients (2003-2017) undergoing surgical treatment of VS-GWI (Szilagyi grade III) secondary to primary infectious arteritis or infected pseudoaneurysm after percutaneous intervention as well as previous prosthetic graft placement were reviewed. The primary end point was major adverse limb events (MALEs; major amputation, graft occlusion, or unplanned reintervention). Secondary end points included 30-day mortality, wound healing, amputation-free survival (AFS), and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to determine relative risk of end points; Kaplan-Meier methodology was employed to estimate freedom from outcomes., Results: There were 149 patients (age, 65 ± 11 years; body mass index, 27 ± 6 kg/m
2 ; 70% male; 32% diabetes) identified, of whom 120 (81%) had unilateral and 29 (19%) had bilateral VS-GWI. Indications included infected prosthetic bypass (88% [n = 131]; infrainguinal, 107; suprainguinal, 24) and primary infectious femoral artery complications (12% [n = 18]). A majority underwent single-stage operations (87% [n = 129]). In situ reconstruction occurred in 87% (n = 129); 9% (n = 13) underwent ligation, and 6% (n = 7) received extra-anatomic revascularization. Autogenous conduit was used most commonly (68% [n = 101/149]; 88% single stage), of which 81% (n = 80) were femoral vein. The remaining patients received cadaveric (15% [n = 23]; 87% single stage) or prosthetic (8% [n=12]; 67% single stage) grafts. Adjunctive myocutaneous flap was used in 37% (n = 54). Length of stay was 19 ± 15 days and 30-day mortality was 7% (n = 10), with no difference between conduit repair types. All femoral wounds healed (mean follow-up, 17 ± 11 months); however, 33% (n = 49) underwent reoperation (unplanned graft reintervention, 33%; graft occlusion, 16%; wound débridement, 15%; major amputation, 11%). Reinfection occurred in 17% (n = 27), with no difference between groups. MALE rate was 22% (n = 33; most were arterial reinterventions, 19%), with no difference in single-stage vs multistage, in situ vs extra-anatomic, or autogenous vs nonautogenous conduit strategies Predictors of MALE included younger age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.6 per decade; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.5; P = .02) and lower body mass index (<25 kg/m2 ; HR, 1.6 per BMI category; 95% CI, 1.1-2.5; P = .02). Overall, 1- and 3-year freedom from MALE, AFS, and survival were as follows: MALE, 74% ± 5% and 63% ± 6%; AFS, 68% ± 4% and 58% ± 5%; survival, 78% ± 3% and 70% ± 4%. Autogenous conduit use was associated with better survival (HR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.8; 1-year: 83% ± 4% vs nonautogenous, 78% ± 4%; 3-year: 68% ± 8% vs 53% ± 9%; log-rank, P = .006)., Conclusions: An individualized approach to operative strategy and conduit choice leads to comparable outcomes in this challenging group of patients. VS-GWI can be safely managed with in situ, autogenous reconstruction in a majority of patients with acceptable mortality, excellent wound healing rates, and improved overall survival. However, a significant proportion of patients experience reinfection and MALEs, the preponderance of which are arterial reintervention, mandating need for close follow-up and graft surveillance., (Copyright © 2020 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF