Search

Background: Presently, hip arthroscopy is a widely adopted surgical intervention for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). However, there is insufficient evidence regarding which between arthroscopy and nonoperative treatment is more optimal for symptomatic FAI. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies that compared arthroscopy and nonoperative interventions for FAI treatment from inception to August 4, 2020. We included studies that directly compared surgical and nonsurgical treatment for symptomatic FAI and excluded those that did not use arthroscopic treatment as a surgical technique and studies performed on patients with concomitant diagnoses instead of pure FAI. We compared the following clinical outcome scores at 6 and 12 months of follow-up: International Hip Outcome Tool 33 (iHOT-33), hip outcome score (HOS), EuroQol-visual analog scale (EQ-VAS), modified Harris hip score (mHHS), and nonarthritic hip score (NAHS). Results: Five studies totaling 838 patients were included in the qualitative and quantitative synthesis; 382 patients underwent hip arthroscopy, and 456 patients were treated by nonoperative interventions. At 6 months of follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences in iHOT-33 ratings (mean difference [MD] = 7.92, P = .15), HOS (MD of HOS-ADL = 5.15, P = .26 and MD of HOS-Sports = 2.65, P = .79, respectively), and EQ-VAS (MD = 1.22, P = .76) between the 2 treatment strategies. At 12 months of follow-up, the arthroscopy group had a greater mean improvement in iHOT-33 score than the conservative treatment group (MD = 8.42, P = .002), but there was no difference between the groups in terms of mHHS rating (MD = −0.24, P = .83) and NAHS (MD = −2.08, P = .09). Conclusion: Despite arthroscopy being associated with significantly superior iHOT-33 scores after 12 months of follow-up, we were unable to discern the difference between the treatment strategies using other scoring methods, such as HOS, EQ-VAS, mHHS, and NAHS. Further studies will be needed to conclusively determine if 1 strategy is superior to the other for treating FAI.

Lower extremity (LEx) edema is a common complication in gynecologic cancer patients. There are 2 main causes of edema in these patients such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and lymphedema. Early diagnosis and treatment of DVT are certainly important, but it is often difficult to evaluate proximal DVT by using ultrasound. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the usefulness of computed tomography venography of the lower extremity (CTV LEx) for the diagnosis of the DVT and investigate predictive factor of DVT in gynecologic cancer patients with LEx edema. The medical records of 415 gynecologic cancer patients who were referred to the department of rehabilitation medicine with LEx edema were retrospectively reviewed in this case-controlled study. We categorized CTV LEx findings as follows: DVT proximal to the inguinal ligament (inferior vena cava or iliac vein thrombosis) and DVT distal to the inguinal ligament (femoral, popliteal, or calf vein thrombosis). We also evaluated patient characteristics including d-dimer level. We analyzed the correlation of each factor with DVT frequency and used receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to determine the appropriate d-dimer threshold. Sixty-six patients were diagnosed with DVT; of them, 35 (53%) had DVT proximal to the inguinal ligament. Twenty-two patients were diagnosed with pulmonary embolism, of whom 15 had proximal DVT. Patients with proximal DVT tended to have pulmonary embolism (P

Rationale: Paraneoplastic syndrome is a very rare syndrome among prostate cancer patients. In particular, paraneoplastic sensorimotor neuropathy has never been reported as a complication of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Patient concerns: A 75-year-old man who was diagnosed with prostatic adenocarcinoma with multiple metastases received cancer treatment. But, numbness and tingling sensations in both sides of the upper and lower limbs got progressively worse. Diagnosese: He was diagnosed with positive anti-Hu antibodies paraneoplastic sensorimotor polyneuropathy caused by prostatic adenocarcinoma. Interventions: The patient received physical therapy, occupational therapy, and opioid medication during 3 weeks at cancer rehabilitation department during 3 weeks. Outcomes: There was no improvement in functional outcome in this patient. But, the patient's neuropathic pain was improved by the use of opioid agents. Lessons: This case report is the first to report anti-Hu antibody-positive paraneoplastic sensorimotor neuropathy in a patient with adenocarcinoma of the prostate.