Search

Purpose: To assess the rate of return to sport (RTS) following revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) in a rehabilitation-based cohort of patients. A secondary goal of the study was to evaluate the association between compliance in post-operative rehabilitation and RTS rate.Methods: The study cohort included 79 sport-active patients (62 males, 17 females, 30.0 ± 10.2 years old) who underwent revision ACLR surgery and followed the same functional-oriented rehabilitation protocol. Patients were evaluated using a RTS survey: return to any kind of sport participation, return to the same pre-injury sport, return to the same sport at the same pre-injury level. With regards to compliance in post-operative rehabilitation, patients were then grouped in (1) Fully Compliant (FC), (2) Moderately Compliant (MC), (3) Scarcely Compliant (SC), and (4) Non-Compliant (NC).Results: At an average follow-up of 29 ± 12 months, 86% of the patients returned to some kind of sport activity, 62% returned to the same pre-injury sport activity and 59% returned to the same pre-injury level of sport activity. While no surgical aspects were correlated with RTS, higher BMI was found to have a negative influence (p = 0.033). Regardless of the type of sport, compliance significantly affected RTS at the same pre-injury level (p = 0.006): 86% in FC, 67% in MC, 50% in SC, and 45% in NC. For each compliance goal achieved, the probability of RTS increased by 68% (OR = 1.68; p = 0.027).Conclusion: RTS at the same pre-injury level after revision ACLR is challenging. A higher compliance in rehabilitation significantly increases the chances of RTS.Level Of Evidence: IV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess, using model-based dynamic radiostereometric analysis (RSA), the biomechanical behaviour of a new design posterior-stabilized (PS) fixed-bearing (FB) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in vivo while patients performing two common motor tasks. The hypothesis was that model-based dynamic RSA is able to detect different behaviour of the implant under weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions.Methods: A cohort of 15 non-consecutive patients was evaluated by dynamic RSA 9 months after TKA implantation. The mean age of patients was 73.4 (65-72) years. The kinematic evaluations were performed using an RSA device (BI-STAND DRX 2) developed in our Institute. The patients were asked to perform two active motor tasks: sit-to-stand in weight-bearing condition; range of motion (ROM) while sitting on the chair. The motion parameters were evaluated using the Grood and Suntay decomposition and the low-point kinematics methods.Results: The dynamic RSA evaluation showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the biomechanical behaviour of the prosthesis during the two motor tasks. When subjected to the patient weight (in the sit-to-stand) the low point of the medial compartment had a shorter motion (5.7 ± 0.2 mm) than the lateral (11.0 ± 0.2 mm). This realizes a medial pivot motion as in the normal knee. In the ROM task, where the patient had no weight on the prosthesis, this difference was not present: the medial compartment had a displacement of 12.7 ± 0.2 mm, while the lateral had 17.3 ± 0.2 mm.Conclusions: Model-based RSA proved to be an effective tool for the evaluation of TKA biomechanics. In particular, it was able to determine that the fixed-bearing posterior-stabilized TKA design evaluated in this study showed a medial pivoting movement under weight-bearing conditions that was not present when load was not applied. Under loading conditions what drives the pattern of movement is the prosthetic design itself. By the systematic use of this study protocol future comparisons among different implants could be performed, thus contributing significantly to the improvement of TKA design.Level Of Evidence: IV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of this study was to follow up, clinically and radiographically, skeletally immature patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with an all-epiphyseal "over-the-top" technique.Methods: Twenty athletes aged between 8 and 13 years were enrolled and retrospectively evaluated. The subjects underwent surgical ACL reconstruction between 2009 and 2013. The surgical technique consisted of a single-bundle all-epiphyseal ACL reconstruction with an extra-articular lateral tenodesis. The mean follow-up was 54 months [34-123] after surgery. Clinically, the patients were evaluated pre- and post-operatively with Lysholm and KOOS scores; sport activity level was evaluated using the pre-injury, pre-operative and post-operative Tegner scores. Objective IKDC was calculated post-operatively. The joint laxity was evaluated by KT1000 and Rolimeter arthrometers. Panoramic AP standing radiographs of the lower limbs and lateral knee radiographs were also taken at the follow-up to evaluate limb length discrepancies (LLD) and axial malalignment. Normally distributed parameters were presented as mean ± standard deviation, while the non-normally distributed parameters were presented as median [25° percentile, 75° percentile].Results: Clinical scores showed significant (P < 0.01) improvement: Lysholm and KOOS scores improved from 40 [22; 65] and 59 [42, 73], respectively, to 100 [95; 100] and 99 [97;100] after surgery. Tegner score improved from 2 [2; 2] pre-operatively to 7 [3; 9] at follow-up (P < 0.01). At follow-up, IKDC score was A for 19 patients and one who scored B. All patients returned to sport activity and had good stability at follow-up: the KT1000 showed a median side-to-side difference of 0.0 mm [- 0.4; 1.0] for the standard force evaluation and 0.0 mm [- 1.0; 0.8] for manual-maximum test. The Rolimeter showed median side-to-site difference of 0.0 mm [- 1.0; 0.8]. Three minor leg length discrepancies and axial deviations were observed at the radiograph: one patient had 0.6 cm lengthening and 4° of varus, one had 1 cm lengthening, and one had 3° of varus (in comparison with the non-operated limb). No re-injury was observed.Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the modified all-epiphyseal single-bundle "over-the-top" technique is a viable and safe option for ACL reconstruction in pediatric subjects. These results support once more that not only ACL reconstruction is a safe procedure in skeletally immature patients, but also it is highly recommended for those who want to pursue an active and sportive life.Level Of Evidence: Case series, IV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of the current prospective study was to assess the changes over time in patients tested at 6 months and 9 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with a return to sport (RTS) test battery. It was hypothesized that more patients passed RTS criteria at 9 months compared to 6 months.Methods: Sixty-two ACLR patients performed a test battery at an average of 6.5 ± 0.7 and 9.5 ± 0.9 months after ACLR. All patients underwent a standardized rehabilitation protocol. The test battery consisted of the following tests: a jump-landing task assessed with the Landing Error Scoring System (LESS), three single-leg hop tasks (single-leg hop test, triple-leg hop test, side hop test), isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring strength at 60, 180 and 300°/s and two questionnaires (IKDC and ACL-RSI). Cut off criteria were set as Limb Symmetry Index (LSI) > 90% (for isokinetic strength and for single-leg hop tasks), LESS < 5, IKDC score within 15th percentage of healthy subjects and ACL-RSI > 56 respectively.Results: At 6 months, two patients (3.2%) passed all criteria. At 9 months, seven patients (11.3%) passed all criteria. Patients improved in all RTS criteria over time except for the IKDC score. Twenty-nine patients (46.8%) did not pass the strength criterion at 60°/s at 9 months after ACLR.Conclusions: The percentages of patients passing all RTS criteria were low at both 6 and 9 months after ACLR. Quadriceps strength revealed persistent deficits and the lack of improvement in the IKDC score questionnaires shows insufficient self-reported knee function for RTS.Level Of Evidence: III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The main goal of this work was to evaluate the pivot shift test in awake and anesthetized patients by using two different quantitative methodologies and comparing the results with the standard clinical grading, taking advantage of a multicenter international study.Methods: Patients between 16 and 50 years of age undergoing primary unilateral single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction were considered eligible. The pivot shift test was performed pre-operatively, with the patient awake and again with the patient under general anaesthesia. The pivot shift test was clinically graded as defined by the International Knee Documentation Committee. The instrumented assessment was performed by using two non-invasive acquisition systems; specifically, a system exploiting an inertial sensor and a video-based application developed on a commercial tablet using skin markers. Lateral compartment translation and the tibial acceleration reached during joint reduction were