1. Laboratory Response to Ebola — West Africa and United States
- Author
-
Jonathan S. Towner, Sharon E Andrews, Luis Lowe, Tara K. Sealy, Celine H. Taboy, Elizabeth Weirich, Brian H. Bird, Mark A. Rayfield, Laura E. Rose, Ute Ströher, John D. Klena, Bobbie R. Erickson, and Christina F. Spiropoulou
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Gerontology ,International Cooperation ,medicine.disease_cause ,International Health Regulations ,Disease Outbreaks ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Global health ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures ,Ebola virus ,business.industry ,Capacity building ,General Medicine ,Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola ,Public relations ,United States ,Audience measurement ,Africa, Western ,030104 developmental biology ,Preparedness ,Workforce ,Sustainability ,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S ,Laboratories ,business - Abstract
The 2014-2016 Ebola virus disease (Ebola) epidemic in West Africa highlighted the need to maintain organized laboratory systems or networks that can be effectively reorganized to implement new diagnostic strategies and laboratory services in response to large-scale events. Although previous Ebola outbreaks enabled establishment of critical laboratory practice safeguards and diagnostic procedures, this Ebola outbreak in West Africa highlighted the need for planning and preparedness activities that are better adapted to emerging pathogens or to pathogens that have attracted little commercial interest. The crisis underscored the need for better mechanisms to streamline development and evaluation of new diagnostic assays, transfer of material and specimens between countries and organizations, and improved processes for rapidly deploying health workers with specific laboratory expertise. The challenges and events of the outbreak forced laboratorians to examine not only the comprehensive capacities of existing national laboratory systems to recognize and respond to events, but also their sustainability over time and the mechanisms that need to be pre-established to ensure effective response. Critical to this assessment was the recognition of how response activities (i.e., infrastructure support, logistics, and workforce supplementation) can be used or repurposed to support the strengthening of national laboratory systems during the postevent transition to capacity building and recovery. This report compares CDC's domestic and international laboratory response engagements and lessons learned that can improve future responses in support of the International Health Regulations and Global Health Security Agenda initiatives.The activities summarized in this report would not have been possible without collaboration with many U.S. and international partners (http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/outbreaks/2014-west-africa/partners.html).
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF