Search

Background: It is presently unclear whether the hemodynamic response to intubation is less marked with indirect laryngoscopy using the GlideScope (GlideScope) than with direct laryngoscopy using the Macintosh laryngoscope. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine whether using the GlideScope lowers the hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation more than using the Macintosh laryngoscope. Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature search of electronic databases for clinical trials comparing hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. The primary aim was to determine whether the heart rate (HR) and mean blood pressure (MBP) 60 s after tracheal intubation with the GlideScope were lower than after intubation with the Macintosh laryngoscope. We expressed pooled differences in HR and MBP between the devices as the weighted mean difference with 95% confidence interval and also performed trial sequential analysis (TSA). Second, we examined whether use of the GlideScope resulted in lower post-intubation hemodynamic responses at 120, 180, and 300 s compared with use of the Macintosh laryngoscope. For sensitivity analysis, we used a multivariate random effects model that accounted for within-study correlation of the longitudinal data. Results: The literature search identified 13 articles. HR and MBP at 60 seconds post-intubation was not significantly lower with the GlideScope than with the Macintosh (HR vs MBP: weighted mean difference = 0.22 vs 2.56; 95% confidence interval −3.43 to 3.88 vs −0.82 to 5.93; P = .90 vs 0.14; I2 = 77% vs 63%: Cochran Q, 52.7 vs 27.2). Use of the GlideScope was not associated with a significantly lower HR or MBP at 120, 180, or 300 s post-intubation. TSA indicated that the total sample size was over the futility boundary for HR and MBP. Sensitivity analysis indicated no significant association between use of the GlideScope and a lower HR or MBP at any measurement point. Conclusions: Compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope, the GlideScope did not lower the hemodynamic response after tracheal intubation. Sensitivity analysis results supported this finding, and the results of TSA suggest that the total sample size exceeded the TSA monitoring boundary for HR and MBP.

Rationale: With Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) being the most common and most severe type of muscular dystrophy, DMD patients are at risk for complications from general anesthesia due to impaired cardiac and respiratory functions as the pathological condition progresses. In recent years, advances in multidisciplinary treatment have improved the prognosis of DMD patients, and the number of patients requiring surgery has increased. Remimazolam is a benzodiazepine derivative similar to midazolam. Its circulatory stability and the fact that it has an antagonist make it superior to propofol. There are no reports of pediatric patients with DMD undergoing total intravenous anesthesia with remimazolam. Patient concerns: A 4-year boy was scheduled for single-incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for inguinal hernia under general anesthesia, but the surgery was postponed because his serum creatine phosphokinase level was extremely high. Diagnosis: He was diagnosed with DMD. According to the results of the genetic test, exon deletion of the DMD gene was detected using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, although he had no symptoms of DMD except for elevated serum levels of creatine phosphokinase, etc. Intervention: He was admitted for the same surgical purpose. Anesthesia was induced with 3 mg of intravenously administered remimazolam. He lost the ability to respond to verbal commands. After the intravenous administration of 100 μg of fentanyl, a continuous infusion of remifentanil (1.0 μg/kg/min) and remimazolam (15 mg/h) was started, and the endotracheal tube was inserted smoothly after the administration of 10 mg of rocuronium with which the muscle twitches disappeared in train-of-four monitoring. At the end of the surgery, 15 mg of flurbiprofen was administered intravenously. After surgery, we injected 40 mg of sugammadex to confirm a train-of-four count of 100%. Outcomes: Although the dose of remimazolam was reduced to 5 mg/h 30 minutes before the end of the surgery, it took 20 minutes after the discontinuation of remimazolam for the patient to open his eyes upon verbal command. On postoperative Day 2, he was discharged from the hospital without any complications. Lessons: Remimazolam was shown to be safe to use for general anesthesia in a pediatric patient with DMD.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text, Accumulation of the literature has suggested an inverse association between healthcare provider volume and mortality for a wide variety of surgical procedures. This study aimed to perform meta-analysis of meta-analyses (umbrella review) of observational studies and to summarize existing evidence for associations of healthcare provider volume with mortality in major operations. We searched MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library, and screening of references. Meta-analyses of observational studies examining the association of hospital and surgeon volume with mortality following major operations. The primary outcome is all-cause short-term morality after surgery. Meta-analyses of observational studies of hospital/surgeon volume and mortality were included. Overall level of evidence was classified as convincing (class I), highly suggestive (class II), suggestive (class III), weak (class IV), and non-significant (class V) based on the significance of the random-effects summary odds ratio (OR), number of cases, small-study effects, excess significance bias, prediction intervals, and heterogeneity. Twenty meta-analyses including 4,520,720 patients were included, with 19 types of surgical procedures for hospital volume and 11 types of surgical procedures for surgeon volume. Nominally significant reductions were found in odds ratio in 82% to 84% of surgical procedures in both hospital and surgeon volume-mortality associations. To summarize the overall level of evidence, however, only one surgical procedure (pancreaticoduodenectomy) fulfilled the criteria of class I and II for both hospital and surgeon volume and mortality relationships, with a decrease in OR for hospital (0.42, 95% confidence interval[CI] [0.35–0.51]) and for surgeon (0.38, 95% CI [0.30–0.49]), respectively. In contrast, most of the procedures appeared to be weak or “non-significant.” Only a very few surgical procedures such as pancreaticoduodenectomy appeared to have convincing evidence on the inverse surgeon volume-mortality associations, and yet most surgical procedures resulted in having weak or “non-significant” evidence. Therefore, healthcare professionals and policy makers might be required to steer their centralization policy more carefully unless more robust, higher-quality evidence emerges, particularly for procedures considered as having a weak or non-significant evidence level including total knee replacement, thyroidectomy, bariatric surgery, radical cystectomy, and rectal and colorectal cancer resections.