Search

Background: Insulin resistance may play an important role in cancer cachexia; however, its mechanisms remain to be clarified., Methods: Cellular mechanisms of insulin resistance in tumor-bearing rats (TBR) were investigated in isolated adipose cells by measuring 3-O-[14C]methyl glucose transport activity and glucose transporter-4 (GLUT4) protein in low-density microsomes at a basal state and in the plasma membrane at an insulin-stimulated state., Results: The insulin-stimulated glucose transport activity in adipose cells from TBR was significantly lower than that of control rats (CTR) (0.51 +/- 0.25 and 2.27 +/- 0.11 fmol/cell/min, respectively). The amount of GLUT4 in low-density microsomes at a basal state and in plasma membrane at an insulin-stimulated state was less in TBR than in CTR., Conclusions: These data suggest that the insulin resistance seen in the adipose cells of these tumor-bearing rats was caused in part by both a decreased amount of GLUT4 protein in a basal state and a decreased translocation of GLUT4 in response to insulin stimulation.

The development of cachexia may complicate cancer therapy, yet controversy exists concerning its nutritional management. For example, use of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) may not be appropriate because of gut atrophy, possible stimulation of tumor growth, and lack of total host protein repletion. In the present experiment, host and tumor responses were compared after identical parenteral or enteral nutritional supplementation (EN). Eighteen days after subcutaneous inoculation of adult male Fischer-344 rats with fresh methylcholanthrene-induced sarcoma (tumor-bearing [TB] rats), catheters were placed into either the external jugular vein or the stomach. Four days later, rats were started on an 11-day course of either TPN or EN with a Freamine-III-based formula (amino acids = 6%, dextrose = 21.5%, lipid = 1.5%). When the rats were killed, there was no difference in tumor weight between the various TB groups. Carcass weight was increased significantly in both the TB-TPN and TB-EN groups, and there was an elevation in gastrocnemius protein content in both groups compared with the TB-rat food group. Small intestine protein was preserved in the TB-EN group to the level observed in the control-rat food animals. Total lipids in the liver were increased in both TB-TPN and TB-EN groups; however, the magnitude of the increase was less in the TB-EN animals. Neither treatment resulted in complete protein repletion of tumor-bearing rats. EN may be more appropriate than TPN in that gut mass is preserved. The maintenance of gut mucosa may prove to be beneficial in the treatment of the depleted, immunocompromised, and metabolically stressed host.

Tumor growth is accompanied by an anorexia mediated by humoral factors that appear to influence appetitive mechanisms in the brain. Because tumor resection is followed by resumption of normal food intake, the circulating anorexigenic substance(s) are produced either by the neoplastic tissue or by the host in response to the tumor. Increased levels of plasma free tryptophan and plasma ammonia have been proposed to mediate cancer anorexia. With animal models, it is often difficult to ascertain whether changes in food intake depend upon metabolic changes or the progressively increasing tumor mass per se. The feeding patterns and biochemical changes that occur during tumor growth were evaluated in 96 male Fischer rats that were inoculated with 10(6) methylcholanthrene sarcoma cells or saline (controls). Rats were placed into metabolic cages equipped with an Automated Computerized Rat Eater Meter to continuously determine meal size and meal number. Plasma free tryptophan and ammonia were evaluated 6, 10, 16, 18, 22, and 26 days after tumor inoculation. Anorexia developed by day 17-18, when food intake started to decrease via a decrease in meal size but not meal number and reached 60% of control by day 26. However, long before anorexia developed, free tryptophan was significantly higher 6 days after tumor inoculation, and the greatest increase occurred after 18 days. Ammonia did not differ from control at any time. Data confirm tumor-associated increases in plasma free tryptophan that occurred before the manifestation of anorexia and support a possible role of brain serotonin in cancer anorexia.

The present study was performed to determine if a host nutritional treatment, insulin, in the absence of antitumor treatment could improve survival of cachectic tumor-bearing (TB) rats. Initially food intake and host weight were correlated with survival of untreated rats with similar size sarcomas (45-50 cm3). TB rat food intake (r = 0.69, p less than 0.0001) and host weight (r = 0.47, p less than 0.004) correlated positively with subsequent survival. Once daily neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH) insulin treatment (2 units/100 g) significantly improved food intake (p less than 0.01) and host weight (p less than 0.01) of cachectic TB rats without increasing tumor growth. Twice daily NPH insulin (2 units/100 g) maintained normal food intake of cachectic TB rats and turned a host weight loss into a host weight gain which was significantly greater than untreated controls (p less than 0.001) and all other methods of insulin administration including once daily (p less than 0.001). Twice daily NPH insulin maintained mild hypoglycemia (glucose = 84 +/- 12 mg/dl) compared to once daily NPH insulin which resulted in hyperglycemia (glucose = 140 +/- 8 mg/dl, p less than 0.001) prior to next dose. In addition, twice daily NPH insulin did not increase tumor growth. Once daily NPH insulin for 5 days during cachectic decline was well tolerated (no treatment deaths), and improved median survival of TB rats randomized to insulin (15 days) compared to controls (13 days, p = 0.06). However, twice daily NPH insulin during cachectic decline failed to improve survival because of treatment deaths.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)