Search

Background: In accordance with WHO guidelines, people with HIV infection in Botswana receive daily isoniazid preventive therapy against tuberculosis without obtaining a tuberculin skin test, but duration of prophylaxis is restricted to 6 months. We aimed to assess effectiveness of extended isoniazid therapy., Methods: In our randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial we enrolled adults infected with HIV aged 18 years or older at government HIV-care clinics in Botswana. Exclusion criteria included current illness such as cough and an abnormal chest radiograph without antecedent tuberculosis or pneumonia. Eligible individuals were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive 6 months' open-label isoniazid followed by 30 months' masked placebo (control group) or 6 months' open-label isoniazid followed by 30 months' masked isoniazid (continued isoniazid group) on the basis of a computer-generated randomisation list with permuted blocks of ten at each clinic. Antiretroviral therapy was provided if participants had CD4-positive lymphocyte counts of fewer than 200 cells per μL. We used Cox regression analysis and the log-rank test to compare incident tuberculosis in the groups. Cox regression models were used to estimate the effect of antiretroviral therapy. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00164281., Findings: Between Nov 26, 2004, and July 3, 2009, we recorded 34 (3·4%) cases of incident tuberculosis in 989 participants allocated to the control group and 20 (2·0%) in 1006 allocated to the continued isoniazid group (incidence 1·26% per year vs 0·72%; hazard ratio 0·57, 95% CI 0·33-0·99, p=0·047). Tuberculosis incidence in those individuals receiving placebo escalated approximately 200 days after completion of open-label isoniazid. Participants who were tuberculin skin test positive (ie, ≥5 mm induration) at enrolment received a substantial benefit from continued isoniazid treatment (0·26, 0·09-0·80, p=0·02), whereas participants who were tuberculin skin test-negative received no significant benefit (0·75, 0·38-1·46, p=0·40). By study completion, 946 (47%) of 1995 participants had initiated antiretroviral therapy. Tuberculosis incidence was reduced by 50% in those receiving 360 days of antiretroviral therapy compared with participants receiving no antiretroviral therapy (adjusted hazard ratio 0·50, 95% CI 0·26-0·97). Severe adverse events and death were much the same in the control and continued isoniazid groups., Interpretation: In a tuberculosis-endemic setting, 36 months' isoniazid prophylaxis was more effective for prevention of tuberculosis than was 6-month prophylaxis in individuals with HIV infection, and chiefly benefited those who were tuberculin skin test positive., Funding: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and US Agency for International Development., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: A WHO-recommended 8-month regimen based on ethambutol and isoniazid was evaluated in a randomised clinical trial against a 6-month standard regimen., Methods: 1355 patients with newly diagnosed smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis were randomly assigned one of three regimens: daily ethambutol, isoniazid, rifampicin, and pyrazinamide for 2 months, followed by ethambutol and isoniazid for 6 months (2EHRZ/6HE); the same drugs but given three times weekly in the initial intensive phase (2[EHRZ]3/6HE); or the same initial intensive phase as the first regimen, followed by 4 months of daily rifampicin and isoniazid (2EHRZ/4HR). Follow-up was to 30 months after the start of chemotherapy. Sputum was regularly examined by microscopy and culture. Unfavourable outcome was defined as failure during treatment or relapse afterwards. Analyses were by intention to treat., Findings: At 2 months, a significantly higher proportion of patients assigned the daily intensive phase than of those assigned the three-times-weekly regimen were culture negative (700/828 [85%] vs 333/433 [77%], p=0.001). 12 months after the end of chemotherapy, the proportions of unfavourable outcomes were 36 of 346 (10%) with 2EHRZ/6HE, 48 of 351 (14%) with 2(EHRZ)3/6HE, and 17 of 347 (5%) with 2EHRZ/4HR. Both 8-month regimens were significantly inferior to the control 6-month standard regimen (difference between control and 2EHRZ/6HE 5.5% [95% CI 1.6 to 9.4]; between control and 2(EHRZ)3/6HE 8.8% [4.5 to 13.0]). Adverse effects leading to interruption of treatment for 7 days or longer occurred in 28 patients (12 2EHRZ/6HE, five 2[EHRZ]3/6HE, 11 2EHRZ/4HR)., Interpretation: The results of this study must be taken into account in recommendations on management of new cases of smear-positive tuberculosis.

Background: Rifapentine has a long half-life in serum, which suggests a possible treatment once a week for tuberculosis. We aimed to compare rifapentine and isoniazid once a week with rifampicin and isoniazid twice a week., Methods: We did a randomised, multicentre, open-label trial in the USA and Canada of HIV-negative people with drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis who had completed 2 months of a 6-month treatment regimen. We randomly allocated patients directly observed treatment with either 600 mg rifapentine plus 900 mg isoniazid once a week or 600 mg rifampicin plus 900 mg isoniazid twice a week. Primary outcome was failure/relapse. Analysis was by intention to treat., Findings: 1004 patients were enrolled (502 per treatment group). 928 successfully completed treatment, and 803 completed the 2-year 4-month study. Crude rates of failure/relapse were 46/502 (9.2%) in those on rifapentine once a week, and 28/502 (5.6%) in those given rifampicin twice a week (relative risk 1.64, 95% CI 1.04-2.58, p=0.04). By proportional hazards regression, five characteristics were independently associated with increased risk of failure/relapse: sputum culture positive at 2 months (hazard ratio 2.8, 95% CI 1.7-4.6); cavitation on chest radiography (3.0, 1.6-5.9); being underweight (3.0, 1.8-4.9); bilateral pulmonary involvement (1.8, 1.0-3.1); and being a non-Hispanic white person (1.8, 1.1-3.0). Adjustment for imbalances in 2-month culture and cavitation diminished the association of treatment group with outcome (1.34; 0.83-2.18; p=0.23). Of participants without cavitation, rates of failure/relapse were 6/210 (2.9%) in the once a week group and 6/241 (2.5%) in the twice a week group (relative risk 1.15; 95% CI 0.38-3.50; p=0.81). Rates of adverse events and death were similar in the two treatment groups., Interpretation: Rifapentine once a week is safe and effective for treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV-negative people without cavitation on chest radiography. Clinical, radiographic, and microbiological data help to identify patients with tuberculosis who are at increased risk of failure or relapse when treated with either regimen.

Background: Rifapentine is a cyclopentyl-substituted rifamycin whose serum half-life is five times that of rifampin. The US Public Health Service Study 22 compared a once-weekly regimen of isoniazid and rifapentine with twice weekly isoniazid and rifampin in the continuation phase (the last 4 months) of treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV-seropositive and HIV-seronegative patients. This report concerns only the HIV-seropositive part of the trial, which has ended. The HIV-seronegative part will stop follow-up in 2001., Methods: Adults with culture-positive, drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis who completed 2 months of four-drug (isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, ethambutol) treatment (induction phase) were randomly assigned 900 mg isoniazid and 600 mg rifapentine once weekly, or 900 mg isoniazid and 600 mg rifampin twice weekly. All therapy was directly observed. Statistical analysis used univariate, Kaplan-Meier, and logistic and proportional hazards regression methods., Findings: 71 HIV-seropositive patients were enrolled: 61 completed therapy and were assessed for relapse. Five of 30 patients in the once-weekly isoniazid/rifapentine group relapsed, compared with three of 31 patients in the twice-weekly isoniazid/rifampin group (log rank chi2=0.69, p=0.41). However, four of five relapses in the once-weekly isoniazid/rifapentine group had monoresistance to rifamycin, compared with none of three in the rifampin group (p=0.05). Patients who relapsed with rifamycin monoresistance were younger (median age 29 vs 41 years), had lower baseline CD4 cell counts (median 16 vs 144 microL), and were more likely to have extrapulmonary involvement (75% vs 18%, p=0.03) and concomitant therapy with antifungal agents (75% vs 9%, p=0.006). No rifamycin monoresistant relapse has occurred among 1004 HIV-seronegative patients enrolled to date., Interpretation: Relapse with rifamycin monoresistant tuberculosis occurred among HIV-seropositive tuberculosis patients treated with a once-weekly isoniazid/rifapentine continuation-phase regimen. Until more effective regimens have been identified and assessed in clinical trials, HIV-seropositive people with tuberculosis should not be treated with a once-weekly isoniazid/rifapentine regimen.

