1. A framework for combining a motion atlas with non-motion information to learn clinically useful biomarkers: Application to cardiac resynchronisation therapy response prediction
- Author
-
Christopher A. Rinaldi, Tom Jackson, Daniel Rueckert, Myrianthi Hadjicharalambous, Matthew Sinclair, Wenjia Bai, Liia Asner, Jacobus Bernardus Ruijsink, David Nordsletten, Andrew P. King, and Devis Peressutti
- Subjects
Computer science ,Health Informatics ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Displacement (vector) ,Motion (physics) ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ,Machine Learning ,Electrocardiography ,Motion ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Computer vision ,Sensitivity (control systems) ,Heart Failure ,Multiple kernel learning ,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology ,Cardiac cycle ,business.industry ,Atlas (topology) ,Supervised learning ,Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design ,Ensemble learning ,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,cardiovascular system ,Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition ,Artificial intelligence ,business ,Biomarkers - Abstract
We present a framework for combining a cardiac motion atlas with non-motion data. The atlas represents cardiac cycle motion across a number of subjects in a common space based on rich motion descriptors capturing 3D displacement, velocity, strain and strain rate. The non-motion data are derived from a variety of sources such as imaging, electrocardiogram (ECG) and clinical reports. Once in the atlas space, we apply a novel supervised learning approach based on random projections and ensemble learning to learn the relationship between the atlas data and some desired clinical output. We apply our framework to the problem of predicting response to Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT). Using a cohort of 34 patients selected for CRT using conventional criteria, results show that the combination of motion and non-motion data enables CRT response to be predicted with 91.2% accuracy (100% sensitivity and 62.5% specificity), which compares favourably with the current state-of-the-art in CRT response prediction.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF