Search

APOBEC3G, a potent HIV-1 host restriction factor, is overcome by HIV-1 viral infectivity factor (Vif), which induces its polyubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Here we show that lysine-deficient APOBEC3G with an N-terminal hemagglutinin (HA) tag fusion (HA-A3G20K/R) was resistant to HIV-1 Vif-induced proteasomal degradation. HA-A3G20K/R molecules were packaged into wild-type HIV-1 particles, and HA-A3G20K/R drastically decreased wild-type HIV-1 reverse transcription products and infectivity. We also showed that the N terminus of A3G was a target of polyubiquitination induced by HIV-1 Vif. Thus, fusion of the HA tag to the N terminus of A3G20K/R reduced its polyubiquitination, the likely mechanism for the resistance of this protein to HIV-1 Vif-induced proteasomal degradation. Finding such ways to induce resistance of A3G to Vif may provide new approaches to anti-HIV/AIDS therapy.

Proteasomal degradation of APOBEC3G is a critical step for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) replication. However, the necessity for polyubiquitination of APOBEC3G in this process is still controversial. In this study, we showed that although macaque simian immunodeficiency virus (SIVmac) Vif is more stable than HIV-1 Vif in human cells, SIVmac Vif induces degradation of APBOEC3G as efficiently as HIV-1 Vif. Overexpression of APOBEC3G or lysine-free APOBEC3G stabilized HIV-1 Vif, indicating that APOBEC3G degradation is independent of the degradation of Vif. Furthermore, an in vivo polyubiquitination assay showed that lysine-free APOBEC3G was also polyubiquitinated. These data suggest that polyubiquitination of APOBEC3G, not that of HIV-1 Vif, is crucial for APOBEC3G degradation.

The human cytidine deaminase Apobec3F (h-A3F), a protein related to the previously recognized antiviral factor Apobec3G (h-A3G), has antiviral activity against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) that is suppressed by the viral protein Vif. The mechanism of HIV-1 Vif-mediated suppression of h-A3F is not fully understood. Here, we demonstrate that while h-A3F, like h-A3G, was able to suppress primate lentiviruses other than HIV-1 (simian immunodeficiency virus from African green monkeys [SIVagm] and Rhesus macaques [SIVmac]), the interaction between Vif proteins and h-A3F appeared to differ from that with h-A3G. H-A3F showed no change in its species specificity against HIV-1 or SIVagm Vif when a negatively charged amino acid was replaced with a lysine at position 128, a residue critical for h-A3G recognition by HIV-1 Vif. However, HIV-1 Vif, but not SIVagm Vif, was able to bind h-A3F and induce its polyubiquitination and degradation through the Cul5-containing E3 ubiquitin ligase. Interference with Cul5-E3 ligase function by depletion of Cul5, through RNA interference or overexpression of Cul5 mutants, blocked the ability of HIV-1 Vif to suppress h-A3F. A BC-box mutant of HIV-1 Vif that failed to recruit Cul5-E3 ligase but was still able to interact with h-A3F failed to suppress h-A3F. Interestingly, interference with Cul5-E3 ligase function or overexpression of h-A3F or h-A3G also increased the stability of HIV-1 Vif, suggesting that like the substrate molecules h-A3F and h-A3G, the substrate receptor protein Vif is itself also regulated by Cul5-E3 ligase. Our results indicate that Cul5-E3 ligase appears to be a common pathway hijacked by HIV-1 Vif to defeat both h-A3F and h-A3G. Developing inhibitors to disrupt the interaction between Vif and Cul5-E3 ligase could be therapeutically useful, allowing multiple host antiviral factors to suppress HIV-1.

