1. Effects of 4 hand-drying methods for removing bacteria from washed hands: a randomized trial
- Author
-
Myron D. Maker, Daniel R. Gustafson, Dirk R. Larson, Emily A. Vetter, Duane M. Ilstrup, Rodney L. Thompson, and Franklin R. Cockerill
- Subjects
Adult ,Paper ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Colony Count, Microbial ,Pilot Projects ,Soaps ,Bacterial counts ,Statistics, Nonparametric ,medicine ,Humans ,Food science ,Prospective Studies ,Forced-air ,Desiccation ,biology ,business.industry ,Air ,Textiles ,General Medicine ,biology.organism_classification ,Hand ,Surgery ,Micrococcus luteus ,Room air distribution ,Colony count ,business ,Bacteria ,Hand Disinfection - Abstract
• O b j e c t i v e: To evaluate the effects of 4 different drying methods to remove bacteria from washed hands. • Subjects and Methods : One hundred adult volunteers participated in this randomized prospective study. All bacterial counts were determined using a modified glove-juice sampling procedure. The difference was determined between the amounts of bacteria on hands artificially contaminated with the bacterium Micrococcus luteus before washing with a nonantibacterial soap and after drying by 4 different methods (cloth towels accessed by a rotary dispenser, paper towels from a stack on the hand-washing sink, warm forced air from a mechanical handactivated dryer, and spontaneous room air evaporation). The results were analyzed using a nonparametric analysis (the Friedman test). By this method, changes in bacterial colonyforming unit values for each drying method were ranked for each subject. • Results: The results for 99 subjects were evaluable. No statistically significant differences were noted in the numbers of colony-forming units for each drying method (P=.72). • Conclusion: These data demonstrate no statistically significant differences in the efficiency of 4 different hand-drying methods for removing bacteria from washed hands.
- Published
- 2000