1. Comparison of a pediatric-inspired treatment protocol versus standard-intensity chemotherapy for young adults with standard-risk BCR-ABL negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
- Author
-
Kliman D, Barnett M, Broady R, Forrest D, Gerrie A, Hogge D, Nantel S, Narayanan S, Nevill T, Power M, Sanford D, Song K, Sutherland H, Toze C, and Abou Mourad Y
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects, Child, Child, Preschool, Consolidation Chemotherapy, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Maintenance Chemotherapy, Male, Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma diagnosis, Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma mortality, Remission Induction, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma drug therapy
- Abstract
We investigated the utility of a pediatric-inspired protocol in adults aged 18-40 years with standard-risk BCR-ABL negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Retrospective outcomes of 25 patients treated with a pediatric protocol between 2008 and 2014 were compared with 22 similarly aged patients treated with an adult protocol between 2003 and 2008. Twenty-five (100%) and 19 (86%) patients achieved complete remission, respectively. At median follow-up of 36.8 months, 3-year event-free survival was increased in patients on the pediatric protocol at 80% versus 45% (p = .019). There was a trend toward improved overall survival at 80% versus 59% (p = .12). Treatment-related toxicity was not increased despite the increased treatment intensity. Patients with BCR and/or ABL copy number variation demonstrated comparatively poorer outcomes in both cohorts. In our experience with this cohort of patients, pediatric-based protocols are safe and effective, justifying their use in younger adults with ALL.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF