Search

Patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation may be at increased risk of developing gastroesophageal reflux disease. We prospectively studied the presence of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease in naïve patients who underwent atrial fibrillation ablation. Methods: The presence of typical symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux disease was clinically assessed by the gastroenterologist at baseline and at 3 months after ablation. In addition to that, all patients underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Results: Seventy-five patients were included in two groups: 46 patients who underwent atrial fibrillation ablation (study group) and 29 patients without ablation (control group). Patients with atrial fibrillation ablation were younger (57.76 ± 7.66 years versus 67.81 ± 8.52 years; p = 0.001), predominantly male (62.2% versus 33.3%; p = 0.030) and with higher body mass index (28.96 ± 3.12 kg/m2 versus 26.81 ± 5.19 kg/m2; p = 0.046). At three months after the ablation, in the study and control groups, there were 88.9% and 57.1% patients in sinus rhythm, respectively, (p = 0.009). Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease was not more frequent in the study group (42.2% versus 61.9%; p = 0.220). There was no difference in terms of sinus rhythm prevalence in patients with versus without symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (89.5% versus 88.5%; p = 0.709). Conclusion: In this small prospective study, typical symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux disease were not more frequent three months following atrial fibrillation ablation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Globally, metabolic diseases such as obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease pose a major public health threat. Many studies have confirmed the causal relationship between risk factors and the etiopathogenesis of these diseases. Despite this, traditional therapeutic management methods such as physical education and diet have proven insufficient. Recently, researchers have focused on other potential pathways for explaining the pathophysiological variability of metabolic diseases, such as the involvement of the intestinal microbiota. An understanding of the relationship between the microbiome and metabolic diseases is a first step towards developing future therapeutic strategies. Currently, much attention is given to the use of biotics family members such as prebiotics (lactolose, soy oligosaccharides, galactooligosaccharides, xylooligosaccharides or inulin) and probiotics (genera Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Lactococcus, Streptococcus or Enterococcus). They can be used both separately and together as synbiotics. Due to their direct influence on the composition of the intestinal microbiota, they have shown favorable results in the evolution of metabolic diseases. The expansion of the research area in the biotics family has led to the discovery of new members, like postbiotics. In the age of personalized medicine, their use as therapeutic options is of great interest to our study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]