Search

BACKGROUND The osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap (OC-RFFF) has been proposed as a safe and reliable free flap for head and neck reconstruction with low donor site morbidity. The purpose of this study is to compare the late complications (>30 days) associated with using the OC-RFFF versus the free fibula flap (FFF) for mandibular reconstruction following oncologic segmental resection. METHODS We conducted a single-institution, retrospective study composed of patients who underwent oncologic microvascular composite mandibular reconstruction with either the OC-RFFF or FFF. The primary predictor variable was the type of free flap used. The outcome variable was late complication postoperatively (>30 days). RESULTS A total of 93 patients (28, OC-RFFF and 65, FFF) were analyzed. The majority of patients were male (62%) and with AJCC stage T4a disease (72%). Mean hospital length of stay was comparable between the two flap groups (p = .50). OC-RFFF was associated with more late complications (p = .03) compared to FFF. Nonunion occurred in 10.7% of OC-RFFF and 0% of FFF. Partial or complete flap failure was seen in 7.1% and 0% in the OC-RFFF and FFF, respectively. Two-year disease-free survival was comparable in both groups (p > .05). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest that the rate of nonunion and odds of having a late complication were significantly greater in the OC-RFFF compared to the FFF following oncologic mandibular reconstruction. However, flap success, early complications (

Background Radial forearm free flaps are a versatile option for head and neck reconstruction, but often complicated by donor-site problems including skin-graft loss and wound breakdown. We introduce the radial forearm “snake” flap as a technique enabling primary donor site closure and compare wound healing outcomes to flap donor sites requiring split thickness skin graft (STSG) closure. Patients and Methods A review of all radial forearm free flaps harvested over a 5-year period was performed. We identified 18 radial forearm snake flaps whose donor sites were closed primarily. These flaps were designed as a long, narrow ellipse parallel to the forearm. An additional 57 forearm flaps were identified whose donor sites were closed with STSGs. Patient demographics, free flap survival rates, and wound healing complications were compared. Results The survival rate for radial forearm snake flaps was 100% compared to 98.2% for wider radial forearm flaps (P = 1.00). There were 8 tendon exposures at the donor site, all of which occurred in patients whose donor sites were closed with STSGs. Delayed wound healing occurred in 1 radial forearm snake flap donor site (5.6%) compared to 18 (31.6%) donor sites closed with STSGs (P = 0.03). Conclusions Radial forearm snake flaps are useful for reconstruction of small to medium size defects of the oral cavity and oropharynx and enable primary donor site closure. Flap success rates are not compromised by raising a radial forearm snake flap and rates of delayed healing of the flap donor site are significantly reduced compared to forearm flap donor sites closed with STSGs. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery, 2015.

Background The three commonly used free flaps for circumferential pharyngeal reconstruction after total pharyngo-laryngectomy are the radial forearm flap (RFF), the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap, and the jejunum flap. This study was to objectively compare three different flaps for pharyngeal reconstruction during the past 10 years. Stricture and fistula were assessed using esophagogram and esophagoscopy. Methods Forty-five patients with pharyngeal reconstructions had esophagram and esophagoscopy done postoperatively to assess for strictures and fistulas. These patients were divided into three groups based on pharyngeal reconstruction by ALT, RFF, and jejunal flaps. From the results of the esophagogram and esophagoscope, the presence of a fistula or stricture was compared and analyzed. Results There was only one ALT flap failure. The rate of fistula was 33%, 50%, and 30% in the ALT, RFF, and jejunal flap group respectively. The fistula rate revealed no significant difference between ALT, RFF, jejunal flap groups (P = 0.63). The rate of stricture was 38.1%, 57.1%, and 0% in the ALT, RFA, jejunal flap groups respectively. The stricture rate in jejunal flap group revealed significant decrease (P = 0.0093). Conclusion Jejunal flap has a significantly lower rate of stricture for reconstruction of circumferential pharyngeal defects when compared with RFF or ALT flaps.

Purpose This study aimed to determine the thicknesses of the three locations used as donor sites for radial forearm (RF), anterolateral thigh (ALT), and peroneal flaps and to determine probable contributing factors of the thickness. Methods This study included 201 healthy participants (mean age: 45.8 ± 17.2 years; male: 114; female: 87; BMI: 24.3 ± 4.3). Sonography was used to measure the thickness of flap donor sites. Forward stepwise regressions were conducted to determine the contributing factors of flap thickness. Results The RF flap (0.28 ± 0.08 cm) was thinner than peroneal flap (0.47 ± 0.17 cm) (P

Soft palate reconstruction is one of the greatest challenges for reconstructive surgeons. In the last 2 decades, anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps have emerged as a popular reconstructive option because of the low donor morbidity, replacing radial forearm (RF) flaps. For soft palatal reconstructions, however, the RF flap remains the option of first choice, and only a few reports have described soft palatal reconstruction using an ALT flap. At our hospital, ALT flaps were utilized in two cases with soft palatal tumors. During the operation, the nasal side was left unepithelized. To prevent infection of the perforators and pedicles, we dissected a muscle cuff for the perforators and positioned the perforators near the edge of the flap. The postoperative courses were uneventful, and the patients gained almost normal function. ALT fasciocutaneous flaps are a feasible option for soft palatal reconstruction. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Microsurgery, 2011.

