Search

Long-runout landslides can be extremely hazardous and unpredictable. The prediction of long-runout landslides is challenging because it is unclear what factors control their mobility, and it is unclear how to best measure their runout given that they traverse changing topography. In this paper, we document the development and statistical evaluation of a Landslide Runout Score (LRS) system to predict short, medium, and long runout using a new mobility measure, the unitless Runout Number L/A1/2 (where L is landslide length and A is landslide area). The Runout Number has previously been correlated to three geomorphological factors (planimetric curvature, sand content, and upslope contributing area normalized to landslide area), so the LRS uses these factors as inputs. These factors are readily calculated using geographic information systems (GIS) and publicly available data sources. The LRS system predicts runout categories (short, medium, and long) with one-vs.-all accuracies (i.e., percentage of correct predictions within a given class) of 75, 58, and 72%, respectively, for a total weighted accuracy of approximately 65%. The results of this work are summarized in a worksheet that can be used by geologists and engineers to develop preliminary predictions of landslide runout behavior, which can be incorporated into or used alongside regional-scale landslide hazard assessments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An ensemble algorithm of data mining decision tree (DT)-based CHi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection (CHAID) is widely used for prediction analysis in variety of applications. CHAID as a multivariate method has an automatic classification capacity to analyze large numbers of landslide conditioning factors. Moreover, it results two or more nodes for each independent variable, where every node contains numbers of presence or absence of landslides (dependent variable). Other DT methods such as Quick, Unbiased, Efficient Statistic Tree (QUEST) and Classification and Regression Trees (CRT) are not able to produce multi branches based tree. Thus, the main objective of this paper is to use CHAID method to perform the best classification fit for each conditioning factors, then, combined it with logistic regression (LR) to find the corresponding coefficients of best fitting function that assess the optimal terminal nodes. In the first step, a landslide inventory map with 296 landslide locations were extracted from various sources over the Pohang-Kyeong Joo catchment (South Korea). Then, the inventory was randomly split into two datasets, 70 % was used for training the models, and the remaining 30 % was used for validation purpose. Thirteen landslide conditioning factors were used for the susceptibility modeling. Then, CHAID was applied and revealed that some conditioning factors such as altitude, soil drain, soil texture and TWI, as terminal nodes and reflected the best classification fit. Then, a proposed ensemble technique was applied and the interpretations of the coefficients showed that the relationship between the decision tree branch nodes distance from drain, soil drain, and TWI, respectively, leads to better consequences assessment of landslides in the current study area. The validation results showed that both success and prediction rates, 75 and 79 %, respectively. This study proved the efficiency and reliability of ensemble DT and LR model in landslide susceptibility mapping. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Landslide susceptibility (LS) assessment by indirect approaches presents some limitations due to (1) the tendency to simplify the environmental factors (i.e., variables) and (2) the assumptions that landslides occur under the same combination of variables for a study site. Recently, some authors have discussed the interest to introduce expert knowledge in the indirect approaches in order to improve the quality of indirect LS maps. However, if the results are reliable, the procedures used seem fastidious and a very good knowledge of the study site is essential. The objectives of this paper are to discuss a methodology to introduce the expert knowledge in the indirect mapping process. After the definition of the expert rules associated to three landslide types, several indirect LS maps are produced by two indirect exploratory approaches, based on fuzzy set theory and on a modification of a bivariate method called expert weight of evidence. Then, the indirect LS maps are confronted to a landslide inventory and a LS map produced by a direct approach. The analyses indicate that the methodology used to introduce the expert rules in the mapping process increases the predictive power of indirect LS map. Finally, some indications about advantages and drawbacks of each approach are given to help the geoscientist to introduce his expert knowledge in the landslide susceptibility mapping process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]