Search

Objectives: To gain insight into the frequency, age of onset, and management of cervical cord compression in mucopolysaccharidosis VI (MPS VI)., Methods: Cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data and/or cervical decompression surgery data collected between 30 June 2005 and 1 September 2015 were analyzed from subjects enrolled in the MPS VI Clinical Surveillance Program (CSP) (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00214773), an ongoing multicenter, observational, retrospective and prospective registry., Results: Of 213 subjects enrolled in the CSP, 134 (62.9%) had at least one documented cervical spine MRI assessment. An additional four subjects were identified through surgery records alone to yield a study population comprising 138 subjects (mean age at enrollment =15.1years; age range=0.80-65.0years). Cervical cord compression was documented in 101 (75.4%) of the 134 subjects with ≥1 MRI assessment, the majority (95.0%) by the time of the first recorded MRI. In general, subjects with cervical cord compression had significantly lower height Z-scores compared to those without cervical cord compression (p<0.0001); nevertheless, a few subjects of taller stature had documented cervical cord compression at a young age. Most subjects >20years of age (31/33, 93.9%) presented with cervical cord compression. There was an insufficient number of subjects with both pre- and post-enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) MRI data to determine any association between ERT and cervical cord compression. Surgical decompression was performed on 58 subjects (42.0%), with mean age at first surgery of 13.1years. Decompression plus stabilization procedures accounted for 12.1% of surgeries. Eight subjects (13.8%) underwent reoperation. Complications during or following surgery were reported in 3 subjects, with anesthesia-related complications resulting in two deaths., Conclusions: All individuals with MPS VI are at high risk of developing cervical cord compression at an early age. Routine MRI assessments should be initiated from the time of MPS VI diagnosis. The perioperative management of MPS VI patients can be challenging. This study contributes to the understanding of the natural history of MPS VI., (Copyright © 2016 Shire Human Genetic Therapies. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cervical cord compression is a sequela of mucopolysaccharidosis VI, a rare lysosomal storage disorder, and has devastating consequences. An international panel of orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, anesthesiologists, neuroradiologists, metabolic pediatricians, and geneticists pooled their clinical expertise to codify recommendations for diagnosing, monitoring, and managing cervical cord compression; for surgical intervention criteria; and for best airway management practices during imaging or anesthesia. The recommendations offer ideal best practices but also attempt to recognize the worldwide spectrum of resource availability. Functional assessments and clinical neurological examinations remain the cornerstone for identification of early signs of myelopathy, but magnetic resonance imaging is the gold standard for identification of cervical cord compression. Difficult airways of MPS VI patients complicate the anesthetic and, thus, the surgical management of cervical cord compression. All patients with MPS VI require expert airway management during any surgical procedure. Neurophysiological monitoring of the MPS VI patient during complex spine or head and neck surgery is considered standard practice but should also be considered for other procedures performed with the patient under general anesthesia, depending on the length and type of the procedure. Surgical interventions may include cervical decompression, stabilization, or both. Specific techniques vary widely among surgeons. The onset, presentation, and rate of progression of cervical cord compression vary among patients with MPS VI. The availability of medical resources, the expertise and experience of members of the treatment team, and the standard treatment practices vary among centers of expertise. Referral to specialized, experienced MPS treatment centers should be considered for high-risk patients and those requiring complex procedures. Therefore, the key to optimal patient care is to implement best practices through meaningful communication among treatment team members at each center and among MPS VI specialists worldwide., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)