Search

Membrane distillation (MD) is a process driven by the vapor pressure difference dependent on temperature variation, utilizing a hydrophobic porous membrane. MD operates at low pressure and temperature, exhibiting resilience to osmotic pressure. However, a challenge arises as the membrane performance diminishes due to temperature polarization (TP) occurring on the membrane surface. The vacuum MD process leverages the application of a vacuum to generate a higher vapor pressure difference, enhancing the flux and mitigating TP issues. Nevertheless, membrane fouling leads to decreased performance, causing membrane wetting and reducing the ion removal efficiency. This study investigates membrane fouling phenomena induced by various silica nanoparticle sizes (400, 900, and 1300 nm). The patterns of membrane fouling, as indicated by the flux reduction, vary depending on the particle size. Distinct MD performances are observed with changes in the feed water temperature and flow rate. When examining the membrane fouling mechanism for particles with a porosity resembling actual particulate materials, a fouling form similar to the solid type is noted. Therefore, this study elucidates the impact of particulate matter on membrane fouling under diverse conditions.

Air conditioning using a liquid desiccant (LD) is an energy-efficient air purification and cooling system. However, high energy is required to concentrate or regenerate the LD. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of membrane fouling in more detail and determine control strategies for LD concentrating using membrane distillation (MD). Two different LDs—lithium chloride (LiCl) and potassium formate (HCOOK)—were used. Because LDs require high concentrations by nature (i.e., 40 wt% for LiCl and 70 wt% for HCOOK), the concentration was started from half of those concentrations. This resulted in a flux decline with severe membrane fouling during the concentration using MD. Different membrane fouling mechanisms were also observed, depending on the LD type. Three different physical membrane fouling control methods, including water flushing (WF), air backwashing (AB), and membrane spacer (SP), were introduced. Results showed that WF was the most effective. Both AB and SP showed a marginal change to no cleaning; however, an initial flux with SP was about 1.5 times higher than no cleaning. Therefore, WF combined with the SP could maintain a high flux and a low fouling propensity in the treatment of a high-concentration solution using MD.