Search

Summary: The melting temperature difference between poly(propylene) (PP) fibre and random poly(propylene-co‐ethylene) (PPE) was exploited to establish processing conditions for all‐PP composite. Under these conditions, the matrix must be liquid to ensure good wetting and impregnation of fibres, though temperatures must be low enough to avoid melting of fibres. The high chemical compatibility of the two components allowed creation of strong physico‐chemical interactions, favouring strong interfacial adhesion. Static and dynamic mechanical properties and morphology of all‐PP composites were investigated according to method of preparation and compared with the behaviour of hot compacted composites, prepared under different moulding conditions. The composites were compacted with varying pressure and time, and mechanical and thermal properties of the resulting sheets were measured. With increased moulding time, more fibres melted or their original properties deteriorated. Fast cooling or quenching caused imperfect morphology. Moulding pressure played an important role. Morphology of the optimum hot compacted composite was investigated using scanning electron microscopy before and after tensile testing. Tensile fracture surfaces showed a melted phase epitaxially crystallised onto the remaining orientated phase. Compacted composites showed fibre shapes under a thin layer of PPE with all of the gaps between fibres filled by melted PPE matrix.SEM of compacted all-PP composite without quenching.