Search

The discrimination between active chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and the clinically quiescent infection (CIB) is not always easy, as a significant portion of patients falls in a "grey" zone. Hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) is a now quantifiable serological marker with potential applications in diagnosis and therapy monitoring. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the HBcrAg serum levels in HBeAg-negative HBV infection, and its ability in identifying the clinical profile, in comparison with HBsAg serum levels. HBcrAg was retrospectively assessed on serum samples from a population of treatment-naive HBeAg-negative patients by ChemiLuminescent Enzyme Immunoassay (CLEIA). HBsAg and HBV-DNA data were collected. Serological data were associated to clinical profile, defined in the subsequent follow-up of at least 1 year. In the overall population of 160 HBeAg-negative patients, HBcrAg results weakly correlated with qHBsAg levels (Spearman r = 0.471, P < 0.0001) and correlated closely with HBV-DNA (Spearman r = 0.746, P < 0.0001). HBcrAg levels were significantly higher in 85 CHB patients relative to 75 CIB carriers. A value of 2.5 logU/mL produced the optimal cut-off to identify CIB patients, with diagnostic accuracy comparable to HBsAg levels. In long-term clinical evaluation, a single measurement of HBcrAg at the established cut-off was optimally consistent with clinical outcome. Conversely, the HBsAg cut-off performed well in the true quiescent phase and less in more difficult-to-categorize patients. In conclusion, single-point use of HBcrAg serum levels provides an accurate identification of CIB and represents a useful tool for patient classification., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

In this randomized controlled study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of interferon-alpha combined with ketoprofen to that of interferon-alpha alone in naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C. Forty patients were randomized to receive Interferon-alpha2a (3 million units three times a week) and ketoprofen (150 mg twice a day) and 40 to receive only interferon-alpha2a at the same dose. Patients were treated for 6 months and followed up for 6 months. Response was defined by undetectable HCV-RNA in serum at the end-of-treatment and after 6 months from the completion of therapy (long term response). At the end of treatment the response was similar in the two group. However, combination treatment showed significantly higher efficacy than monotherapy in achieving long term response (10%vs 32.5%; P = 0.014). Overall adverse events were similar in the two groups. 'Flu-like syndrome was significantly less common in the ketoprofen plus interferon group which experienced a significantly higher incidence of epigastric pain'. Our results indicate that the combination of ketoprofen plus interferon is significantly more effective than interferon alone in the treatment of naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C and is well tolerated. However this combined treatment appears to be less effective than the association of pegylated IFN and ribavirin which represent the current standard treatment. Thus, the role of ketoprofen in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C needs to be further evaluated against such a treatment.