1. Enhanced recovery care versus traditional care following laminoplasty: A retrospective case-cohort study
- Author
-
Zheng-kuan Xv, Qun-fei Yu, Fangcai Li, Jun Li, Qixin Chen, Jian Wang, Gang Chen, Hao Li, and Ying Ren
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Catheters ,complications ,Visual analogue scale ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Urinary system ,Observational Study ,Perioperative Care ,Laminoplasty ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Postoperative Complications ,Clinical Protocols ,Patient Education as Topic ,medicine ,Humans ,Pain Management ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,business.industry ,Mortality rate ,cervical ,Retrospective cohort study ,General Medicine ,Perioperative ,Length of Stay ,Middle Aged ,Surgery ,enhanced recovery after surgery ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Cervical Vertebrae ,Observational study ,Female ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Cohort study ,Research Article ,hospitalization - Abstract
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been shown to shorten length of hospital stay and reduce perioperative complications in many types of surgeries. However, there has been a paucity of research examining the application of ERAS to major spinal surgery. The current study was performed to compare complications and hospital stay after laminoplasty between an ERAS group and a traditional care group. The ERAS group included 114 patients who underwent laminoplasty managed with an ERAS protocol between January 2016 and June 2017. The traditional care group included 110 patients, who received traditional perioperative care between November 2014 and December 2015. Postoperative hospital stay (POPH), physiological function, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, and postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups. The mean POPH was significantly shorter in the ERAS group than traditional care group (5.75 ± 2.46 vs. 7.67 ± 3.45 d, P
- Published
- 2018