Search

Objectives/hypothesis: To identify prognosticators and determine the efficacies of surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy (SR) and surgery with immunotherapy (SI) of head and neck mucosal melanoma (HNMM)., Study Design: Retrospective database study., Methods: The 2004 to 2017 National Cancer Database was queried for HNMM patients. Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier analyses evaluated prognosticators of mortality and survival benefits conferred by SR, SI, or surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy and immunotherapy (SRI). Logistic regression identified predictors of adjuvant radiotherapy or immunotherapy use., Results: Overall, 1,910 cases (845 surgery, 802 SR, 51 SI, 101 SRI) were analyzed, with 50.3% females and an average age of 68.6 ± 13.8 years. SI was associated with greater overall survival (OS) than surgery (hazard ratio [HR] 0.672; P = .036). SI (HR 0.425; P = .024) and SRI (HR 0.594; P = .045) were associated with superior OS than SR. Older age (HR 1.607; P < .001), female sex (HR 0.757; P = .006), paranasal sinus localization (HR 1.648; P < .001), T4 classification (HR 1.443; P < .001), N1 classification (HR 2.310; P < .001), M1 classification (HR 3.357; P < .001), and positive surgical margins (HR 1.454; P < .001) were survival prognosticators. Adjuvant radiotherapy use was negatively correlated with older age, oral cavity localization, and M0 or T3 tumors (all P < .05). Adjuvant immunotherapy use was positively correlated with younger age and M1 tumors (all P < .05)., Conclusions: Although SR did not confer survival benefits in HNMM patients, SI and SRI yielded greater OS than surgery alone. SRI was associated with superior survival outcomes than SR. Certain demographic and clinical factors were associated with increased mortality risk. Patient age and certain tumor characteristics were predictors of adjuvant radiotherapy or immunotherapy use., Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 132:584-592, 2022., (© 2021 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Objectives/hypothesis: Our primary objective was to compare differences in survival of patients with high-grade salivary gland carcinomas (SGCs) receiving adjuvant neutron versus photon radiotherapy using a hospital-based national cohort and restricted mean survival time (RMST) analysis. Our secondary objective was to compare survival of similar patients treated with primary neutron versus photon radiation., Study Design: Multicenter, retrospective population-based study of patients within the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2014., Methods: One thousand eight hundred forty-four patients were selected on diagnosis of high-grade parotid and submandibular malignancies. One thousand seven hundred seventy-seven patients receiving photon and 67 patients receiving neutron therapy were identified who met inclusion criteria. Patients were then categorized as having primary surgery with adjuvant radiation or primary radiation without prior surgery. Bivariate analysis was performed to assess for differences between groups, and RMST analysis was performed at 1-, 2-, and 5-year timepoints with controlling for available covariate data., Results: There was no significant difference in RMST for patients receiving neutrons over photons at 1, 2, and 5 years in the adjuvant setting. Among patients undergoing primary radiotherapy, there was a difference in RMST of 2.29 months at 1 year and 5.05 months at 2 years for neutrons over photons, though this benefit was not observed at 5 years post-therapy., Conclusions: For patients with high grade SGCs undergoing adjuvant photon versus neutron radiotherapy, there was no difference in RMST. There was observed to be a significant difference in RMST at 1 and 2 years among patients undergoing primary neutron therapy of up to 5 months. Given the benefit observed with primary neutron therapy, it should be considered in both the primary and adjuvant treatment setting., Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:541-547, 2021., (© 2020 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Objectives/hypothesis: The objective of this study was to examine the association between modality of primary treatment and survival among patients with locoregionally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer., Study Design: Retrospective cohort., Methods: There were 2,328 adult patients diagnosed with stage III or IV, M0, hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma identified within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry (years 2004-2015). Patients who received primary chemoradiation (CRT) were compared to those who received surgery with either adjuvant radiation therapy (S + RT), or surgery with adjuvant CRT (S + CRT). The latter primary surgery group (S + Adj) was also analyzed collectively. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox regression models using a propensity score to adjust for factors associated with treatment allocation., Results: Median survival was 20 months (interquartile range [IQR] = 10-45) with CRT and 25 months (IQR = 10-47) with S + Adj (P < .001). S + Adj had higher-grade cancers and more advanced T staging (P < .001). S + CRT was associated with longer OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-0.84) and DSS (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.54-0.82) after adjusting for age, gender, race, subsite, grade, and stage. S + RT was associated with longer DSS than CRT (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.57-0.99) but not OS (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.66-1.04). S + Adj was associated with longer DSS in T1/T2 disease (P = .04) and T4 disease (P = .0003), but did not reach significance among patients with T3 disease (P = .06)., Conclusions: Among patients with advanced hypopharyngeal cancer reported in the SEER database, treatment with S + Adj was associated with longer DSS and OS compared to those treated with primary CRT., Level of Evidence: 2b Laryngoscope, 130:2611-2621, 2020., (© 2019 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Objective: For patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), delays in the initiation of radiotherapy (RT) have been closely associated with worse outcomes. We sought to investigate whether RT modality (proton vs. photon) is associated with differences in the time to initiation of RT., Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic HNSCC between 2004 and 2015 who received either proton or photon RT as part of their initial treatment. Wilcoxon rank-sum and chi-square tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between use of proton RT and delayed RT initiation., Results: A total of 175,088 patients with HNSCC receiving either photon or proton RT were identified. Patients receiving proton RT were more likely to be white, reside in higher income areas, and have private insurance. Proton RT was associated with delayed RT initiation compared to photon RT (median 59 days vs. 45, P < 0.001). Receipt of proton therapy was independently associated with RT initiation beyond 6 weeks after diagnosis (adjusted OR [aOR, definitive RT] = 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-2.30) or surgery (aOR [adjuvant RT] = 4.08; 95% CI 2.64-6.62). In the context of adjuvant proton RT, increases in treatment delay were associated with worse overall survival (weeks, adjusted hazard ratio = 1.099, 95% CI 1.011-1.194)., Conclusion: Use of proton therapy is associated with delayed RT in both the definitive and adjuvant settings for patients with HNSCC and could be associated with poorer outcomes., Level of Evidence: 2b Laryngoscope, 122:0000-0000, 2019 Laryngoscope, 130:E598-E604, 2020., (© 2019 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Objectives/hypothesis: The authors used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to analyze epidemiological features of patients presenting with supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma (SCCa) and to evaluate treatment trends and outcomes., Methods: The SEER database was queried for patients with supraglottic SCCa from 1973 to 2013. Information on demographics; tumor size; histologic grade; American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage; SEER local, regional, distant stage; and treatment modality were analyzed., Results: There were 22,675 cases of primary supraglottic SCCa identified. The mean age at diagnosis was 62.3 years, with males accounting for 70.3% of all cases. A high percentage of patients presented with stage IV disease (44.9%). The most common treatment modality was radiotherapy (46.6%), followed by combination of surgery and radiotherapy (29.2%) and surgery alone (15.0%). Overall 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) for all cases was 54.0%. When stratified by treatment modality, 5-year DSS was best for patients receiving surgery alone (64.2%). However, for patients with AJCC stage IV disease, survival was significantly better with combined surgery and radiotherapy (52.5%)., Conclusion: In general, supraglottic SCCa is treated most commonly with radiotherapy, followed by surgery and radiotherapy. Patients managed surgically had better 5-year DSS when compared to patients treated by other modalities. However, when stratified by stage, patients with AJCC stage IV disease had significantly better survival with combined surgery and radiotherapy. Of patients receiving surgery, supraglottic laryngectomy was found to have a significantly better 5-year DSS when compared to both total laryngectomy and laryngectomy, not otherwise specified., Level of Evidence: NA Laryngoscope, 129:1822-1827, 2019., (© 2018 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Objective: While surgical treatment concentrates in tertiary care centers, an increasing number of patients request postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) at a separate center closer to home. Our goal was to determine whether fragmentation of surgery and PORT were associated with poorer oncologic outcomes., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 32,813 head and neck cancer patients treated with surgery and PORT in the National Cancer Data Base. Our main outcome was overall survival (OS). Statistical analysis included χ 2 , t tests, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analysis., Results: Fragmented care was independently associated with increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.13), whereas distance to surgical center > 30 miles (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.87-0.97) was associated with improved OS. On subgroup analysis, fragmented care was associated with decreased OS only among patients who had surgery at an academic center (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04-1.17). Within academic centers, greater distance from the surgical center was associated with improved survival only in patients who received PORT at the same facility (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93), but this effect was negated among patients who had fragmented care (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.85-1.11)., Conclusion: When cancer care is fragmented, there is no longer a survival benefit for patients to travel for surgical care at academic medical centers. Fragmented care is independently associated with worse survival, and further research is needed to evaluate the causes of this difference in survival to determine if improving care coordination can mitigate this survival difference., Level of Evidence: NA Laryngoscope, 129:1413-1419, 2019., (© 2018 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Objective: Salivary squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) represent a unique disease entity because many are thought to represent metastases from primary cutaneous malignancies. Nevertheless, they represent a significant proportion of parotid gland cancers and have a notably poor prognosis. Recently, there has been controversy regarding the utility of adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of these malignancies, with most studies concluding that there is no survival benefit. We aim to determine the outcomes associated with the use of adjuvant radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of early- and late-stage salivary SCC., Methods: A retrospective study of 2,285 of surgically resected adult salivary SCC diagnosed from 2004 to 2014 in the National Cancer Database was conducted. Patients were divided into early- (I/II) and late-stage (III/IV) groups. Demographic, facility, tumor, and survival variables were included in the analyses. Multivariate Cox survival regressions, propensity-score matched analyses, and univariate Kaplan-Meier analyses were conducted., Results: The use of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for late-stage patients was associated with improved survival compared to the use of adjuvant radiotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR] 0.774, P = 0.026). Five-year survival for late-stage patients treated with surgery alone, surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy, and surgery with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was 31.1% (standard error [SE]: 2.5), 45.6% (SE: 2.2), and 58.9% (SE: 3.4). Use of adjuvant therapy (either chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone) was associated with improved survival for early-stage patients (HR 0.746, P = 0.037)., Conclusion: The addition of chemotherapy to the adjuvant therapy of late-stage patients with salivary SCC may result in improved long-term survival. Expanded use of adjuvant therapy for early-stage disease may also improve patient outcomes., Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 129:883-889, 2019., (© 2018 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Objective: To compare survival effects of comprehensive neck dissection (CND) and selective neck dissection (SND) for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with only regional failure., Methods: A total of 294 recurrent T0N1-3M0 NPC patients who underwent neck dissection in Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China, between January 1984 and February 2014, were enrolled in the survival and interaction analyses. Using propensity scores to adjust for potential prognostic factors, an additional well-balanced cohort of 210 patients was constructed by matching each patient who received SND with one patient who underwent CND (1:1); the differences were then compared between SND and CND in terms of overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS)., Results: Both univariate and multivariate analyses showed that SND was not inferior to CND (P > 0.05) but demonstrated that extracapsular spread (ECS) (hazard ratio [HR] 3.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.30-5.29, P < 0.001), recurrent N stage (rN stage) (HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.29-2.97, P = 0.002), and positive margins (HR 3.67, 95% CI 2.40-5.62, P < 0.001) were independent poor prognostic factors for OS. The interaction effects between the dissection style and each independent factor were not significant for OS, LRFS, RRFS, or DMFS (P > 0.05). Furthermore, no survival differences were found between SND and CND in the case-matched cohort in terms of OS, LRFS, RRFS, or DMFS (P = 0.550, 0.930, 0.214, and 0.146, respectively)., Conclusion: With a similar radical dissection extent around the tumor rather than dissection of extensive lymph region distal to the lesion, SND is not inferior to CND for patients with NPC with only cervical failure. ECS, rN stage, and positive margins were adverse independent prognostic factors for patients with NPC., Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 129:387-395, 2019., (© 2018 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Objective: To describe the incidence and determinants of survival of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the