Search

Sepsis-associated brain dysfunction is a frequent disorder in septic patients and has a multifactorial pathophysiology. Cholinergic pathways and brainstem dysfunction may result in pupillary alterations. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether early assessment of the Neurological Pupil Index (NPiRetrospective cohort study of adult critically ill septic patients admitted to the intensive care unit of a University Hospital; patients with acute or known brain damage were excluded. Patients' severity was assessed by the daily Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score and the SOFAinfmax/inf(i.e., highest SOFA Score during the first five days) was computed. The worst NPi (i.e., lowest value from one eye) was collected daily and then computed over the first five days of assessment. Mortality was assessed at hospital discharge.A total of 75 patients were included over the study period (median age 67 [53-75] years and median SOFA Score at admission 10 [8-12]); 64 (85%) presented septic shock; 48 (64%) died at hospital discharge. The worst NPi during the first five days of sepsis was significantly lower in non-survivors compared to survivors (4.4 [3.6-4.6] vs. 4.5 [4.2-4.7]; P=0.042). The worst NPi was also significantly lower in high severity group (i.e., SOFAinfmax/inf≥12) when compared to others (4.4 [3.2- 4.5] vs. 4.5 [4.0-4.7] P=0.01). However, in the multivariate analyses, the NPi value was not independently associated with in-hospital mortality or high SOFAinfmax/inf.In this study, no independent prognostic role of NPi was observed in septic patients. Further larger prospective studies are needed to better evaluate the role of automated pupillometry in this setting.

High levels of procalcitonin (PCT) have been associated with a higher risk of mortality in COVID-19 patients. We explored the prognostic role of early PCT assessment in critically ill COVID-19 patients and whether PCT predictive performance would be influenced by immunosuppression.Retrospective multicentric analysis of prospective collected data in COVID-19 patients consecutively admitted to 36 intensive care units (ICUs) in Spain and Andorra from March to June 2020. Adult (18 years) patients with confirmed COVID-19 and available PCT values (72 hours from ICU admission) were included. Patients were considered as "no immunosuppression" (NI), "chronic immunosuppression" (CI) and "acute immunosuppression" (AIT if only tocilizumab; AIS if only steroids, AITS if both). The primary outcome was the ability of PCT to predict ICU mortality.Of the 1079 eligible patients, 777 patients were included in the analysis. Mortality occurred in 227 (28%) patients. In the NI group 144 (19%) patients were included, 67 (9%) in the CI group, 66 (8%) in the AIT group, 262 (34%) in the AIS group and 238 (31%) in the AITS group; PCT was significantly higher in non-survivors when compared with survivors (0.64 [0.17-1.44] vs. 0.23 [0.11-0.60] ng/mL; P0.01); however, in the multivariable analysis, PCT values was not independently associated with ICU mortality. PCT values and ICU mortality were significantly higher in patients in the NI and CI groups.PCT values are not independent predictors of ICU mortality in COVID-19 patients. Acute immunosuppression significantly reduced PCT values, although not influencing its predictive value.