Search

The psychosocial rehabilitation and the quality of life of schizophrenics have constituted the main concern in the taking care of these patients since their return into our society. Thus, the emergence of atypical neuroleptics allows us to imagine very interesting and important perspectives concerning these 2 concepts. The adaptation to social and professional life, and the quality of life have been rarely compared according to the antipsychotic therapeutic used (classical neuroleptics or atypical neuroleptics). As many authors underline it, there are still very few studies undertaken concerning this subject because of the diverse methodological and ethical limitations implied. That is why we established a transversal study of the psychosocial adaptation and of the quality of life of 2 stabilized schizophrenic groups. These 2 different groups are: the NC group under classical neuroleptics on the one hand, and the NA group under atypical neuroleptics on the other hand. The main target of this study is to observe the influence of the atypical neuroleptics independently of the other factors. Three evaluation scales were used: the PANSS, the psychosocial skill scale (EAPS) of G. Darcourt and the French translation by P. Martin of the Functional Statut Questionnaire (FSQ), and a collection of the clinical and therapeutic socio-demographic data. Concerning the psychosocial capacities, the total results revealed one significant difference (p-value

The psychosocial rehabilitation and the quality of life of schizophrenics have constituted the main concern in the taking care of these patients since their return into our society. Thus, the emergence of atypical neuroleptics allows us to imagine very interesting and important perspectives concerning these 2 concepts. The adaptation to social and professional life, and the quality of life have been rarely compared according to the antipsychotic therapeutic used (classical neuroleptics or atypical neuroleptics). As many authors underline it, there are still very few studies undertaken concerning this subject because of the diverse methodological and ethical limitations implied. That is why we established a transversal study of the psychosocial adaptation and of the quality of life of 2 stabilized schizophrenic groups. These 2 different groups are: the NC group under classical neuroleptics on the one hand, and the NA group under atypical neuroleptics on the other hand. The main target of this study is to observe the influence of the atypical neuroleptics independently of the other factors. Three evaluation scales were used: the PANSS, the psychosocial skill scale (EAPS) of G. Darcourt and the French translation by P. Martin of the Functional Statut Questionnaire (FSQ), and a collection of the clinical and therapeutic socio-demographic data. Concerning the psychosocial capacities, the total results revealed one significant difference (p-value0.01) between the two groups. The NA group showed a better psychosocial adaptation (80 +/- 10.89 versus 72 +/- 13.39). Besides 4 key-domains are statistically different, but are always in favour of the NA group; the domains are family life (p=0.01), social life (p=0.0026), presentation (p=0.003) and housing and food (0.029). These observations incite to modify our cure. The analysis of the total score of the FSQ did not reveal a statistically significant difference between both groups but this total score seems high in both groups, conveying an important feeling of satisfaction about the quality of life of our sample of schizophrenics. Literature data also abound along the same lines. Indeed, authors underline that patients clearly prefer to live outside rather than in the hospital. Besides, this study allows to confirm the literature data while studying some domains (such as sexuality) rarely brought to light in studies. As a conclusion, we can say that our sample is representative of a population of schizophrenics, and in spite of the difficulties of methodology inherent to this type of study, we can make a comparison between our 2 groups thanks to the stu-died data. Data in which differences could be found, did not show any influence on the results of scales, thus, they cannot be considered as a confounding factor. The NA group showed a better psychosocial adaptation. Furthermore the FSQ did not reveal a difference between both groups. It seems important to remind that a prospective study, conducted for several months and with several evaluations, is essential to confirm the results obtained on both types of treatment.