Search

Background: The deep circumflex iliac artery (DCIA) is rarely used as a perforator flap, despite a clear clinical need for thin osteocutaneous flaps, particularly in head and neck reconstruction. The poor adoption of such a flap is largely due to a poor understanding of the perforators of the DCIA, despite recent publications demonstrating suitable vascular anatomy of the DCIA perforators, particularly evident with the use of preoperative computed tomographic angiography (CTA). We have applied this method of peroperative imaging to successfully select those patients suitable for the DCIA perforator flap and use it clinically., Methods: We present a case series of patients who underwent DCIA perforator flap reconstruction following preoperative planning with CTA. Imaging findings, clinical course, and outcomes are presented., Results: Six out of seven patients planned for DCIA perforator flap reconstruction underwent a successful DCIA perforator flap, with imaging findings confirmed at operation, and without any flap loss, hernia, or other significant flap-related morbidities. Because of abberent anatomy and change in defect following excision of pathology, one patient was converted to a free fibular flap., Conclusion: With preoperative CTA planning, the DCIA perforator flap is a versatile and feasible flap for reconstruction of the mandible and extremities., (Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: While modern reconstructive surgery was revolutionized with the introduction of microsurgical techniques, microsurgery itself has seen the introduction of a range of technological aids and modern techniques aiming to improve dissection times, anastomotic times, and overall outcomes. These include improved preoperative planning, anastomotic aides, and earlier detection of complications with higher salvage rates. Despite the potential for substantial impact, many of these techniques have been evaluated in a limited fashion, and the evidence for each has not been universally explored. The purpose of this review was to establish and quantify the evidence for each technique., Methods: A search of relevant medical databases was performed to identify literature providing evidence for each technology. Levels of evidence were thus accumulated and applied to each technique., Results: There is a relative paucity of evidence for many of the more recent technologies described in the field of microsurgery, with no randomized controlled trials, and most studies in the field comprising case series only. Current evidence-based suggestions include the use of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) for the preoperative planning of perforator flaps, the intraoperative use of a mechanical anastomotic coupling aide (particularly the Unilink® coupler), and postoperative flap monitoring with strict protocols using clinical bedside monitoring and/or the implantable Doppler probe., Conclusion: Despite the breadth of technologies introduced into the field of microsurgery, there is substantial variation in the degree of evidence presented for each, suggesting the role for much future research, particularly from emerging technologies such as robotics and modern simulators., (Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Introduction: The superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) is a useful pedicle in supply to the lower abdominal integument, with its use sparing damage to rectus abdominis muscle or sheath. However, it is limited in usefulness due to its anatomical variability. While previous anatomical studies have been limited in number and study design, the use of preoperative imaging has enabled the analysis of this vasculature in large numbers and greater anatomical detail., Methods: A clinical anatomical study of 500 hemi-abdominal walls in 250 consecutive patients undergoing preoperative computed tomographic angiography (CTA) prior to autologous breast reconstruction was undertaken. The presence, size, location, and branching pattern of the SIEA were assessed in each case., Results: The SIEA was identified in 468 cases, an incidence of 94%. Its mean diameter was 0.6 mm, and in 24% of cases was of a diameter >1.5 mm. SIEA location was highly variable, with mean position 2-cm lateral to the linea semilunaris (range 0-8 cm lateral), and relationship to the superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV) was also highly variable, with the distance between them ranging from 0.3 to 8.5 cm apart. SIEA branches directly crossed the abdominal midline in 5% of cases. Larger SIEA diameters correlated with a decrease in diameter of ipsilateral DIEA perforators., Conclusion: The SIEA is present more frequently than previously demonstrated, but is typically too small for use in free tissue transfer. The variable degree of SIEA branching suggests that its territory of supply is also variable, and that preoperative imaging may be useful in planning SIEA flaps.