Cellular immune responses against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and the related simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) have been shown to play an important role in controlling HIV-1 and SIV infection and in delaying disease progression. Containment of primary HIV-1 infection in infected individuals correlates with the emergence of virus-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) responses (4, 14, 26). In chronically infected individuals, a high-frequency CTL response against HIV-1 is also correlated with a low viral load and slow disease progression (24, 25). An HIV-1-specific CTL response has also been demonstrated in certain highly exposed seronegative individuals (2, 15, 32). Also, strong HIV-specific proliferative responses, which may be critical for the maintenance of CTL responses, have been identified in long-term nonprogressors (31, 35). HIV-1 Gag is one of the most conserved viral proteins. Broad, cross-clade CTL responses recognizing conserved epitopes in HIV-1 Gag have been detected in HIV-1-infected people (11, 21), and the development of a safe and effective HIV-1 vaccine may depend on the induction of effective CTL and/or T-helper responses against conserved HIV-1 proteins such as Gag. DNA vaccines have been shown to induce efficient cellular immune responses and protection against a variety of viral, bacterial, and parasitic pathogens in animal models. However, DNA vaccines that could induce potent cellular immune responses against HIV-1 Gag are not yet available. We have recently demonstrated that by destroying inhibitory sequences in the coding region of HIV-1 gag, we could significantly increase Gag protein expression in primate as well as in mouse cells (27, 34, 36, 37) and dramatically enhance immune responses induced by DNA vaccine (27). Since this new Gag expression vector is Rev/RRE-independent and species-independent, it provides a feasible approach to systematically evaluating the strategies that could lead to the maximum induction of cellular immune responses against HIV Gag molecules in animal models. Intramuscular (i.m.) administration of a DNA vaccine represents a simple and effective means of inducing both humoral and cellular immune responses (10). There are three potential pathways responsible for antigen presentation after i.m. injection of DNA. First, muscle cells could take up the DNA, express the encoded protein antigen, and present it to immune cells. Recent data suggest that this pathway is rather unlikely in vivo (40). Second, dendritic cells attracted to the site of injection may take up the DNA, express the encoded protein, and present it to T and B cells. Third, muscle cells may take up the DNA and express the protein antigen, with the antigen then being transmitted to dendritic cells for presentation. If the second possibility is the case, a protein that is synthesized and degraded in the cytoplasm of dendritic cells would be an excellent target for major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I presentation and induction of CTL responses. Alternatively, if the third scenario were true, a protein synthesized in the muscle cells that could be targeted efficiently to dendritic cells would induce the best CTL response. To distinguish among these different possibilities, we have now constructed and compared three different forms of HIV-1 Gag DNA vaccine vectors for the induction of immune responses. These different forms of Gag include (i) a standard Gag (St-Gag) that assembles into particles, which are efficiently released from cells and become surrounded by host-cell-derived lipid membrane acquired during virus budding; (ii) a cytoplasmic form of Gag (Cy-Gag) that fails to target the plasma membrane and therefore remains in the cytoplasm; and (iii) a secreted form of Gag (Sc-Gag) that is synthesized on the cytoplasmic face of the rough endoplasmic reticulum (ER), transported through the ER and Golgi apparatus, and released as a secreted protein (i.e., not surrounded by a lipid membrane). When these forms of Gag were administered to mice as DNA vaccine, we found that the DNA vector encoding the Sc-Gag generated better primary CTL and T-helper responses than did the DNA vector encoding Cy-Gag. Furthermore, the DNA vector encoding the Sc-Gag also generated a higher level of secondary CTL responses than did the DNA vector encoding Cy-Gag after DNA priming and recombinant vaccinia virus-Gag boost. Vaccinia virus titers were notably reduced in the ovaries of mice immunized with Gag DNA vaccine more than 125 days before infection, as compared to the titer in mice that received only the control DNA vector. These data indicate that CD8+ T-cell memory elicited by DNA vaccination is functionally relevant and provides protective immunity in this system. Again, the DNA vector encoding the Sc-Gag provided better protection against recombinant vaccinia virus-Gag than did the DNA vector encoding Cy-Gag.

The Vif protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is essential for viral evasion of the host antiviral protein APOBEC3G, also known as CEM15. Vif mutant but not wild-type HIV-1 viruses produced in the presence of APOBEC3G have been shown to undergo hypermutations in newly synthesized viral DNA upon infection of target cells, presumably resulting from C-to-U modification during minus-strand viral DNA synthesis. We now report that HIV-1 Vif could induce rapid degradation of human APOBEC3G that was blocked by the proteasome inhibitor MG132. The efficiency of Vif-induced downregulation of APOBEC3G expression depended on the level of Vif expression. A single amino acid substitution in the conserved SLQXLA motif reduced Vif function. Vif proteins from distantly related primate lentiviruses such as SIVagm were unable to suppress the antiviral activity of human APOBEC3G or the packaging of APOBEC3G into HIV-1 Vif mutant virions, due to a lack of interaction with human APOBEC3G. In the presence of the proteasome inhibitor MG132, virion-associated Vif increased dramatically. However, increased virion packaging of Vif did not prevent virion packaging of APOBEC3G when proteasome function was impaired, and the infectivity of these virions was significantly reduced. These results suggest that Vif function is required during virus assembly to remove APOBEC3G from packaging into released virions. Once packaged, virion-associated Vif could not efficiently block the antiviral activity of APOBEC3G.