Search

The idea that human beings have some natural rights, which is the fulcrum of today's understanding of human rights and also the declarations declaring these rights, constitutes the foundations of the modern state; by making the "individual" the focal point in the civil and political dimensions, opposed to the traditional governance systems. The view that was brought along by this thought, the right to life does not belong to a superior poweras a sacred thing, but belongs to human beings and the subject of the rights is "human" itself; had made the autonomous individual have a say on the matter of exercising of rights fully. Thus, the concept of euthanasia and the problems brought with it, have lost their theoretical attribute; which had been discussed by thinkers in various contexts, often related to suicide since Ancient Greece and Rome; and has become a practical problem that needs to be revived within the individual-state relationship with placing the act of implementation on the state. As a matter of fact, from this point of view of autonomy, people have repeatedly carried their demands on this issue to national and international judicial authorities; but states, national and supranational organizations have always rejected the demands, regarding the issue since the state has a negative obligation to protect individual rights. Through the present paper which argues the subject matter in the context of human rights, first "the philosophy of value and the evaluation activity as a human phenomenon" will be emphasized within the framework of the evaluation of euthanasia as a method; then it will be shown who is the subject of the right to life, which is one of the basic human rights; it will be discussed whether euthanasia, which is a derivative of the exercising the right to life fully, can be asserted as a "right" within the scope of human rights; and finally, its position in human rights and why it imposes the act of implementation on the state will be defined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]