Search

Oligometastatic breast cancer patients can today could benefit from a multimodal approach, combining systemic therapy with metastasis-directed treatment using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). However, the possibility to synchronously treat multiple lesions is still challenging, needing the ability to generate complex dose distributions with steep dose gradients outside the lesions and major sparing of surrounding organs at risk and accurately track and reproduce the patient's position before and during radiation therapy. We report the case of an oligometastatic patient from left breast cancer, which occurred after a full course of whole breast radiotherapy, treated using the potential of modern technology including single-isocenter setup, plan automation, breath-hold technique and surface guided tracking and reproducibility of patient's position before and during radiation therapy. A 44-year-old female patient with a history of left breast cancer, specifically a luminal-B-like invasive ductal carcinoma with Her2 overexpression, was admitted to our department. The patient previously underwent a left mastectomy (pT2N0M0), 4 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy on the chest wall and lymph nodes drainage, and 5 years of hormonal therapy. A chest wall ultrasound and positron emission tomography revealed the presence of new lesions in the area of the surgical scar from the previous mastectomy, internal mammary, axillary and retropectoral levels. The 3 lesions were simultaneously treated with a mono-isocentric VMAT plan using SBRT technique with a total dose of 30 Gy delivered in 5 fractions. Due to the technical challenges, this treatment was supported by the use of planning automation, breath-hold technique and surface-guided radiation therapy to improve the accuracy of the dose delivery. Two different plans were generated and compared to pursue the best dosimetric result, including a summed plan obtained from 3 individual SBRT plans for each lesion with a separate isocenter placed in each of them (MIP), and a single-isocenter SBRT plan able to treat multiple lesions synchronously (SIP). Because of the advantages in terms of dosimetry and dose delivery efficiency, the patient was successfully treated with the SIP plan. The treatment time was reduced to about 4.5 minutes, allowing the comfortably use of breath-hold technique. After treatment, the condition of the patient was normal, and no toxicities have been observed in follow-up. SBRT with mono isocentric VMAT planning represents the recommended approach to simultaneously treat multiple lesions in close proximity in the thoracic district., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Significant improvements in plan quality using automated planning have been previously demonstrated. The aim of this study was to develop an optimal automated class solution for stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) planning of prostate cancer using the new Feasibility module implemented in the pinnacle evolution. Twelve patients were retrospectively enrolled in this planning study. Five plans were designed for each patient. Four plans were automatically generated using the 4 proposed templates for SBRT optimization implemented in the new pinnacle evolution treatment planning systems, differing for different settings of dose-fallout (low, medium, high and veryhigh). Based on the obtained results, the fifth plan (feas) was generated customizing the template with the optimal criteria obtained from the previous step and integrating in the template the "a-priori" knowledge of OARs sparing based on the Feasibility module, able to estimate the best possible dose-volume histograms of OARs before starting optimization. Prescribed dose was 35 Gy to the prostate in 5 fractions. All plans were generated with a full volumetric-modulated arc therapy arc and 6MV flattening filter-free beams, and optimized to ensure the same target coverage (95% of the prescription dose to 98% of the target). Plans were assessed according to dosimetric parameters and planning and delivery efficiency. Differences among the plans were evaluated using a Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance. The requests for more aggressive objectives for dose falloff parameters (from low to veryhigh) translated in a statistically significant improvement of dose conformity, but at the expense of a dose homogeneity. The best automated plans in terms of best trade-off between target coverage and OARs sparing among the 4 plans automatically generated by the SBRT module were the high plans. The veryhigh plans reported a significant increase of high-doses to prostate, rectum, and bladder that was considered dosimetrically and clinically unacceptable. The feas plans were optimized on the basis on high plans, reporting significant reduction of rectum irradiation; Dmean, and V18 decreased by 19% to 23% (p = 0.031) and 4% to 7% (p = 0.059), respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in femoral heads and penile bulb irradiation for all dosimetric metrics. feas plans showed a significant increase of MU/Gy (mean: 368; p = 0.004), reflecting an increased level of fluence modulation. Thanks to the new efficient optimization engines implemented in pinnacle evolution (L-BFGS and layered graph), mean planning time was decreased to less than 10 minutes for all plans and all techniques. The integration of dose-volume histograms a-priori knowledge provided by the feasibility module in the automated planning process for SBRT planning has shown to significantly improve plan quality compared to generic protocol values as inputs., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interests The author declares no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Secondary cancer risk is a significant concern for women treated with breast radiation therapy due to improved long-term survival rates. We evaluated the potential of new advanced automated planning algorithms together with hybrid techniques to minimize the excess absolute risk (EAR) for secondary cancer in various organs after radiation treatment for early staged breast cancer. Using CT data set of 25 patients, we generated 4 different radiation treatment plans of different complexity, including 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), field-in-field (FinF), hybrid-IMRT (HMRT) and automated hybrid-VMAT (HVMAT) techniques. The organ-equivalent dose (OED) was calculated from differential dose-volume histograms on the basis of the "linear-exponential," "plateau," and "full mechanistic" dose-response models and was used to evaluate the EAR for secondary cancer in the contralateral breast (CB), contralateral lung (CL), and ipsilateral lung (IL). Statistical comparisons of data were performed by a Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance. The planning objectives were fulfilled with all the planning techniques for both target coverage and organs-at-risk sparing. The differences in EAR for CB, CL and IL secondary tumor induction were not significant among the 4 techniques. For the CB and CL, the mean absolute difference did not reach 1 case of 10000 patient-years. For the IL, the mean absolute difference was up to 5 cases of 10,000 patient-years. In conclusion, the automated HVMAT technique allows an EAR reduction at the level of well-consolidated tangential 3D-CRT or FinF techniques, keeping all the HVMAT dosimetric improvements unchanged. On the basis of this analysis, the adoption of the HVMAT technique poses no increase in EAR and could be considered safe also for younger patients., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest All authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) has been shown to improve the overall survival for invasive breast cancer patients. However, it represents a challenging treatment geometry and individualized planning strategies with complex field arrangements are usually adopted to decrease radiotoxicity to heart and lungs. Automated treatment planning has the potential to improve plan quality consistency and planning efficiency. Herein, we describe the application of the Pinnacle 3 Autoplanning engine as a valuable technological resource able to allow the treatment of challenging patients theoretically unfit for radiotherapy for major cardiac and pulmonary comorbidities. Treatment was planned for three left-sided chest wall and regional lymph-nodes postmastectomy breast cancer patients. A deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique was used aiming to reduce the OARs irradiation. Three manually generated plans (hybrid-IMRT (HMRT), hybrid-VMAT (HVMAT) and full VMAT (MP-VMAT) and a fully automated plan created by the Autoplanning engine (AP-VMAT) were optimized in order to ensure a safe radiation therapy to the patients. The plans were evaluated based on planning target volumes (PTVs) coverage, dose homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CN), dose to organs at risk (OARs) and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) of pericarditis, long term mortality and pneumonitis. Despite the use of deep moderated breath-hold, all human-driven plans failed to reach the stringent dose objectives for OARs. All plans provided an optimal coverage for chest wall and lymph-nodal area. AP-VMAT delivered the lowest mean dose to the heart (3.4 to 4.9 Gy) and ipsilateral lung (7.5 to 12.5 Gy) reporting the lowest NTCP for pneumonitis (<1%), confirming the only chance to comply the dose objectives. Moreover, AP-VMAT reported a decrease of the integral dose, which was lower by about 4-8% with respect to manual plans. AP-VMAT plan resulted in up to 58% increase of MUs with respect to manual plans, suggesting a more pronounced fluence modulation and plan complexity. A major difference was found for the planning time which was reduced to less than 30 minutes by using the Auto-Planning module. With improved planning quality and efficiency, Auto-planning is an effective tool to enable high-quality plans in challenging postmastectomy breast cancer radiotherapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest There are no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2021 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We evaluate the role of stereotactic body radiotherapy using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique as an alternative to high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in the treatment of vaginal cuff in postoperative endometrial cancer. CT scans of 8 patients were used in this study. The clinical target volume (CTV) was defined as the 0.5 cm tissue around the applicator (then subtracting the applicator). Total dose was 30Gy delivered in 5 fractions. In HDR-BT, dose was prescribed at a distance of 0.5 cm from the surface applicator. For VMAT irradiation, a planning target volume (PTV) was obtained from CTV by an expansion of 3 mm. Two VMAT plans were generated using a full arc rotation. The first plan was optimized with an anatomy-based optimization module (PO-VMAT) using a 1mm multileaf collimator beam margin to enhance dose heterogeneity and dose fallout outside the target. The second plan was generated with a full-inverse planning module (FI-VMAT). Conformity (CI100, CI50, CI25), gradient (GI) indexes, and integral doses were calculated. To account for various dose heterogeneity distributions we calculated the equivalent uniform dose (EUD) using the Niemerko model. A Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance followed by Dunn's-type multiple comparisons was performed. Dose distributions were more heterogeneous with HDR-BT: Dmean was 144.2% of prescription dose for CTV in HDR-BT and 118.5 and 108.6% for PTV in PO-VMAT and FI-VMAT, respectively. The mean values of EUD for CTV were 136.9%, 130.0 %, and 111.0% of prescription dose in HDR-BT, PO-VMAT, and FI-VMAT plans, respectively. GI indexes were 2.81, 3.41, and 4.14 for HDR-BT, PO-VMAT, and FI-VMAT, respectively. Near-maximal doses (D0.1cc) for rectum and bladder were significantly higher in HDR-BT plans compared to PO-VMAT and FI-VMAT plans (rectum: 131.2% vs112.8% vs 112.0%, respectively; bladder: 129.2% vs 108.7%, and 109.8%, respectively). PO-VMAT plans were able to mimic the HDR-BT dose distribution, showing a successful capability of highly conformal dose distribution, EUD values similar to HDR-BT, and steep dose-gradient outside PTV, then providing a reasonable alternative to brachytherapy., Competing Interests: Competing Interest None, (Copyright © 2020 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Radical radiotherapy of prostate cancer requires a relatively high dose to achieve an optimal tumor control probability and a reduced dose to the critical structures related to the sexual function (S&#95;OARs) in order to avoid erectile dysfunction. The aim of this study was to perform a planning feasibility analysis of a 3-level dose prescription with Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) on the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) and with S&#95;OARs sparing., Material and Methods: Twelve patients with clinically localized intermediate risk prostate cancer were included. The prostate, seminal vescicles, and DIL Clinical Target Volumes were delineated on rigid fused MRI-CT simulation images using mp-MRI as a separate guide. A 5 mm margin was added to define the PTVs. Penile bulb (PB), corpora cavernosa (CC), internal pudendal arteries (IPAs) and neurovascular bundles were contoured as S&#95;OARs. The following doses were prescribed in 25 fractions: 56.25 Gy to PTVsv, 67.50 Gy to PTVp, and 75 Gy to PTVdil. Standard plans (SD-VMAT) were created to fulfil targets coverage and Quantec constraints for conventional OARs (SD&#95;OARs: rectum, bladder, and femoral heads). For each patient, a new "sexual-sparing" plan (SS-VMAT) was created adding new objectives for S&#95;OARs with priority to minimize mean doses to IPAs, CC, and PB. Dose-volume histogram end points were compared between the 2 plans using Wilcoxon test., Results: D 98% were >95% of prescribed doses for all targets and techniques. No significant differences were found in sparing SD&#95;OARs for considered metrics. Regarding S&#95;OARs, SS&#95;VMAT plans provided a significant reduction of the dose. Mean dose reduction for IPAs, CC, PB, and neurovascular bundles was 32.4% (11.2 Gy, p = 0.002), 22.5% (4.1 Gy, p = 0.006), 10.0% (4.6 Gy, p = 0.010), and 2.6% (1.8 Gy, p = 0.020), respectively., Conclusions: We showed that a significant dose sparing for S&#95;OARs using VMAT-SIB strategy is feasible allowing "sexual-sparing" and highly conformal plans with dose escalation to the DIL., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

