Search

Objectives: A paucity of literature exists about childbearing during otolaryngology residency. Pregnancy is a common part of many physician life cycles, but the timing of residency and the rigors of surgical training amplify the challenges. This study was designed to understand the experiences of childbearing otolaryngology residents and support them during this major life event. Unique challenges include long training, shortage of role models, combination surgical and clinical work, and higher rates of infertility. Study Design: Qualitative research. IRB exempt. Setting: United States. Methods: To capture modern perspectives, 16 current and former otolaryngology residents that experienced pregnancy and childbirth during residency in all four geographic regions of the United States in the past 10 years were recruited to participate in individual structured qualitative interviews. Results: Although there was significant training program and personal anxiety reported by childbearing otolaryngology residents, many surgeons experienced healthy pregnancies and postpartum recoveries with minimal disruption to clinical productivity and minimal disruption to their training programs. Multiple recurring themes were identified among the participants spanning the entire childbearing process: increased incidence of pregnancy complications and preterm labor, pregnancy stigma from leadership and coresidents, scheduling logistics regarding call and parental leave, and challenging transitions back to clinical work while navigating breastfeeding and childcare. Conclusion: There are actional recommendations that programs can address to make childbearing during residency accessible and acceptable. Understanding these challenges is an important step to encouraging childbearing residents to prosper in academic otolaryngology, increasing the diversity at the highest levels of the field. Level of Evidence: 4. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Surgical education is changing in an era of new regulations and evolving training cultures. We sought to understand the factors that affect operative experiences during otolaryngology residency. Methods: From December 2019 to December 2020, five otolaryngology training programs used the SIMPL OR smartphone application to evaluate residents after each operation. Residents and attendings rated the trainee's autonomy on a 4‐level Zwisch scale, performance on a 5‐level scale, and case complexity on a 3‐level scale. We examined associations between ratings of autonomy and performance with variables including postgraduate year (PGY), case complexity, gender, week of the academic year (AY), and whether multiple procedures were logged. Results: 78 attendings and 92 residents logged 2984 evaluations. PGY level and week of the AY were positively associated with attending ratings of autonomy and performance (PGY3 vs. PGY2: B = 0.63, p <.001 for autonomy and B = 1.05, p <.001 for performance; week of the AY: B = 0.013, p =.002 for autonomy; B = 0.025, p <.001 for performance). Multiple procedures logged and increasing case complexity were negatively associated with attending ratings (multiple procedures: B = −0.19, p =.04 for autonomy and B = −0.48, p <.001 for performance; hardest vs. easiest 1/3 of cases: B = −1.01, p <.001 for autonomy and B = −0.59, p <.001 for performance). Attending and trainee genders were not associated with attending ratings of autonomy or performance. Conclusion: Resident autonomy and performance were positively associated with PGY level and week of the academic year, and negatively associated with case complexity and multiple procedures. These findings highlight the need to align training level with case complexity to promote quality operative experiences. Level of Evidence: 2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: We surveyed otolaryngology program directors (PDs) and recent otolaryngology residency graduates on the operative autonomy of graduating residents and their comfort with independent practice. Methods: An anonymous survey was sent to otolaryngology PDs and recent graduates of training programs (members of the Young Physicians Section [YPS] of the American Academy of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Foundation). Questions were developed around the 14 key indicator procedures (KIPs) defined by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Results: Fifty PDs (43% of PDs) and 152 recent graduates (6% of YPS members) responded. Over 90% of participating PDs felt their graduating residents were either somewhat or extremely comfortable performing 12 out of 14 KIPs. Among the 12 procedures PDs felt their graduating residents were comfortable performing, 57% to 95% of recent graduates also felt either somewhat or extremely comfortable performing them by graduation. Similarly, at least 90% of responding PDs felt their residents achieved meaningful autonomy in the last 2 months of residency prior to graduation for 11 of 14 KIPs. For these same 11 procedures, 74% to 95% of recent graduates indicated they achieved meaningful autonomy. The procedures that PDs and recent graduates felt required the most surgical assistance were ossiculoplasty/stapedectomy, rhinoplasty, and mastoidectomy. All PDs agreed or strongly agreed that graduating residents are comfortable operating and taking call as general otolaryngologists, compared to 86% and 93% of recent graduates. Conclusion: Most PDs and recent graduates agree that residents are well‐prepared for general otolaryngology practice with the exception of select KIPs. Level of evidence: 4. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To determine preference patterns for topical anesthesia in patients undergoing endoscopy pre‐coronavirus (2019 coronavirus disease [COVID‐19]) pandemic and analyze outcomes based on preference, using a decision aid format. Methods: A decision aid was developed with expert and patient input. New patients presenting to subspecialty clinics over a 2‐month pre‐COVID‐19 period completed a pre‐procedure survey about their priorities, then were asked to choose between topical oxymetazoline/lidocaine spray or none. A post‐procedure outcome survey followed. Results: Of 151 patients, 90.1% patients elected to have topical anesthesia. Top patient priorities were "I want the scope to be easy for the doctor" and "I want to be as comfortable as possible." Patients who strongly wanted to avoid medication (P =.002) and bad taste (P =.003) were more likely to select no spray, whereas those who wanted to avoid pain received anesthetic (P =.011). According to the post‐procedure assessment, 95.4% of patients were satisfied or strongly satisfied their choice, and this did not correlate with anesthetic vs none. Conclusions: Patient preferences are easily elicited and correlate with treatment choices. Most patients chose to have topical anesthetic and were willing to tolerate side effects; however, both patients with and without topical anesthetic were satisfied with their choices. This decision aid can be used to optimize shared decision making in the otolaryngology clinic. Given the aerosolizing potential of both spray and no spray conditions, this insight may be consequential when devising office protocols for post‐COVID‐19 practice. Level of evidence: II. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The concept of disease control incorporates independent disease characteristics that are longitudinally reflective of disease status and which can be used to make treatment decisions. Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a chronic condition for which the determination of disease control by both the patient and the treating physician is important. Our objectives were to determine CRS disease characteristics that are associated with patient‐reported and physician‐rated CRS disease control. Study Type: Cross‐sectional. Methods: A total of 209 participants were prospectively recruited. Participants were asked to rate their global level of CRS control as "not at all," "a little," "somewhat," "very," and "completely." All participants completed a 22‐item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT‐22) and also reported the number of sinus infections, CRS‐related antibiotic courses taken, CRS‐related oral corticosteroid courses taken, and missed days of work or school due to CRS, all in the last 3 months. Clinical and demographic characteristics were also collected from each participant. A Lund‐Kennedy endoscopy score was calculated for each participant from nasal endoscopy. Two rhinologists were then given each participant's SNOT‐22 score (as well as SNOT‐22 nasal, sleep, otologic/facial pain, and emotional subdomain scores), endoscopy score, and the number of sinus infections, CRS‐related antibiotics, CRS‐related oral corticosteroid courses and missed days of work or school due to CRS in the preceding 3 months as reported by the patient. The two rhinologists were blinded to all other participant characteristics and each rhinologist independently rated every participant's global control level as "not at all," "a little," "somewhat," "very," and "completely." Associations were sought between CRS disease characteristics (SNOT‐22 score, endoscopy score, sinus infections, CRS‐related antibiotic usage, CRS‐related oral corticosteroid usage, and lost productivity due to CRS) and patient‐reported CRS control as well as mean physician‐rated CRS control. Results: Patient‐reported global CRS control was associated only with SNOT‐22 (adjusted relative risk [RR] = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98–0.99, P < .001) but no other CRS disease characteristic. Patient‐reported CRS control was specifically associated only with nasal symptoms and not extra‐nasal symptoms of CRS. Physician‐rated CRS control was associated with SNOT‐22 score (adjusted RR [for each 1‐unit increase of SNOT‐22] = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98–0.99, P < .001), number of acute bacterial CRS exacerbations—reflected by number of antibiotic courses taken (or sinus infections)—in the last 3 months (adjusted RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82–0.98, P = .014) and the number of CRS‐related oral corticosteroid courses taken in the last 3 months (adjusted RR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78–0.97, P = .012). Nasal, sleep, and otologic/facial pain symptoms were all associated with physician‐rated CRS control. Having used at least one course of antibiotics or oral corticosteroids in the last 3 months was the optimal threshold for detecting poorly controlled CRS. Conclusions: Patients and physicians use different criteria to determine the level of CRS control. While both rely on the burden of CRS symptomatology, patients consider primarily nasal symptoms while physicians include nasal and extra‐nasal symptoms of CRS in determining CRS control. Physicians also independently consider CRS‐related antibiotic use, as a reflection of acute bacterial CRS exacerbations, and CRS‐related oral corticosteroid use in the determination of global CRS control. Level of Evidence: 2c. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]