Search

Purpose: Altitude training is a common strategy used with the intent to increase hemoglobin mass (Hb mass ) in athletes. However, if the Hb mass is increased during altitude camps, it seems to decline rapidly upon returning to sea level. This study aimed to examine the efficacy of three weekly heat training sessions over a 3.5-wk period after a 3-wk altitude camp on the maintenance of Hb mass in elite cyclists., Methods: Eighteen male cyclists (maximal oxygen consumption: 76 ± 5 mL·min -1 ·kg -1 ) underwent a 3-wk altitude training camp at ~2100 m above sea level. After the camp, participants were divided into one group performing three weekly heat sessions that were subtracted from their usual training (HEAT) while the other continuing usual training (CON). Training characteristics were recorded during the intervention, whereas hematological measurements were recorded before the camp as well as 2 d and 3.5 wk after the altitude camp., Results: The 3-wk altitude camp led to an overall increase in total Hb mass of 4.1%. Afterward, HEAT maintained Hb mass (0.2%, P = 0.738), whereas CON group experienced a significant reduction (-3.3%, P < 0.001) (ΔHEAT vs ΔCON, P < 0.001). Moreover, HEAT increased plasma volume (PV) by 11.6% ( P = 0.007) and blood volume (BV) by 5.8% ( P = 0.007), whereas CON only showed an increase in PV (5.5%, P = 0.041). Exercise intensity and training load were not different between groups during the maintenance period., Conclusions: This study suggests that incorporating three weekly heat training sessions into the usual training routine preserves a moderately increased Hb mass in elite cyclists after an altitude camp., (Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Sports Medicine.)

Purpose and Methods: To test whether heat training performed as 5 × 50-min sessions per week for 5 wk in a heat chamber (CHAMBER) or while wearing a heat suit (SUIT), in temperate conditions, increases hemoglobin mass (Hb mass ) and endurance performance in elite cyclists, compared with a control group (CON-1). Furthermore, after the 5-wk intervention, we tested whether three sessions per week for 3 wk with heat suit (SUIT main ) would maintain Hb mass elevated compared with athletes who returned to normal training (HEAT stop ) or who continued to be the control group (CON-2)., Results: During the initial 5 wk, SUIT and CHAMBER increased Hb mass (2.6% and 2.4%) to a greater extent than CON-1 (-0.7%; both P < 0.01). The power output at 4 mmol·L -1 blood lactate and 1-min power output ( Wmax ) improved more in SUIT (3.6% and 7.3%, respectively) than CON-1 (-0.6%, P < 0.05; 0.2%, P < 0.01), whereas this was not the case for CHAMBER (1.4%, P = 0.24; 3.4%, P = 0.29). However, when SUIT and CHAMBER were pooled this revealed a greater improvement in a performance index (composed of power output at 4 mmol·L -1 blood lactate, Wmax , and 15-min power output) than CON-1 (4.9% ± 3.2% vs 1.7% ± 1.1%, respectively; P < 0.05). During the 3-wk maintenance period, SUIT main induced a larger increase in Hb mass than HEAT stop (3.3% vs 0.8%; P < 0.05), which was not different from the control (CON-2; 1.6%; P = 0.19), with no differences between HEAT stop and CON-2 ( P = 0.52)., Conclusions: Both SUIT and CHAMBER can increase Hb mass , and pooling SUIT and CHAMBER demonstrates that heat training can increase performance. Furthermore, compared with cessation of heat training, a sustained increase in Hb mass was observed during a subsequent 3-wk maintenance period, although the number of weekly heat training sessions was reduced to 3., (Copyright © 2022 by the American College of Sports Medicine.)