Search

Environmental transitions, such as the salinity divide separating marine and fresh waters, shape biodiversity over both shallow and deep timescales, opening up new niches and creating opportunities for accelerated speciation and adaptive radiation. Understanding the genetics of environmental adaptation is central to understanding how organisms colonise and subsequently diversify in new habitats. We used time‐resolved transcriptomics to contrast the hyposalinity stress responses of two diatoms. Skeletonema marinoi has deep marine ancestry but has recently invaded brackish waters. Cyclotella cryptica has deep freshwater ancestry and can withstand a much broader salinity range. Skeletonema marinoi is less adept at mitigating even mild salinity stress compared to Cyclotella cryptica, which has distinct mechanisms for rapid mitigation of hyposaline stress and long‐term growth in low salinity. We show that the cellular mechanisms underlying low salinity tolerance, which has allowed diversification across freshwater habitats worldwide, includes elements that are both conserved and variable across the diatom lineage. The balance between ancestral and lineage‐specific environmental responses in phytoplankton have shaped marine–freshwater transitions on evolutionary timescales and, on contemporary timescales, will affect which lineages survive and adapt to changing ocean conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The salinity gradient separating marine and freshwater environments is a major ecological divide, and the mechanisms by which most organisms adapt to new salinity environments are poorly understood. Diatoms are a lineage of ancestrally marine microalgae that have repeatedly colonized and diversified in freshwaters. Cyclotella cryptica is a euryhaline diatom found in salinities ranging from fully freshwater to fully marine, thus providing a powerful system for understanding the genomic mechanisms for mitigating and acclimating to low salinity. To understand how diatoms mitigate acute hypo‐osmotic stress, we abruptly shifted C. cryptica from seawater to freshwater and performed transcriptional profiling during the first 10 h. Freshwater shock dramatically remodelled the transcriptome, with ~50% of the genome differentially expressed in at least one time point. The peak response occurred within 1 h, with strong repression of genes involved in cell growth and osmolyte production, and strong induction of specific stress defence genes. Transcripts largely returned to baseline levels within 4–10 h, with growth resuming shortly thereafter, suggesting that gene expression dynamics may be useful for predicting acclimation. Moreover, comparison to a transcriptomics study of C. cryptica following months‐long acclimation to freshwater revealed little overlap between the genes and processes differentially expressed in cells exposed to acute stress versus fully acclimated conditions. Altogether, this study highlights the power of time‐resolved transcriptomics to reveal fundamental insights into how cells dynamically respond to an acute environmental shift and provides new insights into how diatoms mitigate natural salinity fluctuations and have successfully diversified across freshwater habitats worldwide. see also the Perspective by Gust Bilcke and Shiho Kamakura [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]