Search

Objectives: The aim of this study was to translate the Stigma Resistance Scale into French and to examine its psychometric qualities to measure stigma resistance in people with psychotic disorders., Methods: The Stigma Resistance Scale was rigorously translated into French, involving translation, back-translation, and adjustments based on focus groups. The French version of the Stigma Resistance Scale comprises 20 items divided into five subscales measuring resistance to stigma at different levels. The psychometric qualities of the French version were assessed in comparison with other scales such as the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness, the Beck Depression Inventory, the Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms, and the Schizophrenia Quality of Life Questionnaire Short Form. The study involved 59 patients with psychotic disorders and was approved by a committee for the protection of individuals. Participants were recruited from seven investigating centers, and data were collected via semi-structured interviews and self-questionnaires., Results: The five-factor structure developed by the original scale for a multi-diagnostic population was not found by confirmatory factor analysis on our sample. An exploratory factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure. Internal consistency, measured by Cronbach's alpha coefficient, was greater than 0.7 in favor of a strong internal consistency of the psychometric instrument. The correlation result obtained with the only instrument measuring stigma resistance (Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness subscale) demonstrated good convergent validity (r=-0.37). Similarly, scores on the Stigma Resistance Scale were strongly correlated with scores on other scales measuring negative symptomatology, depression, quality of life and insight. This demonstrates the satisfactory divergent validity of the instrument., Conclusion: The study aimed to validate the Stigma Resistance Scale in French, revealing a two-factor structure in patients with psychotic disorders. The two dimensions identified reflect a proactive attitude to stigma (egocentrism) and a willingness to defend the rights of people with mental disorders (allocentrism). Cultural factors may explain the differences in the factorial models between the original and French versions. The Stigma Resistance Scale is the first tool validated in the French language to provide a specific self-assessment of stigma resistance with good psychometric properties for patients suffering from psychotic disorders., (Copyright © 2024 L'Encéphale, Paris. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

To correctly interpret the results of a randomised controlled trial (RCT), practitioners have to spot bias and other potential problems present in the trial. Internal as well as external validity of the trial are linked to the presence of such bias. The internal validity is ensured by a clear definition of the objectives of the trial. The number of patients to be included in the trial is calculated on the basis of the main objective of the trial and more precisely on the basis of the primary endpoint selected to assess the efficacy of treatment. This is the best way to ensure that the statistical significance of the result may have a clinical relevance. Internal validity depends also on the process of patients selection, the methods used to ensure comparability of groups and treatments, the criteria employed to assess efficacy, and the methods for the analysis of data. External validity refers to subjects that have been excluded from the trial, limitations of RCTs, as well as the coherence and clinical relevance of the trial. Internal validity has to be fueled by external validity., (© L’Encéphale, Paris, 2016.)

An inventory on the two critical dimensions that structure the Randomized Controlled Trial in Psychiatry, namely the definition of inclusion criteria for eligible patients for testing and the choice of psychometric methods of pathology assessment and its evolution during the experiment, considers the importance of increasingly numerous and precise international recommendations. Taking into account the formal constraints of industrial, questioning the cultural differences of the methodological approach of the tests, meeting the requirements of feasibility and ever increasing security, frequent cumbersome procedure often contrasts with the modest nature of the results. A better definition to include patients in randomized trials is desirable and it asks to return to the clinic studying the expectations of patients and their response to the therapeutic situation. Excessive standardization otherwise required for ensuring the objective nature of the assessment hampers the collection of original and varied clinical features of importance in the further definitions of indications. On the way to a resumption of the single case study, we can expect from qualitative methods applied to small groups of subjects, optimization principles of patient selection for the upcoming randomized trial and greater chance to address the relevant details of clinical response to the therapeutic situation. This is what has led to the discovery of psychotropic drugs and which is involved in the various modalities of the qualitative approach. For example, and beyond the exploration of clinical drug effects, the study of the experience of psychiatric inpatient care in the Healing Garden, conducted on a small group and on the basis of the narrative analysis of their experience, notes several operating thematic dimensions: a reduction in the perception of symptoms of the disease, the impression of regaining a foothold into reality, the interest of a differently perceived doctor-patient relationship, the advantage of renewed power to act and the recognition of the importance of support from others, patients recovering somehow « vitality » of touch with reality. This suggests the possibility to establish an appropriate rating scale for such a specific therapeutic situation and to provide a more accurate and efficient recruitment for a comparative objective demonstration. Moreover, this construction of meaning reinforces the therapeutic benefit of treatment in Healing Garden and offers new dimensions for research., (© L’Encéphale, Paris, 2016.)