The incidence of tuberculosis has been increasing since 1987, exposing a greater number of patients to the risks of three potentially hepatotoxic drugs, isoniazid, rifampicin, and pyrazinamide. Awareness of potentially severe drug hepatotoxic reactions is vital because fulminant hepatic failure is a devastating and often fatal condition without liver transplantation. We report four cases of fulminant hepatic failure caused by rifampicin, isoniazid, or both. These cases highlight the need for stricter adherence to and review of current guidelines on liver function tests after starting anti-tuberculous therapies.

Among HIV-positive patients who received treatment for active tuberculosis, thiacetazone has been associated with cutaneous hypersensitivity and recurrent tuberculosis. No controlled trials have investigated the safety and efficacy of thiacetazone-containing regimens compared with alternative regimens among patients with HIV. In a randomised clinical trial of 191 HIV-positive patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis, we examined the safety and short-term efficacy of isoniazid, rifampicin, and pyrazinamide for two months followed by isoniazid and rifampicin for seven months (RHZ) compared with streptomycin, thiacetazone, and isoniazid for two months followed by thiacetazone and isoniazid for ten months (STH). Between May, 1990, and September, 1991, 191 HIV-positive adult Ugandan patients with acid-fast bacilli sputum smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis (93% confirmed by culture) received either STH or RHZ. Subjects had a standard evaluation that included Mantoux skin test, complete blood count with differential white blood cell count, and chest radiography. After starting therapy, subjects were followed-up over one year for three outcomes: complications of anti-tuberculosis therapy, early sterilisation of cultures, and survival. Of 191 eligible subjects, 90 received STH and 101 received RHZ. The overall one-year survival was similar for STH and RHZ (65% vs 72%), but when controlled for baseline differences in Mantoux reaction size and absolute lymphocyte count, the relative risk of death for STH compared with RHZ was 1.57 (95% CI 1.0-2.48). Overall, 12 adverse drug reactions occurred in the STH arm (18.2 reactions per 100 person years [PYO]) compared with one in the RHZ arm (1.6 reactions per 100 PYO) for a relative risk of 11.7 (95% CI 1.52-90.0). 10 cutaneous reactions occurred in the STH arm (15.2 events per 100 PYO) compared with one event in the RHZ arm (1.6 events per 100 PYO) for a relative risk of 9.7 (95% CI: 1.24, 75.8). A greater proportion of RHZ patients compared with STH patients had sterilised their sputum within two months (74% vs 37%, p < 0.001). In developing countries, rifampicin-containing regimens should be given, when possible, to HIV-positive patients to reduce drug toxicity and to prolong survival.

Patients with bacteriologically positive pulmonary tuberculosis were treated initially for an average of three and a half months with isoniazid, rifampicin, and ethambutol and then a total of one year's treatment was completed with either rifampicin plus isoniazid (R+I) or with ethambutol plus isoniazid (E+I). 63 patients in each continuation group were followed up for at least one year, and no relapses occurred. Continuation treatment with E+I was as effective and acceptable as that with R+I and was much less costly.

