1. Application of Six Detection Methods for Analysis of Paralytic Shellfish Toxins in Shellfish from Four Regions within Latin America
- Author
-
Andrew D. Turner, Alejandra B. Goya, Frances M. Van Dolah, Maria Salhi, Benjamin A. Suarez-Isla, Robert G. Hatfield, Maggie Broadwater, Dinorah Medina, Fernanda Barrera, Mickael Teixeira-Alves, Ignacio Rubilar, D. Carrasco, Sophie Tarnovius, Ernesto García-Mendoza, Turner A. D., Tarnovius S., Hatfield R. G., Alves M. T., Broadwater M., Van Dolah F., Garcia-Mendoza E., Medina Dinorah, DINARA, Salhi María, Universidad de la República (Uruguay). Facultad de Ciencias. Instituto de Ecología y Ciencias Ambientales. DINARA, Goya A. B., Barrera F., Carrasco D., Rubilar I., and Suarez-Isla B. A.
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,toxin profiles ,Latin Americans ,MBA ,Pharmaceutical Science ,Biology ,RBA ,01 natural sciences ,Article ,Mice ,Mouse bioassay ,Paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) ,Tandem Mass Spectrometry ,Toxicity Tests ,Drug Discovery ,Lc ms ms ,medicine ,Animals ,Paralysis ,Shellfish Poisoning ,False Positive Reactions ,paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) ,LC-MS/MS ,Paralytic shellfish poisoning ,lcsh:QH301-705.5 ,Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous) ,Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid ,Shellfish ,Replacement method ,business.industry ,010604 marine biology & hydrobiology ,010401 analytical chemistry ,Reproducibility of Results ,Reference Standards ,Toxin profiles ,medicine.disease ,Bivalvia ,0104 chemical sciences ,Shellfish poisoning ,Biotechnology ,Latin America ,lcsh:Biology (General) ,Biological Assay ,Marine Toxins ,LC-FLD ,business - Abstract
With the move away from use of mouse bioassay (MBA) to test bivalve mollusc shellfish for paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) toxins, countries around the world are having to adopt non-animal-based alternatives that fulfil ethical and legal requirements. Various assays have been developed which have been subjected to single-laboratory and multi-laboratory validation studies, gaining acceptance as official methods of analysis and approval for use in some countries as official control testing methods. The majority of validation studies conducted to date do not, however, incorporate shellfish species sourced from Latin America. Consequently, this study sought to investigate the performance of five alternative PSP testing methods together with the MBA, comparing the PSP toxin data generated both qualitatively and quantitatively. The methods included a receptor binding assay (RBA), two liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection (LC-FLD) methods including both pre-column and post-column oxidation, liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and a commercial lateral flow assay (LFA) from Scotia. A total of three hundred and forty-nine shellfish samples from Argentina, Mexico, Chile and Uruguay were assessed. For the majority of samples, qualitative results compared well between methods. Good statistical correlations were demonstrated between the majority of quantitative results, with a notably excellent correlation between the current EU reference method using pre-column oxidation LC-FLD and LC-MS/MS. The LFA showed great potential for qualitative determination of PSP toxins, although the findings of high numbers of false-positive results and two false negatives highlighted that some caution is still needed when interpreting results. This study demonstrated that effective replacement methods are available for countries that no longer wish to use the MBA, but highlighted the importance of comparing toxin data from the replacement method using local shellfish species of concern before implementing new methods in official control testing programs.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF