Search

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of the status of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and HbA1c levels on the efficacy of the subthreshold micropulse laser (SMPL) in the treatment of center-involving diabetic macular edema (DME). A total of 20 eyes of 20 patients (mean age 57.9 ± 9.7 years) who were diagnosed with center-involving DME and treated with SMPL for refusing intravitreal injection and 20 eyes of 20 age- and sex-matched healthy participants were enrolled. All patients were followed up in the 1st and 3rd months after SMPL. For measurement of RPE area central 1000 microns, macular EDI-OCT scans were binarized by using the public domain software ImageJ, with a semi-automated technique. There was a significant increase in BCVA values and a significant decrease in CMT values during follow-up. The area of RPE before SMPL was significantly thinner in the patient group (p: 0.004). When the areas of RPE before and 3 months after SMPL were compared, no significant change was observed (p: 0.437). When the relationship between pre-treatment area of RPE and HbA1c was examined, an inverse correlation was observed (p: 0.018). The patients were evaluated by dividing them into 2 groups as 2nd session SMPL required and not required, and the area of RPE was smaller in the group requiring 2nd session SMPL (p: 0.030). The status of central RPE may be a determining factor on the response to treatment. Additionally, HbA1c levels may have an impact on treatment efficacy.

The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of adjunctive use of laser therapy (LT) alone or antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) to improve clinical periodontal and HbA1c levels in patients with both chronic periodontitis (CP) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Electronic search of the MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Science Direct, and SCOPUS databases were combined with hand searching of articles published from 1975 up to and including March 2016 using relevant MeSH terms. Six studies were selected for this review. In these six studies, laser treatment was applied, after scaling and root planing (SRP), in two ways: Three studies used laser alone and three studies used laser with photosensitizer. All the six included studies reporting clinical periodontal and glycemic parameters showed that LT and aPDT were effective in the treatment of CP in T2DM subjects at follow-up. Two studies showed significantly better periodontal outcomes for LT as an adjunct to SRP as compared to SRP alone, whereas four studies showed comparable periodontal outcomes among adjunctive LT or aPDT with SRP. Two studies showed significant reduction of HbA1c levels in LT and aPDT as compared to SRP, whereas three studies showed comparable percentage levels at follow-up. It remains debatable whether LT or aPDT as adjunct to SRP is more effective as compared to SRP alone in the improvement of clinical periodontal and glycemic control in patients with both CP and T2DM, given that the scientific evidence is weak.