Search

Your search keyword '"Fry WE"' showing total 3 results
Start Over Author "Fry WE" Journal molecular plant pathology
3 results on '"Fry WE"'

1. The Top 10 oomycete pathogens in molecular plant pathology

Author

Kamoun S, Furzer O, Jones JD, Judelson HS, Ali GS, Dalio RJ, Roy SG, Schena L, Zambounis A, Panabières F, Cahill D, Ruocco M, Figueiredo A, Chen XR, Hulvey J, Stam R, Lamour K, Gijzen M, Tyler BM, Grünwald NJ, Mukhtar MS, Tomé DF, Tör M, Van den Ackerveken G, McDowell J, Daayf F, Fry WE, Lindqvist-Kreuze H, Meijer HJ, Petre B, Ristaino J, Yoshida K, Birch PR, Govers F, Sub Plant-Microbe Interactions, Plant Microbe Interactions, The Sainsbury Laboratory [Norwich] (TSL), Department of Plant Pathology & Microbiology [Riverside], University of California [Riverside] (UCR), University of California-University of California, Department of Plant Pathology and MREC, IFAS [University of Florida], University of Florida [Gainesville] (UF), Centro de Citricultura Sylvio Moreira/Instituto Agronomico, Università degli Studi Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, BIOlogie et GEstion des Risques en agriculture (BIOGER), AgroParisTech-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Deakin University, Burwood, Australia, Deakin University [Burwood], Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection of National Research Council (ISPP - CNR), Center for Biodiversity, Functional & Integrative Genomics, Universidade de Lisboa (ULISBOA), Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts System (UMASS), Division of Plant Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, The University of Tennessee [Knoxville], Agriculture and Agri-Food [Ottawa] (AAFC), Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University (OSU), USDA-ARS : Agricultural Research Service, University of Alabama at Birmingham [ Birmingham] (UAB), University of Warwick [Coventry], National Pollen and Aerobiology Research Unit, Worcester State University [Worcester], Plant-Microbe Interactions, Department of Biology, Utrecht University [Utrecht], Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science [Blacksburg] (PPPWS), Virginia Tech [Blacksburg], University of Manitoba [Winnipeg], Cornell University [New York], International Potato Center [Lima] (CIP), Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research [CGIAR] (CGIAR), Laboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen] (WUR), Interactions Arbres-Microorganismes (IAM), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université de Lorraine (UL), North Carolina A&T State University, University of North Carolina System (UNC), European Research Council (ERC), UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), Gatsby Charitable Foundation, National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq/CsF Brazil) (313139/2013-0), Conoscenze Integrate per Sostenibilita ed Innovazione del Made in Italy Agroalimentare (CISIA-MIUR), Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR) (FIRB 2010-RBFR10PZ4N), Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (SFRH/BPD/63641/2009), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31101395), Jiangsu Province Basic Research Program (Natural Science Foundation) of China (BK2011443), Agriculture and Food Research Institute of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture of the US Department of Agriculture (2011-68004-30154, 2011-68004-30104), Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada GRDI program, US Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture (2011-68004-30154), National Research Initiative Competitive Grants Program (2008-35600-18780), US Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service (CRIS 5358-22000-039-00D), Northwest Center for Nursery Crop Research, US Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service Floriculture Nursery Initiative, Oregon Department of Agriculture/Oregon Association of Nurseries, UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/G015066/1), US Department of Agriculture-Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (2009-03008, 2011-68004), National Science Foundation (ABI-1146819), Virginia Tech Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Sciences, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Manitoba Agri-Food Research and Development Initiative (MB-ARDI), McCain Foods, Keystone Potato Producers Association (KPPA), Peak of the Market, Dutch Technology Foundation STW-NWO (VIDI) (10281), INRA Contrat Jeune Scientifique, Food for Thought Program, Wageningen University Fund, European Project: 267196,EC:FP7:PEOPLE,FP7-PEOPLE-2010-COFUND,AGREENSKILLS(2012), University of California [Riverside] (UC Riverside), University of California (UC)-University of California (UC), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-AgroParisTech, CNR Istituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante [Torino, Italia] (IPSP), National Research Council of Italy | Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Universidade de Lisboa = University of Lisbon (ULISBOA), and Agriculture and Agri-Food (AAFC)

Subjects
sudden oak death, oomycetes plant pathology, EPS-2, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], phytophthora-infestans, microbiology, Reviews, blister rusts albuginaceae, irish potato famine, arabidopsis-thaliana, Plants, Laboratorium voor Phytopathologie, diversity, eastern united-states, Oomycetes, genomics, Laboratory of Phytopathology, nb-lrr gene, plasmopara-viticola, grapevine downy mildew, 3 clonal lineages
Abstract

