Search

The hypothesis is that, at least in Europe, there is a noted convergence between common and civil law legislative drafting extending from conceptual approaches to actual drafting conventions. The comparative analysis of [statutory] interpretation, modern doctrine of precedent, and drafting rules and conventions in the common and civil laws of Europe paint a clear picture approximation and convergence, to the point where the sacred civil versus common law dividing wall is now critically shaken. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The functional usefulness and need of drafting manuals as a method of harmonization of drafting conventions at the national level has often been linked to the civil versus common law legal traditions. This article places the balance between the virtue of homogeneity of style of national laws (and thus certainty in the law) and dynamism of drafting conventions as legal norms (and hence modernization and approachability) beyond the civil versus common law divide. If drafting is a discipline of law, then it is a form of phronesis. And the series of subjective choices of appropriateness made by the drafters in the course of their work can only be assisted by compilations of drafting conventions that set the foundations of quality in legislation in a theoretical/principled, rather than prescribed, manner. Thus the future of manuals lies in their nature as compilations of principles of legisprudence and not in their regrettable past as a series of commands on techniques and technicalities. This may serve efficacy which is the ultimate goal of legislation as a tool for regulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]