Search

Study Design Retrospective review (level of evidence III). Objective Surgical care patterns for lumbar disc herniation (LDH), a common musculoskeletal condition of high relevance to the Military Health System (MHS), have not been described or compared across the direct care and purchased care MHS components. This study aimed to describe surgery rates in MHS beneficiaries who were diagnosed with LDH in direct care versus purchased care and to evaluate characteristics associated with the location of surgery. Differences in care patterns for LDH may suggest unexpected variation within the centrally managed MHS. Methods We described 1-year rates of surgery among beneficiaries who were diagnosed with LDH in direct care versus purchased care. Among beneficiaries who were diagnosed in direct care and had surgery, multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify characteristics associated with surgery location. Results We identified 726,638 MHS beneficiaries who were diagnosed with LDH in direct care or purchased care during the 9-year study period. One-year surgery rates were 10.1% in beneficiaries who were diagnosed in direct care versus 11.3% in beneficiaries who were diagnosed in purchased care. Among the 7467 patients who were diagnosed in direct care and had surgery within 1 year, characteristics associated with lower probability of surgery in purchased care versus direct care included diagnosing facility type (hospital with a neurosurgery or spine specialty versus clinic (odds ratio [OR], 0.12 (95% CI, 0.10-0.15)), Navy versus Army (OR, 0.24 (95% CI, 0.21-0.28)), and diagnosing facility specialty (Medical Expense and Performance Reporting System) (surgical care (OR, 0.33 (95% CI, 0.27-0.40)) and orthopedic care (OR, 0.39 (95% CI, 0.33-0.46)) versus primary care. The presence of comorbidities was associated with higher probability of surgery in purchased care versus direct care (OR, 1.20 (95% CI, 1.06-1.36)). Conclusions The 1-year rate of surgery for LDH was modestly higher in beneficiaries who were diagnosed in purchased care versus direct care. Among patients who were diagnosed in direct care, several patient-level and facility-level characteristics were associated with receiving surgery in purchased care, suggesting potentially unexpected variation in care utilization across components of the MHS.

IntroductionTrauma, degenerative, pediatric, and neuromuscular deformities often require placement of implants into sacrum for construct stability. In these scenarios, fixation to the ilium is often added. To date, multiple studies have validated the correlation between Hounsfield units (HU) as measured on computed tomography and bone mineral density (BMD) on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to assess bone quality and fracture risk. We sought to map the BMD of the iliosacral region at the S1 and S2 levels using HU.Materials and MethodsPelvic CT scans of 100 patients were evaluated. HU measurements were taken from the anterior and posterior ilium, sacral ala, and sacral body using a best-fit circle encompassing a maximal amount of cancellous bone. Following the collection of all data points, an analysis of variance model was created to test the means and standard deviations of each anatomic region.ResultsThe highest mean BMD was found in the following locations (in descending order): S1 sacral body (279.72 HU, 95% confidence interval [CI], 261.75–297.69), S1 anterior ilium (254.45 HU, 95% CI, 236.64–272.27), S2 anterior ilium (229.88 HU, 95% CI, 211.39–248.36), and the S2 sacral body (191.58 HU, 95% CI, 173.31–209.85). Comparing the anterior ilium to the sacral ala, there was a higher BMD measurement at both the S1 level by 151.7 HU (p ConclusionsThe findings indicate that there is significantly higher BMD density of the anterior ilium and sacral body when compared to the sacral ala at both the S1 and S2 levels. In addition, the anterior ilium appears to provide more dense bone than the posterior ilium, as measured by mean HU.

Injuries to the spinal column in combat casualties sustained during the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan are common, and the highest in reported wartime history. High-energy blast mechanisms from improved explosive devices have resulted in complex polytrauma and injury patterns, which are often markedly different from those injuries encountered in civilian trauma. Herein, we review the most current literature with regard to the distinct types of combat-related spine injuries/concomitant comorbidities sustained in Operations Enduring Freedom, Iraqi Freedom and New Dawn.

We set out to describe combat-related spine trauma over a 10-year period, and thereby determine the frequency of new onset radiculopathy secondary to injuries sustained in support of combat operations. We performed a retrospective analysis of a surgical database at three military institutions. Patients undergoing spine surgery following a combat-related injury in Afghanistan or Iraq between July 2003 and July 2013 were evaluated. We identified 105 patients with combat-related (Operations Enduring and Iraqi Freedom) spine trauma requiring operative intervention. Of these, 15 (14.3%) patients had radiculopathy as their primary complaint after injury. All patients were diagnosed with herniated nucleus pulposus. The average age was 39 years, with 80% injured in Iraq and 20% in Afghanistan. The most common mechanism of injury was mounted improvised explosive device (33%). The cervical spine was most commonly involved (53%), followed by lumbar spine (40%). Average time from injury to surgery was 23.4 months; 53% of patients had continued symptoms following surgery, and two patients had at least one revision surgery. Two patients were medically retired because of their symptoms. This study is the only of its kind evaluating the operative treatment of traumatic radiculopathy following combat-related trauma. We identified a relatively high rate of radiculopathy in these patients.