hard palate (SCCHP) between the years of 1973 to 2014 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database., Methods: Retrospective, population-based cohort study of patients in the SEER tumor registry who were diagnosed with SCCHP from 1973 to 2014. Outcomes and measures included overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS)., Results: A total of 1,489 cases of primary SCCHP were identified. Of those, 53.2% were females and 47.8% presented with stage IV disease. The mean age at diagnosis was 69.8 years. Overall survival at 2, 5, and 10 years was 44%, 33%, and 21%, respectively. A total of 66.2% of patients underwent surgery (with or without radiation therapy [RT]); 20.1% received RT; and 22.4% had both surgical and RT. On multivariate analysis, RT, advanced age, stage, and grade were associated with worse OS and DSS (P < 0.05). Surgical therapy (with or without radiation) was an independent favorable predictor of OS and DSS (P < 0.05)., Conclusion: SCCHP is relatively infrequent tumor that portends an overall poor prognosis when advanced stage and a greater prognosis when early stage. Surgical therapy was found to be an independent predictor for improved OS and DSS, whereas RT was associated with reduced OS and DSS., Level of Evidence: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:2050-2055, 2018., (© 2018 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Objectives/hypothesis: National Cancer Care Network guidelines suggest consideration of adjuvant radiation even for early stage adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary glands. We used the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) to analyze practice patterns and outcomes of postoperative radiotherapy for adenoid cystic carcinomas., Study Design: Retrospective NCDB review., Methods: Patients with nonmetastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma of the parotid, submandibular, or another major salivary gland from 2004 to 2012 were identified. Information was collected regarding receipt of postoperative radiation. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess overall survival and Cox regression analysis to assess impact of covariates., Results: There were 1,784 patients included. Median age was 57 years old and median follow up was 47.5 months. Of the patients, 72.4% of underwent partial/total parotidectomy and 73.6% received postoperative radiation. The 5-year survival was 72.5% for those receiving surgery alone compared to 82.4% for those receiving postoperative radiation (P < .001). On subgroup analysis, this survival difference favoring postoperative radiation was significant for pT1-2N0 (P < .001), pT3-4N0 (P = .047), pTanyN+ (P < .001), and for positive margins (P = .001), but not for negative margins (P = .053). On multivariable analysis, postoperative radiation remained associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.63, 95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.80, P < .001). The utilization of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) increased from 16.9% in 2004 to 56.3% in 2012 (P < .001). There was no survival benefit for IMRT over three-dimensional radiation therapy (HR = 0.84, P = .19)., Conclusions: Postoperative radiation therapy for salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma was associated with improved survival even for those with early-stage disease., Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 127:2057-2062, 2017., (© 2017 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Objective: To analyze the impact of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) on overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) in patients with verrucous carcinoma (VC) as compared to squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral cavity., Study Design: Cross-sectional population analysis., Methods: Cases of nonmetastatic VC/SCC of the oral cavity were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1988-2013). Kaplan-Meier survivals, stratified according to T stage, were compared between VC and SCC for treatment with or without adjuvant RT., Results: A total of 18,819 VC/SCC cases were identified. There were 581 (3.1%) VC (mean age 69.6 years, 48.9% female) versus 18,238 (97.0%) SCC (mean age, 65.3, 37.1% female) patients. Verrucous carcinoma patients receiving surgery alone (N = 539) demonstrated a trend toward improved OS versus VC patients receiving surgery and RT (N = 40) (117.0 vs. 71.4 months, respectively, P = 0.119). There was a statistically significant improvement in DSS in VC patients receiving surgery alone (217.2 vs. 110.9 months, P = 0.05). Verrucous carcinoma patients treated with adjuvant RT demonstrated a trend toward a worse OS (71.4 vs. 93.0 months, P = 0.992) and DSS (110.9 vs. 162.3 months, P = 0.275) compared to SCC treated with adjuvant RT, suggesting a different biology and radiosensitivity between VC and SCC., Conclusion: Verrucous carcinoma treated with adjuvant RT had a worse OS and DSS compared to both VC treated with surgery alone and SCC treated with surgery and adjuvant RT. Consideration should be given to surgical re-section rather than adjuvant RT in patients with positive margins or local recurrence., Level of Evidence: 2C. Laryngoscope, 127:1334-1338, 2017., (© 2017 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)