1. Impact of Plasmodium falciparum gene deletions on malaria rapid diagnostic test performance
- Author
-
Yong Ah, Rosalynn Ord, Scott Wilson, Qin Cheng, Jeff Glenn, Sandra Incardona, Michael Aidoo, Alisha Chaudhry, Roxanne R. Rees-Channer, Peter L. Chiodini, Jane Cunningham, Amy Kong, and Michelle L. Gatton
- Subjects
lcsh:Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine ,lcsh:RC955-962 ,Plasmodium falciparum ,HRP2 ,Protozoan Proteins ,Antigens, Protozoan ,Gene Deletions ,lcsh:Infectious and parasitic diseases ,parasitic diseases ,medicine ,lcsh:RC109-216 ,Hisidine rich protein 2 ,Malaria, Falciparum ,Rapid diagnostic test ,biology ,Gene deletion ,Diagnostic Tests, Routine ,business.industry ,Research ,Rapid diagnostic tests ,Diagnostic test ,medicine.disease ,biology.organism_classification ,equipment and supplies ,Virology ,Infectious Diseases ,Parasitology ,business ,Malaria - Abstract
Background Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have greatly improved access to diagnosis in endemic countries. Most RDTs detect Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2), but their sensitivity is seriously threatened by the emergence of pfhrp2-deleted parasites. RDTs detecting P. falciparum or pan-lactate dehydrogenase (Pf- or pan-LDH) provide alternatives. The objective of this study was to systematically assess the performance of malaria RDTs against well-characterized pfhrp2-deleted P. falciparum parasites. Methods Thirty-two RDTs were tested against 100 wild-type clinical isolates (200 parasites/µL), and 40 samples from 10 culture-adapted and clinical isolates of pfhrp2-deleted parasites. Wild-type and pfhrp2-deleted parasites had comparable Pf-LDH concentrations. Pf-LDH-detecting RDTs were also tested against 18 clinical isolates at higher density (2,000 parasites/µL) lacking both pfhrp2 and pfhrp3. Results RDT positivity against pfhrp2-deleted parasites was highest (> 94%) for the two pan-LDH-only RDTs. The positivity rate for the nine Pf-LDH-detecting RDTs varied widely, with similar median positivity between double-deleted (pfhrp2/3 negative; 63.9%) and single-deleted (pfhrp2-negative/pfhrp3-positive; 59.1%) parasites, both lower than against wild-type P. falciparum (93.8%). Median positivity for HRP2-detecting RDTs against 22 single-deleted parasites was 69.9 and 35.2% for HRP2-only and HRP2-combination RDTs, respectively, compared to 96.0 and 92.5% for wild-type parasites. Eight of nine Pf-LDH RDTs detected all clinical, double-deleted samples at 2,000 parasites/µL. Conclusions The pan-LDH-only RDTs evaluated performed well. Performance of Pf-LDH-detecting RDTs against wild-type P. falciparum does not necessarily predict performance against pfhrp2-deleted parasites. Furthermore, many, but not all HRP2-based RDTs, detect pfhrp2-negative/pfhrp3-positive samples, with implications for the HRP2-based RDT screening approach for detection and surveillance of HRP2-negative parasites.
- Published
- 2020