Search

Summary Objective The objective of this observational study was to assess the relationship between established aging biobehavioral measures and voice decline in normally aging adults. Study design Cross-sectional study. Methods Participants 60–85 years of age were divided into two age and sex-matched groups, based on the presence or absence of presbylaryngeus. Both groups underwent a battery of tests measuring anthropometric variables, inflammatory markers, general health measures, and vocal function parameters. Differences from the norm were calculated for all variables. Parametric and nonparametric tests were performed to assess group differences. In addition, variable selection analysis was performed to determine variables that were most influential in predicting the occurrence of presbylaryngeus in our current sample. Results Fifty-three participants were divided into age and sex-matched groups of “presbylaryngeus” (n = 26) and “non-presbylaryngeus” (n = 27). The two groups were statistically different in select measures of inflammatory markers, general health measures, and vocal function parameters. Anthropometric measures were not statistically different. Based on variable selection, the variables most predictive of the presence of presbylaryngeus were measures of the Physical Activity Scale of the Elderly, C-reactive protein, laryngeal airway resistance, and vocal roughness. Conclusions In addition to group differences in vocal function measures, results for the presbylaryngeus group consistently trended sub-optimally on anthropometric measures, two inflammatory markers, and general health measures. These results suggest that this sample of individuals with presbylaryngeus demonstrated greater biobehavioral deficits associated with aging as compared to age and sex-matched non-presbylaryngeus individuals.

Summary Background Radiation therapy (XRT) for laryngeal cancers causes acute and chronic vocal dysfunction. Although these deleterious effects of XRT are well-established, there is a dearth of research with respect to effective voice rehabilitation following XRT for laryngeal cancers. Objective To obtain preliminary data on the efficacy of voice rehabilitation, using vocal function exercises (VFEs) in improving vocal function in adults irradiated for laryngeal cancer. The comparison treatment group (VH) received vocal hygiene counseling. Study design Randomized clinical trial. Methods Participants were randomized to the VFE + VH or VH group. Both interventions lasted 6 weeks. The primary outcome measure was improvement in VHI scores. Secondary outcome measures included auditory-perceptual assessments, acoustic and aerodynamic measures, and laryngeal imaging. Results Ten participants were recruited for the study. The VFE + VH (n = 6) group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the primary outcome measure (P = 0.03), as well as select parameters of all secondary outcome measures. The VH (n = 4) group did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in primary or secondary outcome measures. Conclusions This study offers preliminary data for the utility of VFEs in the irradiated laryngeal cancer population. However, findings in the VFE + VH group lack generalizability, secondary to sample heterogeneity, and limited sample size.

Summary Objectives The purpose of the present review was to systematically analyze the evidence for the effectiveness of vocal function exercises (VFEs) in improving voice production. Methods A systematic literature search was performed by two independent reviewers using PubMed and EBSCOHost to access relevant databases and to locate outcome studies that used VFEs as an intervention. Articles that met inclusion criteria were appraised based on the American Speech-Language and Hearing Association's levels of evidence. Effect sizes for outcomes were calculated using Hedge's g. Voice outcomes were categorized according to the five domains of voice assessment: visual perceptual analysis, acoustic analysis, aerodynamic analysis, auditory-perceptual analysis, and patient self-report measures. Results Twenty-one articles were included for the final appraisal. All studies demonstrated positive effects of VFEs as demonstrated by effect sizes across selected voice parameters. Effect sizes across parameters ranged from −0.59 to 1.55. None of the included studies reported adverse voice outcomes as a result of VFEs. Conclusions Outcome studies demonstrate that VFEs are efficacious in enhancing vocal function in individuals with normal and disordered voices, presbylaryngeus, and professional voice users. The available research suggests moderate to strong evidence to support the use of VFEs for a variety of voice disorders.