Of 1072 Chinese patients with radiographically active pulmonary tuberculosis and no microscopic evidence of acid-fast bacilli in sputum examinations, only 691 (64%) were sputum-culture negative. All patients were randomly allocated to selective chemotherapy (antituberculosis chemotherapy not being started until the activity of the disease had been confirmed), to daily streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampicin, and pyrazinamide for 2 months or 3 months, or to a standard 12-month control regimen. During the subsequent 12 months, 64% of the patients in the selective chemotherapy series started antituberculosis chemotherapy. Both 2-month and 3-month regimens were inadequate for patients whose pretreatment sputum cultures were positive (relapse-rates 14% and 7%, respectively, in patients with drug-sensitive strains) but in the patients whose first cultures were negative the relapse-rate was only 1% after both short-term regimens.

A randomised controlled trial compared the effectiveness and toxicity in pulmonary tuberculosis of two drug regimens containing rifampicin and isoniazid given daily or twice-weekly for 4 months after a 2-month period of intensive treatment with daily isoniazid, rifampicin, and pyrazinamide. 667 patients with newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis were randomly allocated to continue daily treatment with isoniazid (400 mg) and rifampicin (600 mg) or to twice-weekly treatment with isoniazid (900 mg) and rifampicin (600 mg). 544 of the 667 patients (81%) completed the 6-month course (287 of 337 [85%] treated daily and 257 of 330 [79%] treated twice-weekly). Drug toxicity was not a great problem; the treatment was permanently discontinued in only 2% of patients. There was no significant difference at the end of months 5 and/or 6 of chemotherapy between the groups treated daily and twice-weekly in the proportions with bacteriological failure (at least one positive sputum culture with more than 20 colonies) or who had died from tuberculosis (17 [6%] vs 10 [3%]). Nor was there a significant difference in the relapse rate (17 [7%] treated daily vs 10 [4%] treated twice-weekly) during follow-up of 12 months. Thus, the twice-weekly regimen was at least as effective as the daily regimen for treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis.

To examine the anti-leprosy effect of deoxyfructoserotonin the drug was given in a dose of 10 mg/kg for 6 months to 6 patients with active lepromatous leprosy, in accordance with the WHO-THELEP protocol. Clinical and histological assessment and mouse foot-pad studies suggest that the drug has some anti-leprosy effect.

Five 4-mo regimens of chemotherapy for tuberculosis are compared. The two regimens in which rifampicin was given throughout the 4 mo were associated with bacteriological-relapse rates of 8% in the first 6 mo after stopping chemotherapy, but the three regimens in which rifampicin was given for only the first 2 mo had relapse-rates of 24-32%. There was no evidence that the addition of pyrazinamide in the second 2 mo of chemotherapy reduced the bacteriological-relapse rate. Removal of the streptomycin from the first 2 mo appeared to reduce the bactericidal and sterilising activity of the regimen, although the differences were not statistically significant. The incidence of adverse reactions was very low with all five regimens.

In Transkei, 143 patients with active tuberculous constrictive pericarditis without significant pericardial effusion all received the same daily 6-month antituberculosis regimen of streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampicin, and pyrazinamide for 14 weeks followed by isoniazid and rifampicin. They were randomly allocated to receive in addition either prednisolone or placebo for the first 11 weeks; the comparison was double-blind throughout treatment and follow-up. In the 114 patients assessable up to 24 months, improvement was significantly more rapid in the prednisolone group, as shown by the rate of fall in the mean pulse rate and the rate at which jugular venous pressure and level of physical activity became normal. During follow-up, 2 (4%) of the 53 prednisolone and 7 (11%) of the 61 placebo patients died from pericarditis, and 11 (21%) and 18 (30%), respectively, required pericardiectomy. By 24 months 50 (94%) prednisolone and 52 (85%) placebo patients had a favourable status. 3 patients (1 prednisolone, 2 placebo) were normally active but were classified as not having achieved a favourable status. It is recommended that, in the absence of a specific contraindication, antituberculosis chemotherapy should be initially supplemented by steroids.

A total of 481 adult Chinese, Malays, and Indians in Singapore with newly diagnosed smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis were allocated at random to four regimens of intermittent rifampicin plus isoniazid. All patients received an initial 2 weeks of daily streptomycin plus isoniazid plus rifampicin. This was followed either by twice-weekly isoniazid 15 mg/kg plus rifampicin 900 mg (HR2 regimen) or 600 mg (LR2 regimen), or by once-weekly isoniazid 15 mg/kg plus rifampicin 900 mg (HR1 regimen) or 600 mg (LR1 regimen). In addition, all patients received a daily capsule containing, at random, either rifampicin 25 mg or a matched placebo to see if the rifampicin supplement would reduce the incidence of adverse reactions to the drug. At 12 months, all the patients on the two twice-weekly regimens (HR2, LR2) had a favourable bacteriological status as had 97% of 102 HR1 and 93% of 112 LR1 patients. The therapeutic response was significantly better on the twice-weekly than on the once-weekly regimens (P = 0-0005), but the dose size of rifampicin did not have a statistically significant effect. Adverse reactions to intermittent rifampicin occurred in 25% of the HR1 patients but on the other three regimens their incidence was low. The incidence of rifampicin-dependent antibodies was higher, ranging from 48% (HR1) to 24% (LR2). The effect of dose size on the incidence of the "flu" syndrome (the commonest reaction) and of antibodies was statistically significant (P less than 0-01 and less than 0-001, respectively). The interval between doses affected the incidence of the "flu" syndrome (P less than 0-001), but not of antibodies (P greater than 0-25). The rifampicin 25 mg supplement had no effect therapeutically or on the incidence of adverse reactions or of antibodies.

The results of short courses of chemotherapy using rifampicin plus isoniazid, supplemented for the first two months by streptomycin or ethambutol, in patients with newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis, have been studied. 174 patients with little or no cavitation received six months chemotherapy. 1 (0.6%) failed to convert to culture negative during treatment and 5 (3%) relapsed in the twelve months after the end of treatment. In 177 patients with similar disease, twelve months chemotherapy was 100% effective in rendering the sputum culture negative and in preventing relapse in the six months after the end of treatment. 151 patients with more extensive cavitation received chemotherapy for nine months; this was 100% effective in sputum conversion and in preventing relapse in the nine months after the end of treatment. In 155 patients with similar disease, the eighteen-month regimen was uniformly successful in sputum conversion. The rifampicin plus isoniazed regimen was well tolerated, producing adverse effects which warranted withdrawal from the study in only 3.6% of patients. Comparison of ethambutol with streptomycin as a third drug given for the first eight weeks showed no significant difference in the rate of sputum conbersion nor in the incidence of relapse. Streptomycin produced significant adverse effects in 8% of patients whilst ethambutol caused none. Chemotherapy with rifampicin plus isoniazed for nine months, supplemented initially by ethambutol, is more acceptable than standard chemotherapy for eighteen months, is highly effective in sputum conversion, and has resulted in no relapses over a nine-month follow-up period. Further follow-up is being continued to confirm that relapse does not occur.

A rigimen of rifampicin plus isoniazid, supplemented in the first two months by ethambutol or streptomycin, was given for six, nine, twelve, or eighteen months in a controlled study of 696 patients with culture-positive pulmonary tuberculosis. The results obtained in the thirty-three months since the start of treatment when all the patients in the six-month and nine-month groups had completed at least two years and those in the twelve-month group had completed twenty-one months of post-chemotherapy follow-up revealed no relapses among patients receiving nine months chemotherapy and a 1% relapse-rate in the twelve-month group. The same regimen given for only six months resulted in a relapse-rate of 5% during the subsequent twenty-seven months. There were adverse effects with streptomycin but not with ethambutol. It is concluded that treatment with rifampicin plus isoniazid for nine months, supplemented by ethambutol in a dose of 25 mg/kg for the first two months, is now acceptable as standard chemotherapy for pulmonary tuberculosis in Britain.