International audience; Oomycetes form a deep lineage of eukaryotic organisms that includes a large number of plant pathogens which threaten natural and managed ecosystems. We undertook a survey to query the community for their ranking of plant‐pathogenic oomycete species based on scientific and economic importance. In total, we received 263 votes from 62 scientists in 15 countries for a total of 33 species. The Top 10 species and their ranking are: (1) Phytophthora infestans; (2, tied) Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis; (2, tied) Phytophthora ramorum; (4) Phytophthora sojae; (5) Phytophthora capsici; (6) Plasmopara viticola; (7) Phytophthora cinnamomi; (8, tied) Phytophthora parasitica; (8, tied) Pythium ultimum; and (10) Albugo candida. This article provides an introduction to these 10 taxa and a snapshot of current research. We hope that the list will serve as a benchmark for future trends in oomycete research.

Published
2014
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Transcriptional dynamics of Phytophthora infestans during sequential stages of hemibiotrophic infection of tomato.

Author

Zuluaga AP, Vega-Arreguín JC, Fei Z, Ponnala L, Lee SJ, Matas AJ, Patev S, Fry WE, and Rose JK

Subjects
Cluster Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Leaves microbiology, Proteins metabolism, RNA, Messenger genetics, RNA, Messenger metabolism, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Time Factors, Nicotiana microbiology, Transcriptome genetics, Solanum lycopersicum microbiology, Phytophthora infestans genetics, Phytophthora infestans pathogenicity, Plant Diseases microbiology, Transcription, Genetic
Abstract

Hemibiotrophic plant pathogens, such as the oomycete Phytophthora infestans, employ a biphasic infection strategy, initially behaving as biotrophs, where minimal symptoms are exhibited by the plant, and subsequently as necrotrophs, feeding on dead plant tissue. The regulation of this transition and the breadth of molecular mechanisms that modulate plant defences are not well understood, although effector proteins secreted by the pathogen are thought to play a key role. We examined the transcriptional dynamics of P. infestans in a compatible interaction with its host tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) at three infection stages: biotrophy; the transition from biotrophy to necrotrophy; and necrotrophy. The expression data suggest a tight temporal regulation of many pathways associated with the suppression of plant defence mechanisms and pathogenicity, including the induction of putative cytoplasmic and apoplastic effectors. Twelve of these were experimentally evaluated to determine their ability to suppress necrosis caused by the P. infestans necrosis-inducing protein PiNPP1.1 in Nicotiana benthamiana. Four effectors suppressed necrosis, suggesting that they might prolong the biotrophic phase. This study suggests that a complex regulation of effector expression modulates the outcome of the interaction., (© 2015 BSPP AND JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD.)

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Analysis of the tomato leaf transcriptome during successive hemibiotrophic stages of a compatible interaction with the oomycete pathogen Phytophthora infestans.

Author

Zuluaga AP, Vega-Arreguín JC, Fei Z, Matas AJ, Patev S, Fry WE, and Rose JK

Subjects
Disease Resistance genetics, Gene Expression Profiling, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant drug effects, Gene Ontology, Genes, Plant, Host-Pathogen Interactions drug effects, Solanum lycopersicum drug effects, Phytophthora infestans drug effects, Plant Growth Regulators pharmacology, Plant Leaves drug effects, RNA, Messenger genetics, RNA, Messenger metabolism, Receptors, Pattern Recognition metabolism, Time Factors, Host-Pathogen Interactions genetics, Solanum lycopersicum genetics, Solanum lycopersicum microbiology, Phytophthora infestans pathogenicity, Plant Leaves genetics, Plant Leaves microbiology, Transcriptome genetics
Abstract

The infection of plants by hemibiotrophic pathogens involves a complex and highly regulated transition from an initial biotrophic, asymptomatic stage to a later necrotrophic state, characterized by cell death. Little is known about how this transition is regulated, and there are conflicting views regarding the significance of the plant hormones jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA) in the different phases of infection. To provide a broad view of the hemibiotrophic infection process from the plant perspective, we surveyed the transcriptome of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) during a compatible interaction with the hemibiotrophic oomycete Phytophthora infestans during three infection stages: biotrophic, the transition from biotrophy to necrotrophy, and the necrotrophic phase. Nearly 10 000 genes corresponding to proteins in approximately 400 biochemical pathways showed differential transcript abundance during the three infection stages, revealing a major reorganization of plant metabolism, including major changes in source-sink relations, as well as secondary metabolites. In addition, more than 100 putative resistance genes and pattern recognition receptor genes were induced, and both JA and SA levels and associated signalling pathways showed dynamic changes during the infection time course. The biotrophic phase was characterized by the induction of many defence systems, which were either insufficient, evaded or suppressed by the pathogen., (© 2015 BSPP AND JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD.)

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results