Search

Mutations in PKD1 and PKD2 cause autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Experimental evidence suggests an important role of the polycystins in cardiac development and myocardial function. To determine whether ADPKD may predispose to the development of cardiomyopathy, we have evaluated the coexistence of diagnoses of ADPKD and primary cardiomyopathy in our patients. Methods: Clinical data were retrieved from medical records for patients with a coexisting diagnosis of ADPKD and cardiomyopathies evaluated at the Mayo Clinic (1984–2015). Results: Among the 58 of 667 patients with available echocardiography data, 39 (5.8%) had idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM), 17 (2.5%) had hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, and 2 (0.3%) had left ventricular noncompaction. Genetic data were available for 19, 8, and 2 cases of IDCM, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, and left ventricular noncompaction, respectively. PKD1 mutations were detected in 42.1%, 62.5%, and 100% of IDCM, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, and left ventricular noncompaction cases, respectively. PKD2 mutations were detected only in IDCM cases and were overrepresented (36.8%) relative to the expected frequency in ADPKD (15%). In at least 1 patient from 3 IDMC families and 1 patient from a hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy family, the cardiomyopathy did not segregate with ADPKD, suggesting that the PKD mutations may be predisposing factors rather than solely responsible for the development of cardiomyopathy. Discussion: Coexistence of ADPKD and cardiomyopathy in our tertiary referral center cohort appears to be higher than expected by chance. We suggest that PKD1 and PKD2 mutations may predispose to primary cardiomyopathies and that genetic interactions may account for the observed coexistence of ADPKD and cardiomyopathies.

Patients with slowly progressive autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) are unlikely to experience outcomes during randomized controlled trials (RCTs). An image classification of ADPKD into typical (diffuse cyst distribution) class 1A to E (by age- and height-adjusted total kidney volume [TKV]) and atypical (asymmetric cyst distribution) class 2 was proposed for prognostic enrichment design, recommending inclusion of only classes 1C to 1E in RCTs. Methods: A post hoc exploratory analysis was conducted of the TEMPO 3:4 Trial, a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled clinical trial in adult subjects with ADPKD, an estimated creatinine clearance >60 ml/min and total kidney volume >750 ml. Results: Due to the entry criteria, the study population of TEMPO 3:4 was enriched for classes 1C-E (89.5 % of 1436 patients with baseline magnetic resonance images) compared to unselected populations (e.g., 60.5% of 590 Mayo Clinic patients). The effects of tolvaptan on TKV and eGFR slopes were greater in classes 1C to E than in 1B. In TEMPO 3:4, tolvaptan reduced TKV and eGFR slopes from 5.51% to 2.80% per year and from −3.70 to −2.78 ml/min/1.73 m2 per year, and lowered the risk for a composite endpoint of clinical progression events (hazard ratio = 0.87). Restricting enrollment to classes 1C to E would have reduced TKV and eGFR slopes from 5.78% to 2.91% per year and from −3.93 to −2.82 ml/min/1.73 m2 per year, and the risk of the composite endpoint (hazard ratio = 0.84, P = 0.003), with 10.5% fewer patients. Discussion: Prognostic enrichment strategies such as the entry criteria used for TEMPO 3:4 or preferably the proposed image classification should be used in RCTs for ADPKD to increase power and to reduce cost.