Search

Background: Variation in the timing of calcium supplement may affect gastrointestinal absorption of both calcium and oxalate differently and may associate with variable risk of calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. There are few human studies addressing specifically the appropriate time for taking calcium supplement. Therefore, this study was performed to compare calcium bioavailability and the risk of calcium oxalate stone formation for calcium supplement taken with meal vs. taken at bedtime., Methods: Thirty-two healthy male navy privates, 22.7 +/- 1.9 years old (mean +/- SD), who had normal renal function (serum creatinine less than 150 umol/L) and no history of renal stone, participated in the study. The subjects were randomly allocated into two groups of 16 each. Group A took 1 g of calcium carbonate with meal, 3 times/day; and group B took 3 g/day of calcium carbonate at bedtime. After taking the regimens for 1 week, followed by 1 month of washout period, crossover between both groups was done. The diet was controlled throughout the study. Twenty-four-hour urine collections for the determination of urinary constituents were obtained at baseline and after taking both regimens of calcium supplement. Activity product for calcium oxalate was determined to assess the risk of calcium oxalate stone formation., Results: Urinary excretions of calcium were significantly elevated above the baseline values when taking calcium supplement both with meal (3.48 +/- 2.13 mmol/day vs. 5.17 +/- 2.61 mmol/day, P < 0.05) and at bedtime (3.09 +/- 1.70 mmol/day vs. 5.08 +/- 2.34 mmol/day, P < 0.05). There was no difference between the two regimens in the urinary calcium excretions. The urinary oxalate was decreased significantly when the subjects took calcium supplement with meal compared with the corresponding baseline value (0.13 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.17 +/- 0.07 mmol/d, P= 0.01). In contrast, there was no alteration in urinary oxalate when calcium supplement was taken at bedtime compared to the baseline values (0.15 +/- 0.05 mmol/day vs. 0.15 +/- 0.06 mmol/day, P= 0.9). Compared with the corresponding baseline values, there was no significant increase in the activity product for calcium oxalate when taking calcium with meal (0.54 +/- 0.25 vs. 0.57 +/- 0.22, P= 0.54), but it was increased significantly when calcium supplement was taken at bedtime (0.47 +/- 0.21 vs. 0.72 +/- 0.27, P < 0.01)., Conclusion: Calcium supplement should be taken with meal in order to avoid increasing the risk of calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis.

Background: The association between chronic metabolic acidosis and alterations in bone cell functions has been demonstrated in vitro and in animal studies. However, the causal role of acidosis and the effects of alkaline therapy on bone histology and bone mineral density in chronic metabolic acidosis have never been systematically demonstrated in humans. This study was conducted to examine the alterations in bone mineral density and bone histology before and after correction of acidosis among patients with distal renal tubular acidosis (dRTA) METHODS: Correction of metabolic acidosis by potassium citrate was done in non-azotemic dRTA patients, 6 females and 4 males, who had never received long-term alkaline therapy before enrolling into this study. Blood chemistries, serum intact parathyroid hormone, and 24-hour urine collection for the determination of urinary calcium, phosphate, sodium, potassium, bone mineral density determination, and transiliac bone biopsy were done in all patients at baseline and after one year of potassium citrate therapy., Results: Significant elevations in serum bicarbonate (16.5 +/- 3.0 vs. 24.6 +/- 2.8 mEq/L, P < 0.05) and urinary potassium excretion (35.2 +/- 7.9 vs. 55.4 +/-3.5 mEq/L, P < 0.05) were observed after potassium citrate therapy. No significant alterations in other serum and urine electrolytes were found after the therapy. Serum intact parathyroid hormone level was also significantly elevated after one year of treatment (12.8 +/- 7.3 vs. 26.2 +/- 8.7 pg/mL, P < 0.05). Bone formation rate was significantly suppressed at baseline and was normalized by the treatment (0.02 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.06 +/- 0.03 microm(3)/microm(2)/day, P < 0.05). There were non-significant elevations in trabecular bone volume, osteoblastic and osteoclastic numbers. Bone mineral densities in dRTA patients were also significantly decreased below normal values in most studied areas at baseline and were significantly elevated at the trochanter of femur (0.677 +/- 0.136 vs. 0.748 +/- 0.144 g/c m(2), P < 0.05) and total femur (0.898 +/- 0.166 vs. 0.976 +/- 0.154 g/c m(2), P < 0.05) after the treatment., Conclusions: This study demonstrates that alkaline therapy corrects abnormal bone cell function and elevates bone mineral density in dRTA patients, indicating the causal role of acidosis in the alterations of bone cell functions and reduction in bone mineral density. Parathyroid gland activity also may be involved in the adaptation of the body to chronic metabolic acidosis.

Background: Chronic metabolic acidosis in distal renal tubular acidosis (RTA) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of enhanced bone resorption and osteopenia, resulting in a loss of bone mineral content. However, histomorphometric and bone densitometric studies of patients who suffered from long-standing distal RTA have rarely been done., Methods: A cross-sectional study to determine the alterations of bone mineral density (BMD) and histology was done in 14 nonazotemic RTA patients (11 females and 3 males) who had never received alkaline therapy before enrolling into this study. The mean age was 32.7 +/- 11.9 years. BMD measurements and transiliac bone biopsy were done in all patients. Blood chemistries, intact parathyroid hormone level, and a 24-hour urine collection for the determination of urinary calcium, phosphate, sodium, and potassium were obtained from the RTA patients at the time of bone biopsy. Data from 28 age-, sex-, and body mass index-matched, normal controls who were residents in the same area were also obtained., Results: Urinary excretion of calcium was 2.05 +/- 1.59 mmol/day. No patient had hypercalciuria. The serum intact parathyroid hormone level was 15.92 +/- 8.48 pg/mL. RTA patients had lower BMD in most areas when compared with normal controls. There were two patients who suffered from a pathologic fracture at the femur. Bone histomorphometry from RTA patients shows a significantly decreased bone formation rate (0.02 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.07 +/- 0.045 microm(3)/microm(2)/day, P < 0.05), not significantly decreased osteoblastic surface (0.78 +/- 1.03% vs. 2.6 +/- 1.1%) and osteoclastic surface (0.05 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.13 +/- 0.23%), but significantly increased osteoid surface (31.47 +/- 24.52 vs. 5.79 +/- 4.39%, P < 0.05) and osteoid volume (2.95 +/- 3.09 vs. 0.92 +/- 1.05%, P < 0.05) when compared with those of normal controls. There was no difference in osteoid thickness (10.65 +/- 6.10 vs. 8.69 +/- 2.14 microm). Only one distal RTA patient who had a marked increase in osteoid thickness justified the diagnosis of osteomalacia., Conclusions: This study demonstrates that low bone mass is common in distal RTA patients. Chronic metabolic acidosis results in suppression of bone formation and resorption, which in turn may contribute to the development of low bone mass in distal RTA patients. Although minor elevations in osteoid surface and osteoid volume are found among distal RTA patients, overt osteomalacia is not the predominant bone lesion.