1. Levonorgestrel Contraceptive Implants in Female Patients 14 to 21 Years Old
- Author
-
Jo T. Van Winter, Vera J. Suman, Steven J. Jacobsen, Patricia S. Simmons, Mary P. Evans, and Amy L. Manolis
- Subjects
Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,Population ,Levonorgestrel ,Pregnancy ,Contraceptive Agents, Female ,medicine ,Humans ,Young adult ,education ,Retrospective Studies ,education.field_of_study ,Obstetrics ,business.industry ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Contraception ,Family planning ,Female ,Implant ,Contraceptive implant ,business ,Developed country ,medicine.drug - Abstract
To determine which factors are associated with duration of use of a levonorgestrel implant (Norplant) for contraception in adolescents and young adults.We retrospectively studied 144 young women (14 to 21 years of age) who chose a levonorgestrel contraceptive implant at Mayo Clinic Rochester between April 1990 and December 1993.The following information was obtained at the time of insertion of the implant and from any follow-up visits: demographics, prior contraceptive experiences, frequency and management of complications, complications noted at removal of the implant, and subsequent contraceptive choice. The duration of use was examined.Of the 144 young women who underwent insertion of a Norplant system, 75 telephoned or made a medical appointment because of implant-related side effects. During the follow-up period, 64 patients had the Norplant system removed. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the probability of the Norplant system remaining in place for at least 12 months was 83 % and for at least 24 months was 63 %. Duration of Norplant use was not found to differ with respect to age, prior contraceptive use, or timing of insertion, but it was significantly shorter among those with a prior pregnancy than in those who had never been pregnant.These findings suggest that a group of young women who are likely to continue use of a contraceptive implant (with or without treatment for side effects) are those who have never been pregnant.A retrospective study of 144 US women 14-21 years of age who requested and received the Norplant contraceptive implant system at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota) in 1990-93 analyzed the factors associated with duration of method use. Of the 124 women who reported past use of contraception, 94 (76%) had been pregnant at least once. The method most commonly used before Norplant was oral contraception (57%). The reasons for Norplant selection were its convenience (86%) and problems tolerating the pill (14%). Of the 130 Norplant users who either telephoned or made a clinic appointment after insertion, 60% reported side effects such as breakthrough bleeding, headache, and depression or mood swings. 64 women had the implants removed. The median duration of Norplant use was 29 months. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the probability of the Norplant system remaining in place for at least 12 months was 83% and 63% for at least 24 months. Age, prior contraceptive use, and timing of insertion had no impact on duration of Norplant use. Multivariate analysis indicated that women with at least 1 prior pregnancy had a two-fold increased risk of Norplant removal compared to those who had never been pregnant. Larger studies are needed to identify additional factors associated with long-term use of injectable contraception among young women and to suggest interventions that would improve compliance with routine follow-up.
- Published
- 1998