Search

Pomalidomide (POM) is a second-generation immunomodulatory agent with proven efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) proven to be refractory to previous treatment with lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib. We herein conducted a retrospective analysis of 14 RRMM patients receiving POM to determine its tolerability and safety in the clinical setting. The median age of the patients was 72 years (range, 58-84 years), and 85.7% of the patients were aged >70 years. The most frequent treatment dose was 3 mg/day. POM dose reductions were required in 54.5% (6/11) of the patients. The patient data were compared among three age groups (<70, 70-75 and >75 years) and there was only significant difference in daily POM treatment dose. The tolerability of POM must be confirmed, particularly in elderly patients. Dose reduction from 4 to 3 mg occurred during the second cycle in 83.3% (5/6) of the patients. It is important to determine the tolerability of POM in the early phases of treatment. The most frequently reported grade 3/4 hematological adverse events were neutropenia (64.3%), anemia (64.3%) and thrombocytopenia (57.1%). Although the median number of treatment cycles was 4 (range, 1-13), 21.4% (3/14) of the patients with a performance status (PS) of 3 were administered only 1 treatment cycle. The tolerability of POM was low among patients with poor PS and an aggressive treatment introduction should be avoided. However, 21.4% (3/14) of the patients were able to continue treatment for >1 year and some patients received long-term therapy. POM does not require dose modification for renal function, and multiple capsule doses are available, which is an advantage of POM compared with LEN. POM may be administered to late-stage RRMM patients in a real-world clinical setting, but elderly patients or those with poor PS must be treated with caution. In this manner, the treatment options for RRMM patients may be expanded by assessing the tolerability and safety of POM.

The present study aimed to determine the effect of the timing of treatment discontinuation on the prognosis of patients with advanced and recurrent gastric cancer chemotherapy. Between July 2014 and March 2017, 127 patients who underwent chemotherapy for advanced and recurrent gastric cancer at Ogaki Municipal Hospital (Ogaki, Japan) were examined. To determine factors associated with survival, multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model, and hazard ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. The reasons for discontinuation of last-line chemotherapy and the last hospitalization prior to mortality were surveyed. Age (≤51 years), number of treatment lines (≤1 line), and days between last dose of the final chemotherapy regimen and death (≤79 days) were independently and significantly associated with survival in the multivariate analysis. Compared with patients who did not receive chemotherapy in the last 79 days of life, those who received chemotherapy in the last 79 days of life days had a hazard ratio of 1.858 (95% CI, 1.059-3.261; P=0.031) for mortality. A decrease in the performance status was responsible for treatment discontinuation in 51 of 75 cases among patients who received chemotherapy in the last 79 days of life and 9 of 26 cases among patients who did not receive chemotherapy in this duration (P<0.001). Among patients who received chemotherapy in the last 79 days of life, 67 patients were hospitalized prior to mortality; among patients who did not receive chemotherapy in this duration, 15 patients were hospitalized prior to mortality (P<0.001). In conclusion, continuation of chemotherapy until just prior to mortality does not prolong the survival time in patients with advanced and recurrent gastric cancer.