Search

Purpose: To give an overview of the basic knowledge of the functional surgical anatomy of the proximal lower leg and the popliteal region relevant to medial high tibial osteotomy (HTO) as key anatomical structures in spatial relation to the popliteal region and the proximal tibiofibular joint are usually not directly visible and thus escape a direct inspection.Methods: The surgical anatomy of the human proximal lower leg and its relevance for HTO are illustrated with a special emphasis on the individual steps of the operation involving creation of the osteotomy planes and plate fixation.Results: The posteriorly located popliteal neurovascular bundle, but also lateral structures such as the peroneal nerve, the head of the fibula and the lateral collateral ligament must be protected from the instruments used for osteotomy. Neither positioning the knee joint in flexion, nor the posterior thin muscle layer of the popliteal muscle offers adequate protection of the popliteal neurovascular bundle when performing the osteotomy. Tactile feedback through a loss-of-resistance when the opposite cortex is perforated is only possible when sawing and drilling is performed in a pounding fashion. Kirschner wires with a proximal thread, therefore, always need to be introduced under fluoroscopic control. Due to anatomy of the tibial head, the tibial slope may increase inadvertently.Conclusions: Enhanced surgical knowledge of anatomical structures that are at a potential risk during the different steps of osteotomy or plate fixation will help to avoid possible injuries.Level Of Evidence: Expert opinion, Level V. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Biplanar distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) is thought to promote rapid bone healing due to the increased cancellous bone surface compared to other DFO techniques. However, precise data on the bone surface area and wedge volume resulting from both open- and closed-wedge DFO techniques remain unknown. We hypothesized that biplanar rather than uniplanar DFO better reflects the ideal geometrical requirements for bone healing, representing a large cancellous bone surface combined with a small wedge volume. Methods: Femoral saw bones were assigned to 4 different groups of varization distal femur osteotomies: group 1, lateral open-wedge uniplanar DFO; group 2, medial closed-wedge uniplanar DFO; group 3, lateral open-wedge biplanar DFO; and group 4, medial closed-wedge biplanar DFO. Bone surface areas of all osteotomy planes were quantified. Wedge volumes were determined using a prism-based algorithm, applying standardized wedge heights of 5, 10 and 15 mm. Results: The biplanar osteotomy techniques (groups 3 and 4) created significantly larger femoral surface compared to the uniplanar groups (groups 1 and 2) ( p = 0.036). Bone surfaces after the lateral biplanar open-wedge technique (group 3) were slightly larger than the medial biplanar closed-wedge technique (group 4) and biplane techniques significantly larger than the uniplanar techniques (groups 1 and 2). Wedge volumes were significantly higher in the lateral uniplanar open-wedge (group 1) and biplanar open-wedge (group 3) techniques compared to the closed-wedge techniques (groups 2 and 4) that have nearly absent wedge volumes. Conclusion: Bone geometry following DFO suggests that the medial biplanar closed-wedge technique simultaneously creates smaller wedge volume and larger bone surface areas compared to the lateral biplanar open-wedge and the uniplanar DFO techniques. The horizontal cuts of the biplane DFO techniques are positioned behind the trochlear area in better healing metaphysial bone, which further enhances bone healing potential. Although this idealized geometric view on bony geometry excludes all biological factors that influence bone healing, the current data confirm the general rule for osteotomy techniques: reducing the amount of slow gap healing and wedge volumes and simultaneously increasing the area of faster contact healing by larger bone surface areas may be beneficial for osteotomy healing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]