Search

The arithmetic optimization algorithm is a recently proposed metaheuristic algorithm. In this paper, an improved arithmetic optimization algorithm (IAOA) based on the population control strategy is introduced to solve numerical optimization problems. By classifying the population and adaptively controlling the number of individuals in the subpopulation, the information of each individual can be used effectively, which speeds up the algorithm to find the optimal value, avoids falling into local optimum, and improves the accuracy of the solution. The performance of the proposed IAOA algorithm is evaluated on six systems of nonlinear equations, ten integrations, and engineering problems. The results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms other algorithms in terms of convergence speed, convergence accuracy, stability, and robustness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Metaheuristic optimization is considered one of the most efficient and powerful techniques of recent decades as it can deal effectively with complex optimization problems. The performance of the optimization technique relies on two main components: exploration and exploitation. Unfortunately, the performance is limited by a weakness in one of the components. This study aims to tackle the issue with the exploration of the existing jellyfish search optimizer (JSO) by introducing a hybrid jellyfish search and particle swarm optimization (HJSPSO). HJSPSO is mainly based on a JSO structure, but the following ocean current movement operator is replaced with PSO to benefit from its exploration capability. The search process alternates between PSO and JSO operators through a time control mechanism. Furthermore, nonlinear and time-varying inertia weight, cognitive, and social coefficients are added to the PSO and JSO operators to balance between exploration and exploitation. Sixty benchmark test functions, including 10 CEC-C06 2019 large-scale benchmark test functions with various dimensions, are used to showcase the optimization performance. Then, the traveling salesman problem (TSP) is used to validate the performance of HJSPSO for a nonconvex optimization problem. Results demonstrate that compared to existing JSO and PSO techniques, HJSPSO contributes in terms of exploration and exploitation improvements, where it outperforms other well-known metaheuristic optimization techniques that include a hybrid algorithm. In this case, HJSPSO secures the first rank in classical and large-scale benchmark test functions by achieving the highest hit rates of 64% and 30%, respectively. Moreover, HJSPSO demonstrates good applicability in solving an exemplar TSP after attaining the shortest distance with the lowest mean and best fitness at 37.87 and 36.12, respectively. Overall, HJSPSO shows superior performance in solving most benchmark test functions compared to other optimization techniques, including JSO and PSO. As a conclusion, HJSPSO is a robust technique that can be applied to solve most optimization problems with a promising solution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Moth-flame optimization (MFO) is a prominent problem solver with a simple structure that is widely used to solve different optimization problems. However, MFO and its variants inherently suffer from poor population diversity, leading to premature convergence to local optima and losses in the quality of its solutions. To overcome these limitations, an enhanced moth-flame optimization algorithm named MFO-SFR was developed to solve global optimization problems. The MFO-SFR algorithm introduces an effective stagnation finding and replacing (SFR) strategy to effectively maintain population diversity throughout the optimization process. The SFR strategy can find stagnant solutions using a distance-based technique and replaces them with a selected solution from the archive constructed from the previous solutions. The effectiveness of the proposed MFO-SFR algorithm was extensively assessed in 30 and 50 dimensions using the CEC 2018 benchmark functions, which simulated unimodal, multimodal, hybrid, and composition problems. Then, the obtained results were compared with two sets of competitors. In the first comparative set, the MFO algorithm and its well-known variants, specifically LMFO, WCMFO, CMFO, ODSFMFO, SMFO, and WMFO, were considered. Five state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms, including PSO, KH, GWO, CSA, and HOA, were considered in the second comparative set. The results were then statistically analyzed through the Friedman test. Ultimately, the capacity of the proposed algorithm to solve mechanical engineering problems was evaluated with two problems from the latest CEC 2020 test-suite. The experimental results and statistical analysis confirmed that the proposed MFO-SFR algorithm was superior to the MFO variants and state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms for solving complex global optimization problems, with 91.38% effectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]