Proving the efficacy of a psychotropic drug is a medical, scientific and ethical need. Psychotropic drug development is now a highly complex process, which takes several years and which is very expensive. It involves multiple steps of preclinical and clinical pharmacological refinement and testing. Methodology of studies to prove curative or preventive effect of psychotropic drugs is well codified. Preclinical studies include pharmacokinetic data, toxicology and performance in various animal models of pathology. Clinical phases are centered on randomized controlled double blind trials for demonstrating efficacy and safety/tolerability. This methodology follows strict criteria to avoid bias and to prove internal and external validity of the results. All the results from randomized controlled trials or RCTs lead to different levels of evidence of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM): gold standard is RCTs while the lowest reference is clinical case or expert opinion. However, it is possible to level criticism at these data issued from RCTs. The main matter is that studies do not reflect the healthcare reality in daily life. For these reasons, a real debate between evaluation of efficacy and effectiveness is acute. Effectiveness refers to the overall effects of psychotropic drugs in naturalistic conditions. Furthermore, analysis of costs and financial benefits are more and more important from social and economic points of view. Official agencies and health insurances look after them very carefully. This article deals with these issues and provides examples using data from the international literature. These examples are drawn from RCTs, naturalistic studies, meta-analysis, pharmaco-economic studies and concern neuroleptics, antipsychotics, antidepressants, and mood-stabilizers., (© L’Encéphale, Paris, 2016.)

Theoretical Background: Interpersonal therapy (IPT) is a brief, structured psychotherapy initially intended to treat adult depression that was developed in the 1970s and manualized in 1984 by G. Klerman and his team. Two main theories served as a basis for its design: Bowlby's attachment theory and communication theory. Klerman theorized that tensions and problems in interpersonal relationships (i.e. disputes) cause psychological distress in vulnerable individuals that may lead to a major depressive episode. Clinical and epidemiological studies have shown that an insecure attachment style is strongly associated with lifetime depression. Severe depressive episodes have been correlated with avoidant attachment in women., Therapy Structure and Techniques: IPT is based on the hypothesis that recent or ongoing disturbances in interpersonal relationships either trigger or follow the onset of mood disorder. In practice, IPT assists patients in analysing their interpersonal relationship modes, correlating their relational states with their mood and in learning to use better communication. Resolving difficulties in interpersonal relationships through the use of better communication skills promotes the improvement of depressive symptoms. Klerman identified four interpersonal areas that seem to be highly correlated with depressive episodes: grief (a close and important personal relation who has died), interpersonal disputes (conflicts with significant people such as a spouse or another close family member), role transition (significant life changes such as retirement, parenthood or chronic and invalidating illness) and interpersonal deficits (patients who have limited social contacts and few interpersonal relations). Classically, IPT is planned around 12-16 weekly sessions. During the initial sessions, the therapist will explore all existing interpersonal relations and any significant dysfunctions, both recent and ongoing. Following this interview, the area the patient considers as driving the current depressive episode will be designated as the focus of therapy. Evaluation of depressive symptoms by a quantitative measure (i.e. Visual Analogue Scale) and qualitative measures (activity, pleasure, quality of life) reoccurs at each session. During the intermediate sessions, therapy uses current situations and events in the designated area that particularly affect the patient's mood. Coping, communication and decision-making skills are gradually improved through a number of techniques. These include non-directive and directive exploration, clarification, encouragement of affect, and communication analysis. The therapeutic relationship is empathetic and encouraging of all progress the patient makes. The final phases close the therapy and help the patient to plan future actions and improvements., Clinical Trials of Ipt and Developments: Several controlled clinical trials in adult populations have demonstrated the efficacy of IPT in treating Major Depressive Disorder (initial and recurrent episodes). It has been recommended as an appropriate treatment option in several guidelines. It can be provided in individual, couple or group formats. There remains an ongoing discussion of the efficacy of monthly maintenance sessions in recurrent depression. Since its conception, clinical trials have explored its use in specific populations such as adolescents and the elderly. IPT has also been the object of trial in other disorders such as post-partum depression, bipolar disorder, social phobia and eating disorders., Conclusion: This article reviews the basic principles and objectives of this therapeutic model. Theoretical concepts and results from research are also discussed. The approach is briefly described and the various therapeutic phases are discussed. Clinical trials have shown that IPT is effective in treating major depressive disorder in a wide variety of populations. Further trials are necessary to determine its efficacy in other psychiatric disorders., (Copyright © 2014 L’Encéphale, Paris. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Bipolar disorder is common, recurrent, often severe and debiliting disorder. All types of bipolar disorder have a common determinant: depressive episode. It is justify to propose a psychotherapy which shown efficacy in depression. Howewer, perturbations in circadian rhythms have been implicated in the genesis of each episode of the illness. Biological circadian dysregulation can be encouraged by alteration of time-givers (Zeitgebers) or occurrence of time-disturbers (Zeitstörers). Addition of social rhythm therapy to interpersonal psychotherapy leads to create a new psychotherapy adaptated to bipolar disorders: InterPersonal and Social Rhythm Therapy (IPSRT). IPSRT, in combinaison with medication, has demonstrated efficacy as a treatment for bipolar disorders. IPSRT combines psychoeducation, behavioral strategy to regularize daily routines and interpersonal psychotherapy which help patients cope better with the multiple psychosocial and relationship problems associated with this chronic disorder. The main issues of this psychotherapy are: to take the history of the patient's illness and review of medication, to help patient for "grief for the lost healthy self" translated in the french version in "acceptance of a long-term medical condition", to give the sick role, to examinate the current relationships and changes proximal to the emergence of mood symptoms in the four problem areas (unresolved grief, interpersonal disputes, role transitions, role déficits), to examinate and increase daily routines and social rhythms. French version of IPSRT called TIPARS (with few differences), a time-limited psychotherapy, in 24 sessions during approximatively 6 months, is conducted in three phases. In the initial phase, the therapist takes a thorough history of previous episodes and their interpersonal context and a review of previous medication, provides psychoeducation, evaluates social rhythms, introduces the Social Rhythm Metric, identifies the patient's main interpersonal problem area, and contractualizes the therapy. In the second phase, the therapist focuses work with patient toward regulating the patient's daily routines as well as resolving the interpersonal problem areas relevant to episodes (mainly interpersonal disputes and role transitions). In the third or terminaison phase, the therapist evaluates efficacy of the therapy, enhances the patient's independent functioning and develops strategies for relapse prevention. The further maintenance phase suggests differents strategies as maintenance therapy or focused intensive interventions on specific topics., (Copyright © 2010 L'Encéphale. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Schizophrenic disorders are chronic disorders usually characterized by relapses alternating with periods of remission. A better understanding of the course of schizophrenic disorders is available with the models of psychotic vulnerability and the neurodevelopmental hypothesis. The relapses have numerous severe aspects, clinical, biological and conduct to a bad prognosis. A relapse prevention constitutes a major issue in regard of public health. A relapse prevention is possible with identification of relapse prodromal signs (or early signs of relapse). The relapse prodromal signs are often aspecific but remain stable in each patient. These relapse prodromal signs are similar to the initial prodromal signs, as well as in symptomatology than as their chronologic apparition. Specific psychoeducation strategy allows for each patient to learn its own stressful events and its own prodromal signs of relapse, as well as onset of each prodromal symptoms. A pilot study conducts to a psychoeducative program of relapse prevention centered on learning about prodromal symptoms and validation of a relapse prodromal signs questionnaire.