used as quantitative parameters.Results: A total of 103 patients were enrolled in the study. Statistically significant difference was found between the distributions of clinical grade evaluated in awake patients and those under general anaesthesia (P < 0.01). Comparing awake patients to those under general anaesthesia, lower values were found both for tibial acceleration (3.7 ± 1.5 vs 6.0 ± 4.6 m/s2, P < 0.01) and lateral compartment translation of the involved limb (2.2 ± 1.7 vs 3.0 ± 2.2 mm, P < 0.01).Conclusions: This study indicated that significant differences in the grading of the pivot shift test exist between awake and anesthetized patients, regardless of the use of quantitative instruments during the evaluation. Actual clinical assessment reported indeed its weakness, presenting subjective variability and dependence on tester's experience. However, several factors might influence the validity of awake examination such as experience level of examiner and cultural factors, as seen in this international multicenter study.Level Of Evidence: Prospective comparative study, Level II. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare outcomes of acromioclavicular (AC) joint reconstruction with ligament augmentation and reconstruction system (LARS) ligament in professional and non-professional athletes at 2-year minimum follow-up.Methods: Forty-three patients (men; mean age 30, range 19-54 years) with Rockwood type III to V chronic AC joint dislocations underwent AC joint reconstruction with LARS ligament and standardized rehabilitation. Patients were divided into two groups: professionals (22) and non-professionals (21). Clinical and radiological evaluations were performed preoperatively, at 3- and 24-month follow-up.Results: All clinical (Oxford and Constant) scores and patient satisfaction improved significantly from preoperative to follow-up intervals (p < 0.00001). However, professionals showed nonsignificant improvements from 3- to 24-month follow-up in Constant. Although groups differed preoperatively in Constant (p = 0.037), they were not different in preoperative-to-postoperative differences in clinical scores, postoperative final satisfaction and median time to return to unrestricted activity [4 (interquartiler range 3-5) months to return to full sport in professionals]. Follow-up radiographs revealed an AC joint ratio (clavicle inferior-to-superior translation as ratio of AC joint height) of 0.09 and 0.16 in 8/22 professionals, 0.19 and 0.31 in 9/21 non-professionals, 0.14 and 0.24 in 17/43 overall patients at 3- and 24-month follow-up, respectively. Slight loss of reduction (0.25 < AC joint ratio < 0.50): 21 %. There were no significant clinical-radiographic correlations. Complication: one coracoid fracture at follow-up and one wound infection.Conclusions: AC joint reconstruction with LARS ligament did not reveal differences in clinical outcomes between groups, with 2 % of failures (re-dislocations) at 2-year minimum follow-up. Superior radiological outcomes in professionals were not correlated to clinical results.Level Of Evidence: Therapeutic study-prospective comparative study, Level II. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To present the results of a survival analysis of a series of 147 arthroscopic MAT procedures.Methods: One-hundred and forty-seven patients (117 males and 30 females) underwent arthroscopic MAT without bone plugs (82 medial MAT and 65 lateral MAT) using fresh-frozen, non-irradiated grafts. They were retrospectively reviewed at a mean of 4.0 ± 1.9-year follow-up. Mean age at surgery was 40.9 ± 11.2 (range 16.7-68.8) years; 70 patients (48 %) underwent combined procedures. Clinical evaluation was performed with KOOS, Lysholm and a 0-100 VAS for pain. Survival analysis was performed using two endpoints: surgical failure (revision procedure with direct relation to MAT) and clinical failure (revision procedure or poor Lysholm score, <65).Results: There was a significant (p < 0.05) and clinically relevant decrease in the VAS and increase in KOOS and Lysholm from pre-operative mean score to post-operative mean score. Seven (5 %) patients (two medial and five lateral) experienced surgical failure (five meniscectomies, one lateral graft peripheral suture and one unicompartmental knee arthroplasty). The mean overall survival time was 9.7 years (CI 9.1-10.3). As 16 (11 %) patients presented poor Lysholm score, a total of 23 (16 %) patients were considered clinical failures. The mean overall survival time was 8 years (CI 7.1-8.8). No statistically significant differences in failure and survival rate were present