1. Impact of Adherence to Quality Measures for Localized Prostate Cancer on Patient-reported Health-related Quality of Life Outcomes, Patient Satisfaction, and Treatment-related Complications.
- Author
-
Sohn, William, Resnick, Matthew J, Greenfield, Sheldon, Kaplan, Sherrie H, Phillips, Sharon, Koyama, Tatsuki, Goodman, Michael, Hamilton, Ann S, Hashibe, Mia, Hoffman, Karen E, Paddock, Lisa E, Stroup, Antoinette M, Wu, Xiao-Cheng, Penson, David F, and Barocas, Daniel A
- Subjects
Humans ,Prostatic Neoplasms ,Treatment Outcome ,Prospective Studies ,Quality of Life ,Aged ,Middle Aged ,Reimbursement ,Incentive ,Patient Satisfaction ,Male ,Comparative Effectiveness Research ,Self Report ,Patient Safety ,Aging ,Cancer ,Prostate Cancer ,Pain Research ,Urologic Diseases ,Clinical Research ,Health Services ,Chronic Pain ,Behavioral and Social Science ,Management of diseases and conditions ,7.1 Individual care needs ,Good Health and Well Being ,prostate cancer ,quality ,health-related quality of life ,patient-centered ,PQRS ,Public Health and Health Services ,Applied Economics ,Health Policy & Services - Abstract
Background and objectiveQuality measures used in pay-for-performance systems are intended to address specific quality goals, such as safety, efficiency, effectiveness, timeliness, equity, and patient-centeredness. Given the small number of narrowly focused measures in prostate cancer care, we sought to determine whether adherence to any of the available payer-driven quality measures influences patient-centered outcomes, including health-related quality of life (HRQOL), patient satisfaction, and treatment-related complications.MethodsThe Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Surgery and Radiation study is a population-based, prospective cohort study that enrolled 3708 men with clinically localized prostate cancer during 2011 and 2012, of whom 2601 completed the 1-year survey and underwent complete chart abstraction. Compliance with 6 quality indicators endorsed by national consortia was assessed. Multivariable regression was used to determine the relationship between indicator compliance and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) instrument summary scores, satisfaction scale scores (service satisfaction scale for cancer care), and treatment-related complications.ResultsOverall rates of compliance with these quality measures ranged between 64% and 88%. Three of the 6 measures were weakly associated with 1-year sexual function and bowel function scores (β=-4.6, 1.69, and 2.93, respectively; P≤0.05), whereas the remaining measures had no significant relationship with patient-reported HRQOL outcomes. Satisfaction scores and treatment-related complications were not associated with quality measure compliance.ConclusionsCompliance with available nationally endorsed quality indicators, which were designed to incentivize effective and efficient care, was not associated with clinically important changes in patient-centered outcomes (HRQOL, satisfaction, or complications) within 1-year.
- Published
- 2016