Search

Autoimmune cytopenias are typical paraneoplastic phenomena in malignant lymphomas. We assessed the occurrence, clinical, and laboratory features as well as the response to treatment of autoimmune hemolytic anemia, autoimmune thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia in published cases of Hodgkin lymphomas (HL). We identified 34 cases of an association between HL and autoimmune hemolytic anemia and 48 cases of an association of autoimmune thrombocytopenia (AITP) and HL. The autoimmune cytopenias (AIC) may occur prior to, concurrent with, at the time of recurrence of lymphoma or in complete remission after treatment. Almost all autoimmune hemolytic anemias were caused by warm antibodies. Patients with HL with AIC are more commonly males and are more likely to have mixed cellularity (MC) HL. HL is the only lymphoma which may be associated with autoimmune neutropenia. In contrast to AIC in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), early stage is less common in patients with HL with AIC. AIC in HL respond better to antilymphoma treatment than to steroids, with the exception of post-treatment AITP in CR of HL which responds easily and durably to steroids.

We analyzed 108 cases of non-CLL non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) associated with autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) (+/- pure red cell aplasia (PRCA)) or Evans' syndrome. The analysis was based on cases reported in the literature, which were retrieved by means of Pubmed and Medline searches and of an original series of 121 patients with NHL as well as reference lists of papers in the field. The number of cases in various NHL subtypes was small (n = 6-25). Nevertheless, interesting and sometimes unexpected differences in sex prevalence, temporal relationship between onset of lymphoma and AIHA, stage of lymphoma, relative frequency of warm antibody-AIHA (WA-AIHA) and cold antibody (CA-AIHA), association with PRCA and response of AIHA to treatments were noted for various lymphoma entities. WA-AIHA was more frequent in B-cell lymphomas, while CA-AIHA and PRCA predominantly occurred in T-cell lymphomas. Anti-lymphoma treatment seemed to be more effective against AIHA than conventional therapy with steroids or immunoglobulin. Although generated by a literature survey, this compilation of data indicates a complex relation of lymphoma and AIHA and warrants more attention and specific studies.

Microvessel density reportedly is increased in various hematologic disorders including acute lymphatic and myeloid leukemias. In these patients the bone marrow microvessel density (BM-MVD) appears to be associated with an unfavorable prognosis. In the present study, we have retrospectively analyzed the BM-MVD (at diagnosis) in 31 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (median age: 38 years; range: 21 – 53 years; f : m-ratio: 1 : 1,4) who underwent conventional chemotherapy and consecutive allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT). The median BM-MVD at diagnosis was 30/mm 2 (range: 17 – 48/mm 2 ) and thus was significantly higher compared to controls (n = 9; BM-MVD: median 7/mm 2 , range 2 – 11/mm 2 ; P 5 0.05). In patients who failed to achieve a complete remission (CR) in response to induction chemotherapy, the BM-MVD was significantly higher (median: 41.5/ mm 2 ) at diagnosis than in patients who entered CR (median: 28.5/mm 2 , P 5 0.05). In addition, patients with high BM-MVD ( 4 30 mm 2 ) had a significantly shorter overall survival compared to patients with a lower BM-MVD ( 5 30 mm 2 , P 5 0.05). Moreover, patients with a high BM-MVD ( 4 30 mm 2 ) were found to have a significantly higher risk of relapse (P 5 0.05). In 4 patients in whom a continuous complete remission was documented after BMT, the BM-MVD levels were analyzed at diagnosis as well as between day + 80 and day + 100 after BMT. In all 4 patients, the BM-MVD was found to decrease in response to BMT until day 100 (P 5 0.05). Together, our data suggest that the BM-MVD could be a prognostic parameter concerning survival in patients with AML undergoing allogeneic BMT.

Remarkable results of the treatment of refractory multiple myeloma with thalidomide have been reported. In most preceding studies, the given thalidomide dose was escalated to a maximum tolerated dose of up to 800 mg/d. The frequency of adverse effects correlates with dose intensity. Since a significant gain of therapeutic effects could not be observed as thalidomide dosage was escalated, the optimal dose of thalidomide remains to be determined. We report the results of a study with low dose thalidomide (median administered dose 100 mg/d, range 50-400 mg/d). Twenty-four relapsed (n = 19) or resistant (n = 5) multiple myeloma patients were included in the study. Twelve patients (50%) received thalidomide as monotherapy, 8 patients (33%) received a combination of thalidomide and dexamethasone (every 4 weeks 40 mg/day for 4 days) and 4 patients (17%) who were resistant to vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone (VAD) received VAD combined with thalidomide. Overall, a response was observed in 12 patients (50%). Of the 12 patients treated with low dose thalidomide alone 5 (42%) responded, of the 8 patients who received a combination of thalidomide and dexamethasone 5 (63%) responded and of the 4 patients who had thalidomide in addition to VAD 2 patients (50%) responded. In 3 patients, thalidomide treatment had to be discontinued because of side effects and 1 patient died before response could be assessed. We conclude that low dose thalidomide is an effective and safe rescue therapy in relapsing or refractory multiple myeloma. Response to thalidomide might be dependent on prognostic parameters and tumor burden. To answer these questions larger prospective studies are necessary.

Although systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a well-defined hematologic neoplasm, it is sometimes difficult to discriminate between SM and a reactive mast cell (MC) hyperplasia. We describe a patient with aplastic anemia who was treated with recombinant stem cell factor (SCF). In response to SCF, the patient showed transient hematologic improvement and developed a marked increase in MC as well as a transient increase in serum tryptase. Histologic and immunohistochemical examination revealed a huge increase in MC in the bone marrow with focal infiltrates similar to SM. However, most of the SM-criteria were not met: First, MC showed normal cytomorphological characteristics without significant atypias (no cytoplasmic extensions, no oval nuclei, no hypogranulated cytoplasm). Furthermore, bone marrow MC were CD2- and CD25-negative and did not exhibit the C-KIT 2468 A--T mutation (Asp-816-Val). After discontinuation of SCF the MC hyperplasia resolved confirming its reactive nature. Based on our case and similar cases mimicking mastocytosis, it seems of importance to apply recently established SM criteria in order to discriminate between reactive MC hyperplasia and true mastocytosis with certainty.

Minimal residual disease in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with inversion(16) can be monitored by CBFbeta/MYH11 RT-PCR. While the association between molecular remission (MR) in bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) and long-term clinical remission (CR) seems to be established, there are insufficient data on the kinetics of CBFbeta/MYH11. We have performed a prospective study in order to generate a reasonable and sufficient schedule for PCR-monitoring. 11 patients with AML and inversion (16) in complete hematological remission have been prospectively monitored by CBFbeta/MYH11 RT-PCR in their BM and PB during an observation period of 7 to 67 months (median 32 months). Patients were followed during consolidation chemotherapy with repetitive cycles of high-dose Ara-C and after autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation in 2nd CR or refractory AML. MR never coincided with achievement of CR but occurred between 2 and 8 months after hematological remission. All patients in continuous CR were PCR-negative after 1-8 (median 4) months. Two patients relapsed despite MR for 10 to 15 months. Molecular relapse preceded hematological relapse by 3 to 5 months. Three out of four patients who were not in MR after 8 months relapsed. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation was able to eradicate minimal residual disease in 4/4 patients. In 2 patients a temporary reconversion to PCR-positivity was reversed by reduction of immunosuppression. 1 patient did not become PCR-negative until compete withdrawal of immunosuppression. We suggest that BM and PB should be examined after the last consolidation treatment. In case of MR, PB should be examined every 1 to 2 months and BM examination should be done only in case of PCR-positivity in PB in order to confirm the molecular relapse and to identify an impending cytogenetic and/or hematological relapse. CBFbeta/MYH11 RT-PCR monitoring is able to predict relapse 3 to 5 months prior to overt hematological relapse, offers a window of opportunity for preemptive therapy of molecular relapse and confers implications for immunotherapy in the setting of allografting.

The benefit of all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) in the front line therapy of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is well established, but its role in postremission therapy and in the treatment of relapse is currently under investigation. Moreover, the impact of cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) in the therapy of APL has been questioned in recent studies. We report a prolonged third molecular remission (MR) in a patient with hyperleukocytotic APL after induction with ATRA, consolidation chemotherapy (CT) with intermittent intermediate dose Ara-C and maintenance therapy with intermittent ATRA. While the first two remissions were relatively short (8 months and 11 months, resp.), the duration of the third continuous CR (49+ months) is more than twice as long as the length of the two previous remissions combined. In this case Ara-C followed by intermittent ATRA maintenance was a safe and effective therapy for relapsed disease. A third molecular remission of such duration and quality is unusual.

Patients with systemic mast cell (MC) disease, but not those with cutaneous mastocytosis, are at a high risk (10-30%) to develop life-threatening myelogenous malignancies. In a significant proportion of cases, myeloid leukemias occur. Using conventional criteria, such leukemias resemble acute myeloid leukemia (AML), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), or myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). Mast cell leukemia (MCL) may also occur. Myeloid leukemias (AML, CML, CMML) can develop in indolent or aggressive mastocytosis (skin lesions present or absent) with a variable prephase of MC disease. By contrast, MCL (typically without skin lesions) often develops on a "de novo" basis, and, if at all recognized, a prephase resembling (malignant) mastocytosis, is short. MCL differs from myeloid leukemias (AML, CML, CMML) by morphologic and phenotypic cellular characteristics. In fact, MCL are strongly tryptase-positive, c-kit-positive, myeloperoxidase (MPO) -negative neoplasms with variable metachromasia and chloroacetate esterase expression, whereas an MPO-positive, tryptase-negative phenotype supports the diagnosis of a myeloid non-MC lineage disease. Thus, MCL, but also myeloid non-MC lineage leukemias can develop in patients with (systemic) mastocytosis. Little is known, however, about the pathophysiologic basis of co-evolution. In the present article, the concomitant occurrence of mastocytosis and leukemia is discussed in the light of the literature and of concepts proposed to explain the biologic basis of this phenomenon.

We report on a 31-year old female patient who relapsed with CML in blast crisis 12 years after a successful BMT for CML in chronic phase from her HLA-identical sister. Because of her good performance status and the long time elapsed since her first BMT, PBPC transplantation of the originial donor was planned. Therefore, the patient was conditioned with busulfan and cyclophosphamide and then received unmanipulated PBPCs from her sister. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of MTX and CsA. She had early engraftment but considerable hepato-toxicity which resolved after more than six months. Furthermore, she developed acute GVHD of the skin grade 2, which responded to corticosteroids. Fifteen months after second transplantation the patient is alive and well in molecular remission and without signs of chronic GVHD.

A 37-year-old man with a newly diagnosed chronic myelogenous leukemia received induction therapy with hydroxyurea and interferon-alpha, and maintenance therapy with low-dose ara-C and interferon-alpha. Subsequent to a rapid hematological remission, a continuously aggravating pancytopenia with bone marrow aplasia developed which persisted after withdrawal of maintenance therapy. Bone marrow examination exhibited aplastic areas and residual hematopoiesis with impaired maturation; cytogenetically, there was a 100% persistence of Philadelphia chromosome-positive metaphases. By allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, a complete reconstitution of hematopoiesis was achieved.

Drug resistance often results in failure of anticancer chemotherapy in leukemias. Several mechanisms of drug resistance are known with multidrug resistance (MDR) being the best characterized one. MDR can be due to enhanced expression of certain genes (MDR1, MRP or LRP), alterations in glutathione-S-transferase activity or GSH levels and to reduction of the amount or the activity of topoisomerase II. Here we review the current status of the clinical significance of the various mechanisms of MDR in leukemias and also discuss possibilities for the reversal of MDR. MDR1 gene expression has been seen in many leukemias, notably in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia. Both MDR1 RNA and P-glycoprotein expression of the leukemic cells have been shown to correlate with poor clinical outcome in AML. However, preliminary results indicate that the MRP gene as well as the LRP gene can be expressed in AML. Thus, drug resistance in leukemias appears to be multifactorial. P-glycoprotein-mediated MDR can be reversed by several drugs. These resistance modifiers are currently evaluated with regard to their clinical efficacy. Despite some encouraging results, reversal of drug resistance and subsequent improvement in clinical outcome remains to be shown.

Mast cells and blood basophils are distinct hemopoietic cells. They can be distinguished from each other and from all other lymphohemopoietic cells using antibodies against surface receptors or stored cytoplasmic molecules. In patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or myeloproliferative syndromes (MPS), an elevation of metachromatically granulated cells (MCS) is frequently seen. These cells can be classified as basophils or mast cells using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against leukocyte antigens, including mast cell tryptase, c-kit (= mast cell growth factor [MGF] receptor), interleukin-3 receptor alpha chain (IL-3R alpha = CD123), and CD11b (C3biR). In a stable phase of MDS or MPS, the circulating MCS usually are basophils (histamine+, tryptase-, c-kit-, IL-3R alpha +, CD11b+). In an accelerated or terminal phase of disease, however, mast cell lineage involvement and circulating mast cell precursors (histamine+, tryptase+, c-kit+, IL-3R alpha-, CD11b-) are found in a subset of patients. The use of mAbs against mast cell antigens and granulocyte antigens is diagnostic in these patients.

In order to confirm our initial report on the negative impact of MDR1 gene expression on the outcome of de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML), we present an update of our prospective study with a larger number of patients and a longer duration of follow-up. At diagnosis, MDR1 RNA expression of the leukemic cells was negative in 37% and positive in 63% of the patients (N = 79). The complete remission rate of induction chemotherapy was 76% for MDR1 RNA negative and 54% for MDR1 RNA positive patients (p = 0.05). At a median observation duration of 33 months, the duration of overall survival was 19 months for the MDR1 RNA negative patients but only 8 months for the patients with MDR1 gene expression (p = 0.02). Thus the long-term data also indicate that MDR1 gene expression is an unfavourable prognostic factor in AML.