Search

Hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) is a common clinical problem that may have a very negative impact on a woman's quality of life. Diagnosis and treatment is challenging, as one must keep in mind the complex web of factors influencing sexual functioning alone or in concert. Data suggest that androgens are significant independent factors affecting sexual desire, sexual activity and satisfaction, as well as other components of women's health such as mood and energy. For decades, physicians used various androgen preparations to improve sexual function in women, based on the results of smaller clinical trials and personal clinical observations when taking care of patients. Today, there is substantial body of evidence from randomized placebo-controlled trials that low-dose testosterone treatment is efficacious in women with HSDD who have an established cause of androgen deficiency such as surgical menopause. Recent data support the hypotheses that androgens may also be beneficial in naturally menopausal women or in premenopausal women with low circulating testosterone levels and a decrease in satisfying sexual activity. No single testosterone level has been found to be predictive for low female sexual function, even though women suffering from HSDD commonly have low testosterone levels. The most frequently reported side effects of testosterone treatment are mild hirsutism or acne. Long-term safety is not yet established. Several clinical trials are in progress to further investigate potential benefits and risks of androgen treatment in women with sexual dysfunction.

In the past, medical attitudes to female sexuality were grotesque, reflecting the anxiety and hypocrisy of the times. In the medieval world, the population feared hunger, the devil, and women, being particularly outraged and threatened by normal female sexuality. The 19th century attitude was no better as academics confirmed the lower intellectual status of women, particularly if they ventured into education. The medical contribution to this prejudice was shocking, with gynaecologists and psychiatrists leading the way designing operations for the cure of the apparently serious contemporary disorders of masturbation and nymphomania. The gynaecologist, Isaac Baker Brown (1811-1873), and the distinguished endocrinologist, Charles Brown-Séquard (1817-1894) advocated clitoridectomy to prevent the progression to masturbatory melancholia, paralysis, blindness and even death. Even after the public disgrace of Baker Brown in 1866-1867, the operation remained respectable and widely used in other parts of Europe. This medical contempt for normal female sexual development was reflected in public and literary attitudes. There is virtually no novel or opera in the last half of the 19th century where the heroine with "a past" survives to the end. The wheel has turned full circle and in the last 50 years new research into the sociology, psychology and physiology of sexuality has provided a greater understanding of decreased libido and inadequate sexual response in the form of hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD). This is now regarded as a disorder worthy of treatment.

Objective: To study the efficacy and tolerability of Aerodiol, a novel intranasal estradiol spray, and to determine an appropriate dose range., Methods: An exploratory, parallel-group, dose-finding study was followed by a large-scale, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. In the exploratory study, 134 postmenopausal women were allocated to receive a daily dose of 100--900 microg of Aerodiol for 12 weeks. Efficacy was determined by an overall assessment of estrogenization. In the placebo-controlled study, 420 postmenopausal women were randomized to receive 100, 200, 300, or 400 microg of Aerodiol, or oral estradiol 1 or 2 mg, or placebo, daily for 12 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by the Kupperman Index and the number of hot flushes per day after 12 weeks., Results: In the exploratory study, the level of estrogenization was sufficient for 23% of women in the 100 microg/day group, excessive for 36% of the 900 microg/day group, and good for more than 80% of women receiving 200--600 microg/day. In the placebo-controlled study, the Kupperman Index at week 12 was significantly lower than placebo (P<0.01) for all Aerodiol groups except the 100 microg/day group. The efficacy of Aerodiol 300 microg/day was similar to oral estradiol 2 mg/day. The variability in exposure to estradiol was lower with Aerodiol than with oral estradiol. Aerodiol therapy was well tolerated in both studies. Premature withdrawals were approximately equally distributed among treatment groups in the placebo-controlled study., Conclusions: Aerodiol was effective in reducing climateric symptoms at doses between 100 and 600 microg/day. Treatment was well tolerated and well accepted. A dose of 300 microg/day is recommended for initiating hormone replacement therapy.