In this article we report on the anatomical, experimental, and clinical investigations of the distally adipofascial pedicled radial forearm flap based on the small perforators around the radial styloid process. There are about 10 small perforators (0.3-0.5 mm in diameter) from the distal radial artery around the radial styloid process. The longitudinal chain-linked vascular plexuses (suprafascial, paraneural, and perivenous) formed by the forearm ascending and descending branches of septofasciocutaneous perforators meet and cross over with the transverse carpal vascular plexuses around the radial styloid region. Based on these directional-oriented plexuses, distally based adipofascial pedicled radial forearm fasciocutaneous and adipofascial flaps were designed and successfully applied in 34 clinical cases. The pivot point was located at 1-2 cm above the radial styloid. The skin island plus adipofascial pedicle measured between 9-18 cm in length, with the adipofascial pedicle 3-4 cm in width. The length-to-width ratio is 3-5:1. The venous drainage of this distally based flap was investigated anatomically and experimentally. The cephalic vein has no positive role for venous drainage in distally based flaps. The difference between distally based flaps and reverse-flow flaps, clinical selection of fasciocutaneous and adipofascial flaps, advantages and disadvantages, and technical tips for operative success are discussed.

The authors describe a case of Noma or Cancrum Oris, an oral gangrenous disease, features more frequently found in children from developing countries. The clinical features, its ethiopathogenesis, and its particular link with different geographic and economic areas of the world, its clinical evolution as well as surgical treatment are all discussed. Underlined is the functional and organic aspect of this disease, in particular the distortion of the face, which commonly involves the full thickness of the cheek skin and bone, mandibular ankylosis and craniofacial dismorphisms, and the modern approach in reconstructive microsurgery. The authors report a case of a patient affected by Noma, with a very evident left face dismorphism, where we found a brilliant solution using a left radial forearm fasciocutaneous free flap, appropriately shaped.

The aim of this article is to compare the superficial venous drainage system versus dual venous drainage system of radial forearm free flaps (RFFF) and its impact on flap survival. A total of 136 consecutive patients undergoing RFFF reconstruction for oral and maxillofacial surgical defects were reviewed retrospectively. In group l, both the superficial and deep veins were anastomosed to the neck recipient veins. In group 2, only the superficial vein was used for anastomosis. There were no statistical differences in venous problems between two groups (6/68 in group 1 vs. 5/68 in group 2, P = 0.75). The flap survival rate was 98.5% (66/68 in group 1 vs. 68/68 in group 2, P = 0.15). Although there are many theoretical advantages to dual venous drainage system anastomoses, they seem not to impact on flap survival in our experience.

Flaps have long been recognized as an essential tool for soft-tissue reconstruction. Flaps range in complexity from local to free and perforator flaps and can include a variety of composite tissues. The concept of a flow-through flap, in which both the proximal and the distal ends of the vascular pedicle of a free flap are anastamosed to provide blood flow to distal tissues, was first described by Soutar et al. in 1983. An uninterrupted arterial flow was established by Soutar et al. between the external carotid and distal facial artery via a radial forearm flap for head and neck reconstruction (Soutar et al., Br J Plast Surg 1983;36:1-8). Shortly thereafter, Foucher et al. were the first to report the reconstruction of an extremity with a simultaneous vascular defect by utilizing a radial forearm flow-through flap (Foucher et al., Br J Plast Surg 1984;37:139-148). The utility of the flow-through flap is now well established, and its indications for use continue to grow. The principle advantage of this flap is that it provides the opportunity for a single stage composite reconstruction of both soft tissue and vascular defects, making it particularly useful in the reconstruction of ischemic extremities and defects from oncologic ablations. Improvements in microsurgical equipment and techniques are making early difficulties with these flaps irrelevant, giving plastic surgeons opportunities to become more creative in the choices and uses of flow-through flaps. The literature consists mostly of case reports and series. The nomenclature used to describe the types of flow-through flaps is confusing and inconsistent. The purpose of this article is to provide an organized review of flow-through flaps and to classify these flaps based on their inflow, outflow, and the nature of their vascular conduit. Additionally, we have included a discussion on the physiology of these flaps, reviewed the current literature, and summarized the various types of flow-through flaps in a reference guide that can aid in flap selection.

Standard magnification in microsurgery is accomplished with the operating microscope. Loupes are perceived by the microsurgical community as technically less safe. However, after several years of microscope-only microsurgery, most of our microvascular procedures are performed under loupes 3.5-4x. Considering our results using loupes-only microsurgery, which are comparable with those obtained when using the microscope, we suggest that loupe-aided microsurgery might represent a natural progression for the experienced microsurgeon. Microsurgical skills and experience outweigh the importance of the magnification factor. While the microscope is mandatory for replantations distal to the palmary arch, microneurosurgery, and supramicrosurgery, loupes should be used in so-called "macro-microsurgery." One may include in this category replantations down to the palmar arch and free flaps with vessels more than 1.5 mm, such as the latissimus, serratus, (para)scapular, fibula, radial forearm, rectus abdominis, dorsalis pedis, omentum, and jejunum. Before starting loupes-only microsurgery, intensive training under the microscope is crucial. Less magnification does not mean less quality.

Chronic, open wounds about the elbow frequently require flap coverage. Skin grafts, local transposition flaps, muscle transposition flaps, and two-staged pedicled flaps from the chest and abdomen as well as free tissue transfers have all been reported. Recalcitrant elbow defects in patients in whom these previous flaps have failed are especially challenging to the upper extremity reconstructive surgeon. We have successfully employed pedicled radial forearm flaps in three patients in whom one or more previous flaps have failed.