We explored the Pareto fronts mathematical strategy to determine the optimal block margin and prescription isodose for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatments of liver metastases using the volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique. Three targets (planning target volumes [PTVs] = 20, 55, and 101 cc) were selected. A single fraction dose of 26 Gy was prescribed (prescription dose [PD]). VMAT plans were generated for 3 different beam energies. Pareto fronts based on (1) different multileaf collimator (MLC) block margin around PTV and (2) different prescription isodose lines (IDL) were produced. For each block margin, the greatest IDL fulfilling the criteria (95% of PTV reached 100%) was considered as providing the optimal clinical plan for PTV coverage. Liver D mean , V7Gy, and V12Gy were used against the PTV coverage to generate the fronts. Gradient indexes (GI and mGI), homogeneity index (HI), and healthy liver irradiation in terms of D mean , V7Gy, and V12Gy were calculated to compare different plans. In addition, each target was also optimized with a full-inverse planning engine to obtain a direct comparison with anatomy-based treatment planning system (TPS) results. About 900 plans were calculated to generate the fronts. GI and mGI show a U-shaped behavior as a function of beam margin with minimal values obtained with a +1 mm MLC margin. For these plans, the IDL ranges from 74% to 86%. GI and mGI show also a V-shaped behavior with respect to HI index, with minimum values at 1 mm for all metrics, independent of tumor dimensions and beam energy. Full-inversed optimized plans reported worse results with respect to Pareto plans. In conclusion, Pareto fronts provide a rigorous strategy to choose clinical optimal plans in SBRT treatments. We show that a 1-mm MLC block margin provides the best results with regard to healthy liver tissue irradiation and steepness of dose fallout., (Copyright © 2017 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We reported our initial experience in using Elekta volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and an anatomy-based treatment planning system (TPS) for single high-dose radiosurgery (SRS-VMAT) of liver metastases. This study included a cohort of 12 patients treated with a 26-Gy single fraction. Single-arc VMAT plans were generated with Ergo++ TPS. The prescription isodose surface (IDS) was selected to fulfill the 2 following criteria: 95% of planning target volume (PTV) reached 100% of the prescription dose and 99% of PTV reached a minimum of 90% of prescription dose. A 1-mm multileaf collimator (MLC) block margin was added around the PTV. For a comparison of dose distributions with literature data, several conformity indexes (conformity index [CI], conformation number [CN], and gradient index [GI]) were calculated. Treatment efficiency and pretreatment dosimetric verification were assessed. Early clinical data were also reported. Our results reported that target and organ-at-risk objectives were met for all patients. Mean and maximum doses to PTVs were on average 112.9% and 121.5% of prescribed dose, respectively. A very high degree of dose conformity was obtained, with CI, CN, and GI average values equal to 1.29, 0.80, and 3.63, respectively. The beam-on-time was on average 9.3 minutes, i.e., 0.36min/Gy. The mean number of monitor units was 3162, i.e., 121.6MU/Gy. Pretreatment verification (3%-3mm) showed an optimal agreement with calculated values; mean γ value was 0.27 and 98.2% of measured points resulted with γ < 1. With a median follow-up of 16 months complete response was observed in 12/14 (86%) lesions; partial response was observed in 2/14 (14%) lesions. No radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) was observed in any patients as well no duodenal ulceration or esophagitis or gastric hemorrhage. In conclusion, this analysis demonstrated the feasibility and the appropriateness of high-dose single-fraction SRS-VMAT in liver metastases performed with Elekta VMAT and Ergo++ TPS. Preliminary clinical outcomes showed a high rate of local control and minimum incidence of acute toxicity., (Copyright © 2016 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) allowed the simultaneous delivery of different doses to different target volumes within a single fraction, an approach called simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). As consequence, the fraction dose to the boost volume can be increased while keeping low doses to the elective volumes, and the number of fractions and overall treatment time will be reduced, translating into better radiobiological effectiveness. In recent years, volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has been shown to provide similar plan quality with respect to fixed-field IMRT but with large reduction in treatment time and monitor units (MUs) number. However, the feasibility of VMAT when used with SIB strategy has few investigations to date. We explored the potential of VMAT in a SIB strategy for complex cancer sites. A total of 15 patients were selected, including 5 head-and-neck, 5 high-risk prostate, and 5 rectal cancer cases. Both a double-arc VMAT and a 7-field IMRT plan were generated for each case using Oncentra MasterPlan treatment planning system for an Elekta Precise linac. Dosimetric indexes for targets and organs at risk (OARs) were compared based on dose-volume histograms. Conformity index, homogeneity index, and dose-contrast index were used for target analyses. The equivalent uniform doses and the normal tissue complication probabilities were calculated for main OARs. MUs number and treatment time were analyzed to score treatment efficiency. Pretreatment dosimetry was performed using 2-dimensional (2D)-array dosimeter. SIB-VMAT plans showed a high level of fluence modulation needed for SIB treatments, high conformal dose distribution, similar target coverage, and a tendency to improve OARs sparing compared with the benchmark SIB-IMRT plans. The median treatment times reduced from 13 to 20 minutes to approximately 5 minutes for all cases with SIB-VMAT, with a MUs reduction up to 22.5%. The 2D-array ion-chambers' measurements reported an agreement of more than 95% for a criterion of 3% to 3mm. SIB-VMAT was able to combine the advantages of conventional SIB-IMRT with its highly conformal dose distribution and OARs sparing and the advantages of 3D-conformal radiotherapy with its fast delivery., (© 2013 Published by American Association of Medical Dosimetrists on behalf of American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.)

The aim of this study was to report the feasibility of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in the postoperative irradiation of the vaginal vault. Moreover, the VMAT technique was compared with 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and fixed-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), in terms of target coverage and organs at risk sparing. The number of monitor units and the delivery time were analyzed to score the treatment efficiency. All plans were verified in a dedicated solid water phantom using a 2D array of ionization chambers. Twelve patients with endometrial carcinoma who underwent radical hystero-adenexectomy and fixed-field IMRT treatments were retrospectively included in this analysis; for each patient, plans were compared in terms of dose-volume histograms, homogeneity index, and conformity indexes. All techniques met the prescription goal for planning target volume coverage, with VMAT showing the highest level of conformity at all dose levels. VMAT resulted in significant reduction of rectal and bladder volumes irradiated at all dose levels compared with 3D-CRT. No significant differences were found with respect to IMRT. Moreover, a significant improvement of the dose conformity was reached by VMAT technique not only at the 95% dose level (0.74 vs. 0.67 and 0.62) but also at 50% and 75% levels of dose prescription. In addition, VMAT plans showed a significant reduction of monitor units by nearly 28% with respect to IMRT, and reduced treatment time from 11 to <3 minutes for a single 6-Gy fraction. In conclusion, VMAT plans can be planned and carried out with high quality and efficiency for the irradiation of vaginal vault alone, providing similar or better sparing of organs at risk to fixed-field IMRT and resulting in the most efficient treatment option. VMAT is currently our standard approach for radiotherapy of low-risk endometrial cancer., (Copyright © 2013 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The accuracy and reproducibility of endometrial carcinoma treatment with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was assessed by means of in vivo dosimetry. Six patients who had previously undergone radical hysterectomy for endometrial carcinoma were treated with IMRT using a