Objectives: The objectives were to compare the local skin tolerability of a matrix-type estradiol transdermal system, Oesclim 50, with that of the reservoir-type system, Estraderm TTS 50., Methods: Two randomised studies were performed. In the first study, the modified Draize-Shelanski-Jordan method of sensitization was used in an open, parallel-group trial to compare the cutaneous tolerability of repeated applications of Oesclim 50 with that of Estraderm TTS 50 in 24 healthy postmenopausal women. The second study was an open, randomised, parallel-group, multi-centre clinical trial involving 283 healthy menopausal women. A total of 143 women were allocated to treatment with Oesclim 50 and 140 to Estraderm TTS 50. The treatment duration was four months., Results: The first study showed that the treatments, Oesclim 50 and Estraderm TTS 50, had no sensitizing potential and did not induce allergic reactions. In the second study, 4.2% of applications in the Oesclim group provoked reactions compared with 9.5% in the Estraderm group (P < 0.001). Thirty-seven patients (25.9%) treated with Oesclim and 55 patients (39.9%) receiving Estraderm experienced one or more reactions (P < 0.05). Redness and itching were the most frequent types of application site reaction in both treatment groups. The durations of the reactions were significantly shorter in the Oesclim group (P < 0.01), with a higher percentage of durations of less than 1 h and a lower percentage of durations of over 48 h than in the Estraderm TTS 50 group. None of the reactions in the Oesclim group led to premature removal of the patch, compared with 11 (3.4%) in the Estraderm group (P < 0.05). The number of patients who discontinued treatment due to application site reactions was one (0.7%) in the Oesclim group and seven (5.1%) in the Estraderm group (P < 0.05). Efficacy and general safety were comparable in the two treatment groups., Conclusions: In the first study, neither Oesclim nor Estraderm induced allergic reactions. In the second study, the local skin tolerability of Oesclim was significantly better than that of Estraderm, in terms of the number, duration and severity of the application site reactions.

Objectives: The objectives were to compare the tolerability, adhesion and efficacy of a new matrix-type estradiol transdermal system, Oesclim 50, with those of Estraderm TTS 50, a reservoir-type system., Methods: This was an open, randomised, parallel-group, multi-centre clinical trial, performed in six European countries. A total of 143 healthy menopausal women were allocated to treatment with Oesclim 50 and 140 to Estraderm TTS 50. The transdermal systems were applied twice weekly for 24 days out of each 28-day cycle, over a period of four cycles. Oral progestogen treatment was taken by non-hysterectomised patients for the last 12 days of estrogen therapy in each cycle., Results: The local skin tolerability of the Oesclim 50 transdermal system was significantly better than that of Estraderm TTS 50. In the Oesclim 50 group, 4.2% of applications caused a reaction, compared with 9.5% in the Estraderm TTS 50 group (P < 0.001). Safety assessments showed both treatments to be well tolerated. Seven patients in the Oesclim 50 group, and 12 in the Estraderm TTS 50 group, discontinued due to adverse events. Of these discontinuations, one (0.7% of patients) in the Oesclim 50 group and seven (5.1% of patients) in the Estraderm TTS 50 group were due to application site reactions (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the percentage of patients with signs of hyperestrogenism (29 patients (20.3%) in the Oesclim group and 28 patients (20.0%) in the Estraderm TTS 50 group). Adhesion was significantly better for the Oesclim 50 transdermal system, with 6.0% of Oesclim 50 applications becoming detached compared with 11.3% of Estraderm TTS 50 applications (P < 0.001). The greater adhesion of Oesclim 50 was particularly apparent when the systems were exposed to water, with three times fewer Oesclim 50 systems becoming detached during a shower or bath (P < 0.001 in each case). Both treatments produced significant and comparable improvements in vasomotor symptoms, other menopausal symptoms and gynaecological assessments. A near-maximal effect on vasomotor symptoms was observed after approximately 1 month of treatment, and was maintained for the entire treatment period., Conclusion: Overall, Oesclim 50 provided statistically significantly better local skin tolerability and adhesion than Estraderm TTS 50, together with comparable efficacy and safety.