Search

Background: Positive microbiological fungal culture from bronchoalveolar-lavage-fluid (BAL) for Aspergillus or tissue biopsy and the detection of high levels of Aspergillus Galactomannan (GM) are commonly considered standard for diagnosing Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis (IPA). However, Aspergillus infection induces both cellular and humoral immune responses, characterized by the production of specific immunoglobulins, which can be easily detected in serum and accurately measured. This study hypothesized that Aspergillus-specific IgE, IgG, including IgG4, assays could be adopted as a rapid preliminary screening tool in patients with suspected Aspergillus-related lung disease in order to help in the identification of patients who require more invasive procedures (bronchoscopy, biopsy)., Methods: We prospectively stored 447 serum specimens of patients admitted for suspected IPA from 1 January 2010 to 31 July 2021. Serum total IgE and serum IgE, IgG and IgG4 specific for Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus niger were determined for each sample. In addition, bronchoscopy with BAL for microbiologic culture and Aspergillus Galactomannan (GM) antigen were performed in all patients., Results: Patients with IPA, diagnosed by detection of a positive BAL culture for Aspergillus and/or a positive GM, showed higher serum levels of specific Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus niger immunoglobulins. Serum-specific Aspergillus fumigatus IgG at a cut-off of 22.6 mgA/L showed the highest sensitivity in predicting IPA, though quite moderate (AUC 0.62). Nonetheless, the simultaneous presence of values below the cut-off of Aspergillus IgE, IgG and IgG4 showed a negative predictive value greater than 90% both towards positive BAL culture and positive GM., Conclusions: In patients with suspected IPA, Aspergillus-specific immunoglobulins assay could be tested as a preliminary screening tool to support more invasive procedures, i.e. BAL.

Asthma is the most commonly occurring respiratory complication during pregnancy, and is associated with a wide range of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. However, there is strong evidence that an adequate control of asthma can improve the health of both mothers and their babies. Despite the well-known risks of poorly-controlled asthma during pregnancy, a large proportion of women have sub-optimal asthma control, due to concerns surrounding risks related to pharmacological agents and uncertainties regarding the effectiveness and safety of different management strategies. A recent retrospective study showed that step-up therapy with low-dose inhaled corticosteroids / long-acting β2-agonist inhalers (ICS/LABA) or high-dose ICS presents the same risk profile in terms of major congenital malformations. These results are consistent with asthma management guidelines and provide scientific evidence to help physicians and mothers make evidence-based treatment decisions during pregnancy, particularly when stepping up to higher doses of ICS or addition of a LABA are required. These reassuring results should encourage women to continue their asthma medications when required to control their asthma during pregnancy and increase the likelihood of healthy pregnancies and newborns. This commentary focuses on some critical issues of this recent work and to the need of future study to evaluate the safety during pregnancy of novel molecules recently introduced for asthma treatment.