vaginal applicator with radio-opaque fiducial markers. An ion-chamber inserted into the applicator supplied an endocavitary in vivo dosimetry for quality assurance purposes. The ratio R = D/D(TPS) between the in vivo measured dose D and the predicted dose by the treatment planning system D(TPS) was determined for every fraction of the treatment. Results showed that 90% and 100% of the ratios resulted equal to 1 within 5% and 10%, respectively. The mean value of the ratios distribution for the 6 patients was R = 0.995 and the SD = 0.034. The ratio R* between the measured and predicted total doses for each patient was near to 1, within 2%. The dosimetric results suggest that the use of a vaginal applicator in an image-guided approach could make the interfractions target position stable and reproducible, allowing a safe use of the IMRT technique in the treatment of postoperative vaginal vault. In vivo dosimetry may supply useful information about the discrimination of random vs. systematic errors. The workload is minimum and this in vivo dosimetry can be applied also in the clinical routine., (Copyright © 2011 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study was to compare intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with 3D conformal technique (3D-CRT), with respect to target coverage and irradiation of organs at risk for high dose postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) of the prostate fossa. 3D-CRT and IMRT treatment plans were compared with respect to dose to the rectum and bladder. The dosimetric comparison was carried out in 15 patients considering 2 different scenarios: (1) exclusive prostate fossa irradiation, and (2) pelvic node irradiation followed by a boost on the prostate fossa. In scenario (1), a 3D-CRT plan (box technique) and an IMRT plan were calculated and compared for each patient. In scenario (2), 3 treatment plans were calculated and compared for each patient: (a) 3D-CRT box technique for both pelvic (prophylactic nodal irradiation) and prostate fossa irradiation (3D-CRT only); (b) 3D-CRT box technique for pelvic irradiation followed by an IMRT boost to the prostatic fossa (hybrid 3D-CRT and IMRT); and (c) IMRT for both pelvic and prostate fossa irradiation (IMRT only). For exclusive prostate fossa irradiation, IMRT significantly reduced the dose to the rectum (lower Dmean, V50%, V75%, V90%, V100%, EUD, and NTCP) and the bladder (lower Dmean, V50%, V90%, EUD and NTCP). When prophylactic irradiation of the pelvis was also considered, plan C (IMRT only) performed better than plan B (hybrid 3D-CRT and IMRT) as respect to both rectum and bladder irradiation (reduction of Dmean, V50%, V75%, V90%, equivalent uniform dose [EUD], and normal tissue complication probability [NTCP]). Plan (b) (hybrid 3D-CRT and IMRT) performed better than plan (a) (3D-CRT only) with respect to dose to the rectum (lower Dmean, V75%, V90%, V100%, EUD, and NTCP) and the bladder (Dmean, EUD, and NTCP). Postoperative IMRT in prostate cancer significantly reduces rectum and bladder irradiation compared with 3D-CRT., (Copyright © 2011 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We evaluated a step-and-shoot IMRT plan in the postoperative irradiation of the vaginal vault compared with equispaced beam arrangements (3-5) 3D-radiotherapy (RT) optimized plans. Twelve patients were included in this analysis. Four plans for each patient were compared in terms of dose-volume histograms, homogeneity index (HI), and conformity index (CI): (1) 3 equispaced beam arrangement 3D-RT; (2) 4 equispaced beam arrangement 3D-RT; (3) 5 equispaced beam arrangement 3D-RT; (4) step-and-shoot IMRT technique. CI showed a good discrimination between the four plans. The mean scores of CI were 0.58 (range: 0.38-0.67) for the 3F-CRT plan, 0.58 (range: 0.41-0.66) for 4F-CRT, 0.62 (range: 0.43-0.68) for 5F-CRT and 0.69 (range: 0.58-0.78) for the IMRT plan. A significant improvement of the conformity was reached by the IMRT plan (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). As expected, the increment of 3D-CRT fields was associated with an improvement of target dose conformity and homogeneity; on the contrary, in the IMRT plans, a better conformity was associated to a worse target dose homogeneity. A significant reduction in terms of D(mean), V90%, V95%, V100% was recorded for rectal and bladder irradiation with the IMRT plan. Surprisingly, IMRT supplied a significant dose reduction also for rectum and bladder V30% and V50%. A significant dosimetric advantage of IMRT over 3D-RT in the adjuvant treatment of vaginal vault alone in terms of treatment conformity and rectum and bladder sparing is shown., (2010 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)