Background: The anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap has become increasingly popular due to its versatility and minimal donor site morbidity. Its major limitation has been uncertainty in predicting perforator anatomy, with the occasional absence of suitable perforators and high variability in their size and course. The variability of this anatomy has not been adequately explored previously., Methods: A cadaveric study was undertaken, in which 19 thighs (from 10 fresh cadavers) underwent contrast injection and angiographic imaging. Anatomical variations of the vasculature were recorded. A clinical study of 44 patients undergoing ALT flap reconstruction was also undertaken. Perforator anatomy was described in the first 32 patients, and the subsequent 12 patients underwent computed tomography angiography with a view to predicting individual anatomy and improving operative outcome., Results: Cadaver angiography was able to highlight and classify the variations in arterial anatomy, with four patterns observed and marked variability between cases. In 32 patients undergoing ALT flaps without preoperative CT angiography (CTA), five patients (16%) did not have any suitable perforators from the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery. By selecting the limb of choice with preoperative CTA, the incidence of flap unsuitability was reduced to 0%. Comparing CTA with Doppler, CTA was more accurate (sensitivity 100%) and provided more information., Conclusion: The perforators supplying the ALT flap show significant variability in location and course, with the potential for unsuitable perforators limiting flap success. Preoperative CTA can demonstrate the vascular anatomy and can aid perforator selection and operative success.

The deep circumflex iliac artery (DCIA) provides a dependable option for use as an osteo-musculo-cutaneous flap, particularly in mandibular reconstruction. Modifications to flaps based on DCIA perforators have been sought to prevent donor site morbidity as a consequence of muscle cuff harvest. Previous studies have been inconsistent in their descriptions of perforator anatomy, and means of assessing these preoperatively have not been widely described. A clinical anatomical study was undertaken, with a cohort of 44 hemiabdominal walls in 22 consecutive patients undergoing preoperative computed tomographic angiography (CTA) before free flap surgery. The feasibility of CTA and the regional vascular anatomy were both assessed. The use of CTA was shown to demonstrate DCIA perforators with high resolution and to be able to assess vessel size and location. In 44 hemiabdominal walls, there were 44 perforators of >0.8 mm diameter. There were no suitable perforators in 40% of sides, with 32% of sides having one perforator >0.8 mm diameter, 16% having two perforators, <10% had three perforators, and only one side had over four perforators. Perforators emerged from the deep fascia on an average of 5.1 cm cranial and 3.9 cm posterior to the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). Of the 44 perforators identified, 82% of perforators were located within a 4 cm by 4 cm area, 3 cm superior, and 2 cm posterior to the ASIS. The current study has demonstrated the utility of preoperative CTA for identifying DCIA perforators, and for selecting patients who may be suitable for a DCIA perforator flap given the variable perforator anatomy., ((c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Background: Breast reconstruction is increasingly performed with the use of the abdominal wall donor site, with potential complications including donor site morbidity and impaired flap viability. As a tool for selecting the optimal perforators which will ultimately supply the flap, preoperative imaging with computed tomography angiography (CTA) has become increasingly popular. Potential benefits include reduced intramuscular dissection, with faster and safer dissection, reduced donor site morbidity and improved flap vascularity and survival. Despite the potential for improvements in operative outcome, any benefits are yet to be established., Methods: A cohort study of 104 breast reconstructions in 88 patients was conducted. All patients underwent breast reconstruction based on an abdominal wall free flap. Of these, 40 patients undergoing preoperative imaging with CTA and 48 patients not undergoing CTA were included, with all CTAs undertaken at a single institution. Length of operation, length of stay, and operative complications were assessed. An evaluation of operative stress was achieved with the use of visual analogue scales (VAS) administered to the surgeons., Results: The use of CTA was associated with decreased operating time (mean: 77 min for bilateral cases), significantly decreased complications related to flap viability (particularly partial flap loss), and a statistically significant reduction in donor site morbidity. Psychometric testing of surgeons revealed a statistically significant decrease in operative stress (41% decrease) with the use of preoperative CTA., Conclusion: The use of CTA for preoperative imaging in breast reconstruction is associated with improved operative outcomes., ((c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)