between medial and lateral MAT, isolated or combined MAT, patients >50 or <50 years old and patients with body mass index <25 or >25.Conclusions: MAT, eventually associated with other needed procedures, was able to significantly relieve pain and improve function of the knee joint at midterm follow-up, with a survival rate from 9.7 to 8.0 years based on failure criteria. Most additional procedures were done in the first 2 post-operative years. MAT eventually associated with other needed procedures could represent an effective treatment for post-meniscectomy syndrome.Level Of Evidence: Therapeutic study, retrospective case series, Level IV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the clinical, objective and radiographic long-term results of patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) lesion and partial medial meniscus defects, treated with ACL reconstruction and partial medial meniscectomy or medial CMI implant.Methods: Seventeen patients treated with combined ACL reconstruction and medial CMI and 17 patients treated with ACL reconstruction and partial medial meniscectomy were evaluated with mean follow-up 9.6 years with Lysholm, Tegner, objective and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee scores, and VAS for pain. Arthrometric evaluation was performed with KT 2000. Weigh-bearing radiographs, antero-posterior and Rosenberg view, were also performed and evaluated with Kellgren-Lawrence score, Ahlback score and joint space narrowing.Results: Pre-operative demographic parameters and clinical scores between patients treated with CMI and partial medial meniscectomy revealed no significant differences. A significant improvement of all the clinical scores was detected in both groups from pre-operative status to final follow-up. No significant difference between groups were found for clinical and radiographic scores; however, the chronic subgroup of patients treated with CMI showed a significantly lower level of post-operative knee pain compared to patients treated with partial medial meniscectomy and the acute subgroup of medial CMI showed better arthrometric scores.Conclusion: Good long-term clinical results in terms of stability, subjective outcomes and objective evaluation were reported both for medial CMI implant and partial medial meniscectomy, combined with ACL reconstruction for the treatment of partial medial meniscus tears combined with ACL lesions. Chronic meniscal tears treated with medial CMI reported lower levels of post-operative pain compared to meniscectomy, while acute lesions treated with medial CMI showed less knee laxity. Therefore, the use of the collagen meniscus implant in the case of anterior knee instability with a meniscal defect appears justified and able to improve clinical outcomes in the long term.Level Of Evidence: Retrospective comparative study, Level III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: A deficiency of posterolateral structures significantly increases the varus load on the ACL, while a chronic ACL lesion, the increased tibial rotation and the repetitive non-physiological knee motion, could affect and damage the integrity of the popliteus tendon. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to report the very long clinical outcomes of a combined single-bundle BPTB ACL reconstruction and popliteus plasty according to Bousquets technique, for the treatment of combined chronic anterior and posterolateral laxities.Methods: Fifteen patients that underwent combined ACL reconstruction and popliteal plasty according to Bousquets technique were available at mean 26.8 ± 1.0 years (range 25.4-28.0 years). All the patients were evaluated clinically and 13 by means of KT-1000 Arthrometer as well. Subjective evaluation was performed with the subjective IKDC, WOMAC and a 0-10 VAS for pain scales.Results: At clinical evaluation, 10 patients (67 %) presented a negative anterior drawer test; Lachman test was negative in nine patients (60 %); the varus stress test was negative in eight (53 %); and the dial test was negative in all but one patient (93 %). Only two patients (15 %) presented a side-to-side difference >5 mm at the instrumented laxity evaluation.Conclusion: The combined single-bundle BPTB ACL reconstruction and popliteal plasty according to Bousquets technique were able to produce very good long-term results, in terms of knee stability, subjective outcomes, functional results and return to sport activity, in case of chronic anterior and posterolateral laxities.Level Of Evidence: Retrospective case series, Level IV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]