1. SARS-CoV-2 under an elimination strategy in Hong Kong
- Author
-
Dominic N.C. Tsang, Haogao Gu, Ruopeng Xie, Joseph L.-H. Tsui, Joseph T. Wu, Vijaykrishna Dhanasekaran, Benjamin J. Cowling, Kimberly M Edwards, Leo L.M. Poon, Gabriel M. Leung, Gigi Y Z Liu, Malik Peiris, Kathy Leung, Tommy Tsan-Yuk Lam, Dillon C Adam, Lydia D J Chang, Sammi S Y Cheuk, Carrie K C Wan, Shreya Gurung, Pavithra Krishnan, Daisy Y M Ng, and Daniel K. Chu
- Subjects
Travel ,2019-20 coronavirus outbreak ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,SARS-CoV-2 ,Public health ,Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) ,COVID-19 ,Genomics ,Article ,law.invention ,Transmission (mechanics) ,Geography ,law ,Epidemiology ,medicine ,Hong Kong ,Humans ,Public Health ,Demography - Abstract
Hong Kong utilized an elimination strategy with intermittent use of public health and social measures and increasingly stringent travel regulations to control SARS-CoV-2 transmission. By analyzing >1700 genome sequences representing 17% of confirmed cases from 23-January-2020 to 26-January-2021, we reveal the effects of fluctuating control measures on the evolution and epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 lineages in Hong Kong. Despite numerous importations, only three introductions were responsible for 90% of locally-acquired cases, two of which circulated cryptically for weeks while less stringent measures were in place. We found that SARS-CoV-2 within-host diversity was most similar among transmission pairs and epidemiological clusters due to a strong transmission bottleneck through which similar genetic background generates similar within-host diversity., One sentence summary: Out of the 170 detected introductions of SARS-CoV-2 in Hong Kong during 2020, three introductions caused 90% of community cases.
- Published
- 2021